[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539689] Re: package lvm2 2.02.133-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I'm running do-release-upgrade on 14.04 to get to 16.04. This is one of the errors that appears. E: Version ‘2.02.133-1ubuntu10’ for ‘libdevmapper1.02.1’ was not found https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/libdevmapper1.02.1 suggests libdevmapper1.02.1 (2:1.02.110-1ubuntu10) is available with the source package being lvm2_2.02.133-1ubuntu10. Why is 2.02.133 being referenced when 1.02.110 is what's available? Also, this bug is of 'critical' importance but has seen no action since 2016. :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539689 Title: package lvm2 2.02.133-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in lvm2 package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: I was trying to upgrade the system to see new updates on the Ubuntu 16.04. But it couldn't be finished because the operation stopped while upgrading lvm2. So I guess it broke the OS because I can't do the "apt-get upgrade" anymore. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: lvm2 2.02.133-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.3.0-7.18-generic 4.3.3 Uname: Linux 4.3.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.19.4-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.366 Date: Fri Jan 29 16:32:35 2016 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160128) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1 apt 1.1.10 SourcePackage: lvm2 Title: package lvm2 2.02.133-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/1539689/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 562894] Re: wrong date format in "ls -la" output
Hi Maik, If you think you are confirming the original bug report still exists then you need to change the status above from `New' to `Confirmed'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562894 Title: wrong date format in "ls -la" output Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: bash My system is set to german output but the long ls listing shows wrong/us date format: tr@tr-ubuntu:~$ env|grep LANG LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 GDM_LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 tr@tr-ubuntu:~$ date Mi 14. Apr 11:13:46 CEST 2010 tr@tr-ubuntu:~$ touch myFile tr@tr-ubuntu:~$ ls -la myFile -rw-r--r-- 1 tr tr 0 2010-04-14 11:13 myFile Here is an example of Redhat EL5 which gives different/right output: tr@tr-ubuntu:~$ ssh xxx tr@xxx's password: Last login: Wed Apr 14 11:12:53 2010 from yyy [tr@xxx ~]$ touch myFile [tr@xxx ~]$ ls -la myFile -rw-rw-r-- 1 tr tr 0 14. Apr 11:15 myFile [tr@xxx ~]$ env|grep LANG LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Apr 14 11:07:53 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: bash 4.0-5ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: bash Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/562894/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1010421] Re: Text antialiasing is green.....
It seems odd gimp doesn't override the system and user's configuration of the rgba attribute to none, e.g. by providing a /etc/gimp/2.0/fonts.conf, e.g. https://gist.github.com/csaez/5d8286b134266e51c6cb76fd218d1d5d If they think that a user might want to produce a PNG with rgba set for a particular sub-pixel layout then they could have a UI choice on the text-tool's options, just as they currently have anti-alias to override the system and user. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010421 Title: Text antialiasing is green. Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: g. So upgraded to Gimp 2.8 and now text antialaising is green. Use white text on a black background to check it out. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1010421/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1427600] Re: apport-unpack: ValueError: ['UserGroups'] has no binary content
Ubuntu 15.10, apport 2.19.1-0ubuntu5. Trying to unpack to a non- existing directory. Get Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apport-unpack", line 73, in pr.extract_keys(f, bin_keys, dir) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 253, in extract_keys [item for item, element in b64_block.items() if element is False]) $ grep UserGroups /var/crash/_usr_bin_hhvm.33.crash | cat -A UserGroups: $ $ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1427600 Title: apport-unpack: ValueError: ['UserGroups'] has no binary content Status in apport package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in apport source package in Xenial: Confirmed Bug description: When running apport-unpack to get at a core dump laney@raleigh> sudo apport-unpack _usr_lib_x86_64-linux-gnu_urfkill_urfkilld.0.crash ~/temp/zozoz [sudo] password for laney: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apport-unpack", line 73, in pr.extract_keys(f, bin_keys, dir) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 253, in extract_keys [item for item, element in b64_block.items() if element is False]) ValueError: ['UserGroups'] has no binary content laney@raleigh> apport-cli --version 2.16.2 It's not terrible, because most files are unpacked (those which sort before UserGroups, I guess). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: apport 2.16.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-7.7-generic 3.19.0 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-7-generic x86_64 ApportLog: ApportVersion: 2.16.2-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Mar 3 10:09:26 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-07 (876 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Beta amd64 (20121007) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to vivid on 2013-05-07 (665 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1427600/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1036859] Re: stdint.h defines PRIx16 and similar in unhelful way
This bug, PRIx16 is x rather than hx, reported 2012-08, has just bit me. Is Ubuntu now doing a disservice to the community by still accepting bug reports, but acting as a nothing happens sink for them with more chance of a fix if they were reported upstream in the first place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036859 Title: stdint.h defines PRIx16 and similar in unhelful way Status in eglibc package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Ubuntu 11.04 reference: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/inttypes.h.html inttypes.h defines macros for fixed integer types. The ones for 8- and 16-bit types are currently the same as the 32-bit types, which pretty much makes them useless. PRIx16 is x I suggest it should be hx PRIx8 is xI suggest it should be hhx Otherwise, only by excruciatingly correct typecasting in the printf can you get the correct output for something like int16_t this = -1; printf(% PRIx16 \n, this); As it stands, it will print 8 hex digits. It makes more sense for it to print 4. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1036859/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
