[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908473] Re: rsyslog-relp: imrelp module leaves sockets in CLOSE_WAIT state which leads to file descriptor leak

2021-01-20 Thread Richard Laager
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908473 Title: rsyslog-relp: imrelp module leaves

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908473] Re: rsyslog-relp: imrelp module leaves sockets in CLOSE_WAIT state which leads to file descriptor leak

2021-01-20 Thread Richard Laager
I tested this on Focal. I installed librelp0 and restart rsyslog. Prior to the change, sockets were stacking up in CLOSE-WAIT (both from normal use and from the netcat test). After the change, sockets are being closed correctly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908473] Re: rsyslog-relp: imrelp module leaves sockets in CLOSE_WAIT state which leads to file descriptor leak

2021-01-06 Thread Richard Laager
The test package fixes the issue for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908473 Title: rsyslog-relp: imrelp module leaves sockets in CLOSE_WAIT state

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-16 Thread Richard Laager
First I reverted isc-dhcp-server back to the original focal version, since I had an updated version from the PPA: $ sudo apt install isc-dhcp-server=4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5 isc-dhcp-common=4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5 Then I install the update packages: $ sudo apt update $ sudo apt install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-15 Thread Richard Laager
Andrew, 1:9.11.16+dfsg-3~build1 is wrong. The correct version is 1:9.11.16+dfsg-3~ubuntu1 (~ubuntu1 instead of ~build1). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-12 Thread Richard Laager
Excellent. I'm available to test the -proposed update for focal whenever it is ready. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872118 Title: [SRU] DHCP Cluster

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Richard Laager
Jorge, I agree with Gianfranco Costamagna that a rebuild of isc-dhcp is NOT required. Why do you think it is? Presumably BIND also uses these libraries? If so, it seems like the Test Case should involve making sure BIND still seems to work, and that BIND should be mentioned in the Regression

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-06 Thread Richard Laager
No crashes to report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872118 Title: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours Status in DHCP: New Status in bind9-libs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-06 Thread Richard Laager
Jorge, it sounds like ISC might think there is a more fundamental issue here: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/121#note_152804 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues #121 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/121 -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-05 Thread Richard Laager
Jorge, I have been running for 25 hours on the patched version with no crashes on either server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872118 Title: DHCP

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-04 Thread Richard Laager
I ran: sudo apt install \ isc-dhcp-server=4.4.1-2.1ubuntu6~ppa1 \ libdns-export1109=1:9.11.16+dfsg-3~ppa1 \ libirs-export161=1:9.11.16+dfsg-3~ppa1 \ libisc-export1105=1:9.11.16+dfsg-3~ppa1 && \ sudo systemctl restart isc-dhcp-server The restart at the end was just for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-01 Thread Richard Laager
** Bug watch added: gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/issues #128 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/issues/128 ** Also affects: dhcp via https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/issues/128 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-01 Thread Richard Laager
I was able to reproduce this with 4.4.2 plus the Ubuntu packaging. I did not try with stock 4.4.2 from source. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872118

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] [NEW] tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-07-25 Thread Richard Laager
Public bug reported: rsyslogd: error during parsing file /etc/rsyslog.d/FILENAME.conf, on or before line 22: imrelp: librelp does not support input parameter 'tls.tlscfgcmd'; it probably is too old (1.5.0 or higher should be fine); ignoring setting now. [v8.2001.0 try

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872863] Re: QEMU/KVM display is garbled when booting from kernel EFI stub due to missing bochs-drm module

2020-05-11 Thread Richard Laager
I have confirmed that the fix in -proposed fixes the issue for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872863 Title: QEMU/KVM display is garbled when booting

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1803203] Re: Support preferred_lft for IPv6 addresses

2019-05-29 Thread Richard Laager
Currently, addresses is a "sequence of scalars" (aka a list). Here is the example from the Netplan reference you quoted: addresses: [192.168.14.2/24, "2001:1::1/64"] This can, currently, also be written in this form (quotes optional): addresses: - 192.168.14.2/24 - "2001:1::1/64" I actually

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812760] Re: networkd: [Route] PreferredSource not working in *.network files

2019-04-08 Thread Richard Laager
I was able to verify this on Bionic: rlaager@bison:~$ ip -6 route show 2600:2600::/64 dev ens3 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium fe80::/64 dev ens3 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium default via 2600:2600::254 dev ens3 proto static metric 1024 pref medium rlaager@bison:~$ sudo apt update ...

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812760] Re: networkd: [Route] PreferredSource not working in *.network files

2019-03-03 Thread Richard Laager
I was an affected user. I have confirmed that the package from bionic- proposed works. I do not have any systems installed with Cosmic. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1368411] Re: Cannot insert IPV6 rule before IPV4 rules

2018-10-08 Thread Richard Laager
Attached is an updated version of the patch that builds. The previous one was failing because there's a test case that makes sure an "insert 2" of an IPv6 rule fails. That's enforcing the existence of the behavior that here we are arguing is a bug. ** Patch added: "Updated patch"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1368411] Re: Cannot insert IPV6 rule before IPV4 rules

2018-10-08 Thread Richard Laager
Taking into account the two proposed patches, and what I believe the code to be doing, attached is a patch I believe is suitable for inclusion. ** Patch added: "0005-lp1368411.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1368411/+attachment/5198539/+files/0005-lp1368411.patch --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1727202] Re: [17.10 regression] AppArmor denial: Failed name lookup - disconnected path

2017-12-13 Thread Richard Laager
I'm seeing the same errors with NTPsec (a fork of this ntpd, which I have packaged for Debian) on 16.04. The apparmor policy is copied from this ntp package. I'm not able to reproduce the problem at will, but it seems to happen regularly. The proposed change seems to have resolved it. -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-05 Thread Richard Laager
Does ZFS actually have any translations? There are no .po files in the source and no .mo files in the binary package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365874] Re: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, 14.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS do not support ext4 metadata checksumming

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
This is fixed in 16.10. Is there a plan to backport this? I'm guessing not, because of the risk of regressions. If there's no plans to SRU, then this bug should probably be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1601997] Re: Ubuntu 16.10 installer sets metadata_csum option on ext4 partition which is incompatible with other LTS Ubuntu versions

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
I don't see how turning on a new feature is a bug. ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1601997

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-26 Thread Richard Laager
The fix was merged upstream here: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/792517389fad5c495a2738b61c2e9c65dedaaa9a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1618726] Re: ifup & ifdown crash if multiple interfaces are listed in no-scripts

2016-09-14 Thread Richard Laager
The package from proposed works. I tested version 0.8.10ubuntu1.1. The diff looks correct. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1618726] Re: ifup & ifdown crash if multiple interfaces are listed in no-scripts

2016-09-13 Thread Richard Laager
I did not forward it. I sometimes do, sometimes don't, depending on a lot of factors. In this case, even though I assumed it would affect Debian, I was hesitant to claim the existence of a high priority bug if I hadn't personally verified it. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1618726] Re: ifup & ifdown crash if multiple interfaces are listed in no-scripts

2016-08-31 Thread Richard Laager
** Patch added: "A fix for yakkety" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1618726/+attachment/4731336/+files/ifupdown-fix-1618726-yakkety.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1618726] Re: ifup & ifdown crash if multiple interfaces are listed in no-scripts

2016-08-31 Thread Richard Laager
** Patch added: "A fix for xenial" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1618726/+attachment/4731337/+files/ifupdown-fix-1618726-xenial.debdiff ** Description changed: - This is a trivially reproducible crash in ifup/ifdown. + This is a trivially reproducible crash in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1618726] [NEW] ifup & ifdown crash if multiple interfaces are listed in no-scripts

2016-08-31 Thread Richard Laager
Public bug reported: This is a trivially reproducible crash in ifup/ifdown. Steps to reproduce: 1) echo no-scripts foo bar >> /etc/network/interfaces 2) ifup baz Expected results: Unknown interface baz Actual results: Segmentation fault (core dumped) It's irrelevant whether the second

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-07-29 Thread Richard Laager
chiluk is looking to work on this for upstream. I might jump in too. https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4680 ** Bug watch added: Github Issue Tracker for ZFS #4680 https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4680 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 87023] Re: sudo option "tty_tickets" gives false sense of security due to reused pts numbers

2016-04-25 Thread Richard Laager
I might be overstepping here, but I'm marking this as Fix Released. I can confirm, as with comment #16, that this is no longer an issue. I'm on Vivid. ** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 346609] Re: Sun Java 6 JRE does not use ca-certificates for SSL

2016-04-25 Thread Richard Laager
AFAIK, Sun Java is no longer in Ubuntu. Even if it is, it's probably a new version than 6. I'm sure this is broken, but nobody is going to fix it. I just don't care any more. ** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 44880] Re: test man page minor error

2016-04-25 Thread Richard Laager
** Changed in: help2man (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid ** Changed in: help2man Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 479405] Re: --bwlimit option uses KiB/s, but is documented as (what amounts to) kB/s

2016-01-12 Thread Richard Laager
This has been fixed in at least Ubuntu vivid. ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479405

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1479652] [NEW] [patch] ntpd rejects source UDP ports less than 123 as bogus

2015-07-30 Thread Richard Laager
Public bug reported: [Title copied from Debian bug, which was not filed by me. Description below is mine.] If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the packet is silently ignored by ntpd. This is occurring in our environment due to NAT. Attached is the patch already