Hello Lukas,
I am the person who raised the issue with the cloud-init folks about
this difference.
I would not call it a fix, but rather a workaround for a configuration
that behaves differently with systemd on focal version.
Now whether it is a simple issue to be fixed on systemd is another
sto
Hello,
As noted in the bug description, it is important to know that from Jammy
onward, the only way to exercise the bugfix is to use iptables-legacy
and not iptables which uses a newer library.
It also mitigates the impact on newer releases unless the -legacy
version is being used.
...Louis
--
Hi Robie,
This version of the package has been in Lunar since end of last year so
I assume that it has been largely in use since then.
..Louis
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Hello,
Thank you for your help in uploading & fixing the DEP8 tests.
I have tested the packages in -proposed using the test script in the SRU
description for :
- bionic
- focal
- jammy
- kinetic.
I confirm that the new package fix the problem in those distros.
Thanks.
** Tags removed: verifica
Hello, thanks for the update. Will test when they show up in proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454
Title:
iptables: segfault when renaming a ch
Hello,
Is there any chance of seeing this fix being SRUed to the stable
releases ?
Kind regards,
...Louis
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454
Title:
Great ! I appreciate your help on this.
...Louis
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454
Title:
iptables: segfault when renaming a chain
Status in iptable
Hello,
Sorry for the late response. It is most probably a mistake from my part.
Let me know if you want me to upload a corrected debdiff.
Regarding focal, since it was added by upstream, I thought that it would
be better to add it as well.
Kind regards,
...Louis
--
You received this bug notifi
Debdiff for Bionic
** Patch added: "iptables_1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5629161/+files/iptables_1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Debdiff for Jammy
** Patch added: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu5.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5629163/+files/iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu5.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
Debdiff for Focal
** Patch added: "iptables_1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5629162/+files/iptables_1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
Here are the debdiffs for Bionic, Focal and Jammy. I will let the
sponsor worry about the numbering for Kinetic & Lunar
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199245
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+ * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users
+
This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] :
This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the
- last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer.
Hello,
I was waiting for the kinetic upload to get through and I have the debdiffs
ready for the SRU.
I'll take care of that & the SRU template in the coming days.
...Louis
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ipt
Here is an autopkgtest run with the latest patch :
Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
autopkgtest [14:09:03]: test command17: chmod +x
./iptables/tests/shell/testcases/iptables/0007-zero-counters_0
./iptables/tests/shell/tes
Slightly modified debdiff which will only run the tests once.
** Patch removed: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5623037/+files/iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff
** Patch removed: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff"
Hello,
Thanks for picking this up. Reference to the test was added to
debian/test/control & test ran fine as we can see in the logs :
Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
autopkgtest [17:00:57]: test command18: chmod +x
./ipta
Here is the debdiff for upload to Kinetic.
** Patch added: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5622997/+files/iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Tou
** Description changed:
This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] :
This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the
last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer.
Commit 97bf4e68fc0794adba3243fd96f40f4568e7216f fixes this bug ups
In Progress
** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (louis)
** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (louis)
** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (
Public bug reported:
This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] :
This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the
last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer.
Commit 97bf4e68fc0794adba3243fd96f40f4568e7216f fixes this bug upstream.
This bug
Ok, I'll have a look at it; I only backported the Eoan fix to Bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805183
Title:
systemd-resolved constantly restarts on
For Info, I'm repearing an SRU upload for Bionic hopefully available by
End Of Day
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Log noise due to needless restart of resolved on lease expiry, maybe loss of
cached state?
+ Application that require Name Resolution may fail while the service is being
unnec
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (louis)
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notificatio
** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638695
Title:
Python 2.7
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Zesty)
Assignee: Louis Bo
Test performed for verification-done for :
- Xenial
- Yakkety
- Zesty
1) Installed unattended-upgrades from -proposed
2) Verified the status of the unattended-upgrades service. All displayed :
# systemctl status unattended-upgrades
● unattended-upgrades.service - Unattended Upgrades Shutdown
** Tags removed: sts-sru-needed verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600
Title:
unattended-u
riaged => In Progress
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Brief update to tell everyone that I have a fix ready for all stable
releases. I will update it to Artful soon and the SRU will follow soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https:
Targetting Zesty as the fix will come after release so as a SRU.
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: High
Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600
Title:
unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesyste
Too late now for sponsorship to Zesty. Since it will come with the next
rsyslog merge in 8.24.0-1, well go forward with the SRU post-merge of
the next rsyslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
nm-applet display each configured VPN connection as greyed out so it is
impossible to launch any of the openVPN connection from the network
indicator.
It is still possible to enable the VPN connection using :
$ nmcli conn up {VPN}
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.
y
BT headset so I'd be more than happy to help you tests.
Kind regards,
...Louis
--
Louis Bouchard
Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng.
Canonical Ltd
Ubuntu developer Debian Maintainer
GPG : 429D 7A3B DD05 B6F8 AF63 B9C4 8B3D 867C 823E 7A61
--
You received
A quick update on this issue. I have a solution ready to fix this.
