[Touch-packages] [Bug 1932537] Re: CUPS + SSSD: cannot access local CUPS web interface with domain user (apparmor problem)

2021-07-02 Thread Robert Euhus
Hi everyone, It would be really nice to have any kind of feedback on this bug report. Is there anything else I can do? Do You need more info? Thanks, Robert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890858] Re: AppArmor profile causes QEMU/KVM - Not Connected

2021-06-18 Thread Robert Euhus
I have successfully tested the libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.10 packages from focal-proposed as requested. The following packages where upgraded to 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.10: libvirt-clients libvirt-daemon libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-rbd libvirt-daemon-system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1932537] [NEW] CUPS + SSSD: cannot access local CUPS web interface with domain user (apparmor problem)

2021-06-18 Thread Robert Euhus
Public bug reported: [Summary] My domain user can not access the local CUPS web interface due to apparmor denials. Adding the following two lines to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.cupsd fixes it: /var/lib/sss/pipes/private/pam rw, unix (bind) type=dgram addr=@userdb-*, [Details] I have a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1073138] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins should be replaced by Unattended-Upgrade::Origins-Pattern

2021-02-17 Thread Robert Euhus
Please change this config for the next ubuntu release! ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1073138] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins should be replaced by Unattended-Upgrade::Origins-Pattern

2021-02-17 Thread Robert Euhus
Hi all, especially Michael Vogt, while I can understand that You don't want do change the config during a release, I can not see any reason why it is still not changed for *new releases* of ubuntu. The bug report is 8 years old by now. There is no advantage of keeping "Allowed-Origin", but many

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1440608] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal wants to remove all kernels except the latest one

2016-01-18 Thread Robert Euhus
Jarno Suni, thanks for the reply. First I would like to stress, that I still don't think that running all the KERNELS postINSTALL hooks while REMOVING the -extra package is the right thing todo. The only thing I can see that is really needed is the recreation of the initrd on installation and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1440608] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal wants to remove all kernels except the latest one

2016-01-18 Thread Robert Euhus
Hi all, sorry, the apt-auto-removal script attached above contained some debug echo statements. Which were harmless, but unnessecary. Testing and thinking a bit more about the problem I have come to the conclusion, that upon removal of a linux-image-extra package the only right thing to do is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1440608] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal wants to remove all kernels except the latest one

2016-01-15 Thread Robert Euhus
The problem is that on purge/removal the linux-image-extra package runs all the kernel post-*install*-hooks in /etc/kernel/postinst.d (as its postrm hook), including the /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal hook. The 'to-be-removed'-version of the kernel is given as an argument and thereby

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1440608] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal wants to remove all kernels except the latest one

2016-01-15 Thread Robert Euhus
** Also affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440608 Title: