[Touch-packages] [Bug 1709603] Re: apt {upgrade, install, source} require an update call first

2018-04-06 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
Alternate: - a `-u`/`--update` option that unconditionally performs an apt update as an option to apt itself, since every subcommand except `update` and `edit-sources` can potentially benefit from an `update` beforehand. For `edit-sources`, have it update after instead of before, and for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1683576] [NEW] cd with multiple directory argument fails

2017-04-17 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
Public bug reported: In bash 4.4, a new behaviour was introduced for cd, where it would complain if multiple arguments are provided. From config-top.h [1]: /* Define CD_COMPLAINS if you want the non-standard, but sometimes-desired error messages about multiple directory arguments to `cd'.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661041] [NEW] dnscache script breaks if /run/resolvconf/interface is empty

2017-02-01 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
Public bug reported: Following Debian bug 318464, a script was added to resolvconf which helpfully overwrites dnscache's @ file with root servers if the there are no nameservers offered. In my case, the system, which is a DNS server itself, does not use DHCP or other network-provided DNS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1559482] Re: add-apt-repository manpage does not mention new -u option

2016-03-24 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
That makes sense. This is my second merge attempt. The first, iirc, was against https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/software-properties, because Launchpad offered it as the default. I deleted that and picked the wily one manually because that's what I branched from. Should I delete the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1559482] [NEW] add-apt-repository manpage does not mention new -u option

2016-03-19 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
Public bug reported: The add-apt-repository tool has apparently gained a new option to update the package cache. However, the manpage does not reflect this (as seen on http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/wily/en/man1/add-apt- repository.1.html or http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482641] Re: Lightdm (and GDM) source .profile as bash, indirectly sourcing .bashrc

2015-08-09 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
Presumably this isn't important enough to make an SRU, right, Gunnar? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482641 Title: Lightdm (and GDM) source .profile as

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482641] [NEW] Lightdm (and GDM) source .profile as bash, indirectly sourcing .bashrc

2015-08-07 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
Public bug reported: The fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/678421 leads to `.profile` being sourced by bash instead of dash. This leads `.bashrc` being sourced indirectly via .profile. IMHO, `.bashrc` should not be sourced even *once* in this situation. I suggest that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482641] Re: Lightdm (and GDM) source .profile as bash, indirectly sourcing .bashrc

2015-08-07 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
** Description changed: The fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/678421 leads to `.profile` being sourced by bash instead of dash. This leads - `.bashrc` being sourced indirectly twice: once by bash when the script - started, and once via .profile. IMHO, `.bashrc` should

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1335289] Re: Shutdown timer regression

2014-08-27 Thread Murukesh Mohanan
** Package changed: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) = unity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335289 Title: Shutdown timer regression Status in “unity”