Unfortunately it requires changing the WantedBy= statement, which
triggers a deb-systemd-helper bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797108
This has the effect of leaving the service disabled after upgrade. I'm
** Tags removed: sts-sru
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447715
Title:
dhclient -6: Can't bind to dhcp address: Cannot assign
** Tags removed: sts-sru
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642903
Title:
introduce disk/by-id (model_serial) symlinks for NVMe dr
** Tags removed: sts-sru
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647485
Title:
NVMe symlinks broken by devices with spaces in model or
** Tags removed: sts-sru
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665018
Title:
client tools ignore -h option without port number
Status i
** Tags removed: sts-sru
** Tags added: sts-sru-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648901
Title:
SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure
Status in krb5 package i
Here is a recap of my work and current status :
#1) when a system has a separated /var, the unit will hang since it is looking
for /var/run to be present and it has been unmounted.
#2) when using Unattended-Upgrade::InstallOnShutdown "true"; the upgrade never
completes as the query to the online
Here is a recap of my day of work :
The unattended-upgrades.service unit never runs the ExecStop because it
is not enabled as we see here :
# systemctl status unattended-upgrades.service
● unattended-upgrades.service - Unattended Upgrades Shutdown
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/unattende
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In Progress
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
--
You received this bug
@sergei-franco:
>From what I can tell, it works for you because changing the unit the way
you did simply disable execution of the unit. When running with such a
configuration either on Xenial or Zesty, I do not see any mention of
"Unattended Upgrades Shutdown" in the console output.
When limiting
@kay-diam:
I get what you mean. I also use KVM to debug the issue.
I'm going to switch to verification-failed to this one does not get
released and push the investigation further as there is another issue
that side-tracked me :
If Unattended-Upgrade::InstallOnShutdown is set to "true", it will s
@kay-diam
I don't understand your statement. The unit clearly get started. This is
from your log :
[ OK ] Stopped target Local File Systems.
[ OK ] Started Unattended Upgrades Shutdown. <<<
Unmounting /run/user/1000...
Unmounting /tmp...
[ OK ] Stopped Apply Kernel Variabl
Hello,
I am curious to hear about the context of your tests : my Zesty system
with a separated /var does show the problem prior to upgrade to
unattended-upgrades-0.93.1ubuntu2 and no longer hangs when the new
package is applied. There might be situations that I have not tested
where the issue coul
** Description changed:
+ [SRU justification]
+ This fix is needed to make sure that the system does not hang on shutdown
when /var is a speparate file system
+
+ [Impact]
+ System can hang up to 10 minutes if not fixed.
+
+ [Fix]
+ Change the systemd unit's ExecStart to an ExecStop so the unit
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600
Title:
unattended-up
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1654600 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600
This is a duplicate of another bug I'm working on and is caused by a
systemd ordering issue.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1654600
unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separa
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification b
Here is the pastebin for better readability :
http://paste.ubuntu.com/24078834/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638695
Title:
Python 2.7.12 performance r
Following the results of the previous comparison, i've used Jorge's
profiling example on the 'call_method' bench for trusty stock, no LTO,
no PGO and Xenial stock, no PGO and no LTO. Here are the results. Notice
the difference between Trusty Stock & Trusty nopgo, as opposed to the
execution profile
** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) => Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638
Hello,
Following doko's advice, I ran a set of test with PGO & LTO optimization
disabled.
Here are the results :
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tTlEOvMypwKwi99XHjvuQFE14_jpBBLy0-Mk6bjkvL0/edit#gid=1169944329
This may bring more light to the investigation as it appear that with
LTO & PGO
Hello,
The tests are run in LXC containers on a bare metal server with two
physical CPU, 6 cores, 2 threads per core (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640
0 @ 2.50GHz).
Following's doko's advice, I have built two new versions, one with LTO
optimisation disabled and the other one with PGO optimisation dis
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550983
Title:
Fails to start with "Couldn't open libGL.so.1" (missing dependency?)
Status in
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647485
Title:
NVMe symlinks broken by devices with spaces in model or serial strings
Status i
This is not a bug, but seems to happen when some required fields are not
yet filled. While the 'remote' field can be obvious,it is much less
evident when the interface refuses to allow the configuration to be
saved, because the certificate provided requires a password and the
password field has bee
Public bug reported:
When trying to create a new VPN connection with nm-connection-editor,
the new connection cannot be saved and the editor issues the following
error :
LC_ALL="C" nm-connection-editor
Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged.
** Message: Cann
** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665018
Title:
client
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bug
Here are the results of the comparative tests I ran :
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MyNBPVZlBeic1OLqVKe_bcPk2deO_pQs9trIfOFefM0/edit#gid=2034603487
It confirms the assumptions but unfortunately, rebuilding 2.7.12 without
the -fstack-protector-strong leads to worse performances than the
Hello,
Just to clarify something that I have just realized using :
$ pyperformance run -p={some python} means that {some python} will be
used to run PYPERFORMANCE, not to run the benchmarks !!! So changing -p
to use different builds of python will not run proper comparaison of the
different build
Ok, here is how I understand the situation.
According to the systemd documentation about [Unit] Before= :
"Given two units with any ordering dependency between them, if one unit
is shut down and the other is started up, the shutdown is ordered before
the start-up. It doesn't matter if the orderin
Hello,
This logic is correct. apt_pkg.get_lock(options.lock_file) is trying to
acquire a lockfile (/var/run/unattended-upgrades.lock) which is only
possible if no unattended-upgrade is already running. If it can acquire
the lock, it means that NO unattended-upgrade is running, hence shutdown
may p
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (lo
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.
Notes from online discussion :
==
src:isc-dhcp
Trusty:
4.2.4-7ubuntu12.8 -> (isc-dhcp-client)
Proposal A: 4.2.4-7ubuntu12.9 -> (isc-dhcp-client,
isc-dhcp-client-ddns), isc-dhcp-client Recommends: isc-dhcp-client-ddns
Proposal B: 4.
** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Xenial)
Here is how I understand it :
In Trusty, the isc-dhcp client provides the Dynamic DNS (ddns)
functionality and this one can be disabled. From Xenial onward, two
separate packages provide each of the possibilities.
AFAIU, the Trusty isc-dhcp package should become isc-dhcp which doesn't
provide th
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1647031
systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16471
I have libnss-resolve installed and still cannot connect to
gmail.google.com with 127.0.0.53.
Happy to help diagnose the issue though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1647031 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031
It definitively is. Thanks for spotting this
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1647031
systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records
--
You received this bug notificat
Public bug reported:
After upgrade to systemd-resolved, certain very well known subdomains
are no longer resolved. Their TLD do resolve correctly. Example given
with mail.google.com and google.com
On xenial :
$ nslookup mail.google.com
Server: 192.168.1.1
Address:192.168.1.1#53
N
** Tags removed: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1529815
Title:
InfiniBand DHCP flow with PRA and DHCP relay not working
Status in isc-dhcp packag
** Tags removed: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593378
Title:
crash in slap_bv2ad using repeated tags
Status in openldap package in Ubuntu:
Fi
** Tags removed: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567578
Title:
libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF
Status in libnl3 pack
** Tags removed: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920
Title:
zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the
deployment ima
** Tags removed: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089013
Title:
clvm startup script requires cman
Status in lvm2 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Sta
** Tags added: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567578
Title:
libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF
Status in libnl3 packag
** Also affects: libnl3 (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libnl3 (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 i
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920
Title:
zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the
deployment
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625667
Title:
Trusty: apt does not try next mirror if ind
** Description changed:
- When using the mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt functionality on
- Trusty, if the download of the index file fails, apt will not retry on
- another archive listed in mirrors.txt and will fail.
+ [SRU justification]
+ This fix is needed to allow correct archive mir
odification and upload
the fix.
Kind regards,
...Louis
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Invalid => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in
correctly on Xenial
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard)
Status
Marking dev + xenial as Invalid since it works from Xenial onward
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625667
Title:
Trusty: apt does not try next mirror if index f
Hello,
Looking at the history for this case, the SRU got rejected by pitti
(Comment #29) because of a v-failed on the fix for LP: #1568485 which is
also included in this SRU.
Since then, LP: #1568485 has been verified and is now fix-released.
There is no longer any reason to hold on the trusty SR
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1529815
Title:
InfiniBand DHCP flow with PRA and DHCP relay not working
Status in isc-dhcp pa
Testing with a JBL SB400 BT on a Lenovo Thinkpad T450S with the intel
ibt driver on F/W version 37081001103110e23 works correctly.
Doing a parallel test on my laptop (HP evo 850) that has :
[12383.666088] Bluetooth: hci0: read Intel version: 370710018002030d00
[12383.666095] Bluetooth: hci0: Inte
** Tags added: sts-sru
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1529815
Title:
InfiniBand DHCP flow with PRA and DHCP relay not working
Status in isc-dhcp package
** Also affects: packagekit (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569292
Title:
Can't join to AD d
** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy)
Status: In Progress
** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
S
leased
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534106
Title:
rsyslogd cra
** Patch added: "debian_8.16.0-1-ubuntu-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1539483/+attachment/4562903/+files/debian_8.16.0-1-ubuntu-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Patch added: "ubuntu-8.14.0-2ubuntu2-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1539483/+attachment/4562904/+files/ubuntu-8.14.0-2ubuntu2-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Patch removed: "debian_8.16.0-1-ubuntu-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1539483/+attachment/4562891/+files/debian_8.16.0-1-ubuntu-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff
** Patch removed: "ubuntu-8.14.0-2ubuntu2-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff"
https://bu
Updated d-u debdiff
** Patch added: "debian_8.16.0-1-ubuntu-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1539483/+attachment/4562891/+files/debian_8.16.0-1-ubuntu-8.16.0-1ubuntu1_v2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
