** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuil
See https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/blob/master/NEWS -> release
1.5.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077712
Title:
lastlog does not capture all logi
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to report this issue.
Presumably, your boost.asio was not built against the libssl-dev headers
provided in Ubuntu, since in that version those function names aren't
provided as symbols but rather as preprocessor aliases to the more
modern TLS_* alternatives (see
htt
FWIW, it's not a regression as the behaviour is the same in Focal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077883
Title:
usermod silently fails modifying group memb
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1077804
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077804
** Also affects: fink via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077804
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I looked at the s390-tools build logs and have verified that the -fno-
omit-frame-pointer flags that were present in the previous build are now
gone on both ppc64el and s390x but not on amd64. In addition,
-mbackchain is present on s390x.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
zlib has just migrate to the release pocket (along with glibc), closing
this bug.
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification beca
I checked the gcc packages, and indeed the lib32z1-dev dependency has
been fixed, including in the oracular release pocket. I think we're
hitting a bug in reverse-depends, since it shows up even for riscv64:
❯ reverse-depends -b -a riscv64 lib32z1-dev
Reverse-Build-Depends
=
*
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076898
Title:
Numeric name is accepted as valid u
Public bug reported:
In particular, testing against a version of glibc in -proposed will fail
with the following error:
3784s libc6-dbg : Depends: libc6 (= 2.39-0ubuntu9) but 2.40-1ubuntu1 is
to be installed
(2.39-0ubuntu9 is the version in the release pocket, 2.40-1ubuntu1 is
the one in -propo
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~hectorcao/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+git/shadow/+merge/471145
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076898
Tit
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073992
Title:
Please merge zlib 1:1.3.dfsg+really1.3.1-1 into
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ravi Kant Sharma (ravi-sharma) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073992
Title:
Ple
This is fixed by doko in 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1ubuntu3 but it's currently stuck
in -proposed due to bug 2075567
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in
** Also affects: gcc-14 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: ftbfs update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075567
Title:
Frank, can you confirm that you got in touch with the upstream author
about it?
I probably could "fix" it by sprinkling casts all over the place, which
could be wildly unsafe depending on the exact properties of __int128, or
by actually using a local __int128 variable and memcpy it or something
li
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Tou
This feature should be postponed to the 2.31 version (i.e. the 25.04
cycle), as we don't fully understand the typical usage patterns of
apport-retrace. We're talking about a substantial change, and having it
targeted to 2.30 (which needs to be cut in the coming two weeks) would
be rushing it, even
:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: s390x
unsat-dependency: gcc-multilib:s390x
** Affects: zlib (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Simon Chopin (schopin)
Status: New
** Tags: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
To help in the development of apport we're using the chaos-marmosets set
of binaries, which triggers various crashes. In particular, we're using
/usr/bin/divide-by-zero which does as its name indicates, which
naturally triggers a native crash.
However, GDB fails on s390x. Not
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~hectorcao/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+git/shadow/+merge/469556
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073338
Tit
Public bug reported:
Despite the distribution having enabled frame pointers globally, the
binaries shipped by libdmapsharing don't have frame pointers.
It is likely due to the build system being pretty screwed up: it builds
the library once using the CFLAGS, then rebuilds it with custom flags
for
** Changed in: apport
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068933
Title:
all reports with LaunchpadPrivate in them are tagged
Here's how to reproduce this in a LXD VM:
Download Ubuntu 24.04 Desktop image into ~/Downloads
Import the ISO
$ lxc storage volume import default ~/Downloads/ubuntu-24.04-desktop-amd64.iso
24.04-desktop --type=iso
Prepare a LXD VM
$ lxc init --empty --vm lxd-noble-fde -c limits.memory=6GiB -c l
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060676 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060676
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060676
login: remove pam_lastlog.so from config
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is s
The issue was introduced with https://github.com/shadow-
maint/shadow/pull/237
Basically, the previous group validation was done using glibc's getgrid
directly, which was presumably coping well with the RO status of
/etc/group, but that poses consistency problems because you could add a
local user
2-22T14:20:00
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to softwa
** Summary changed:
- Software sources not correctly updated after upgrade and/or new installs
+ [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822
+ Software Sources is not compatible with deb822
** Summary changed:
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063200
Title:
useradd --extrausers --groups tries to lock /etc/group
Status in shadow packa
Quick repro steps:
❯ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble shadow
Creating shadow
Starting shadow
❯ lxc exec shadow bash
root@shadow:~# mv /etc /etc_write
root@shadow:~# mkdir /etc
root@shadow:~# mount -o bind,ro /etc_write /etc
root@shadow:~# useradd --extrausers --groups somegroup somenewuser
useradd: c
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063200
Title:
useradd --extraus
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214
Title:
Software sources
I just tested 5.21/stable and couldn't reproduce as it properly disable
the /proc/sys/kernel/apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_userns and
/proc/sys/kernel/apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_unconfined that would
otherwise have caused those denials.
Marking as incomplete until you can reproduce with 5.21/
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214
Ti
Thanks for the follow-up!
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060965
Title:
liblxc is missing in 24
** Also affects: apport-symptoms (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Description changed:
Apport version: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Ubuntu-Server 24.04 Beta amd64 (20240410.1)
- See attached screenshot for error.
+ /us
What now remains to be done is to heavily patch faketime to, when on
armhf:
1/ use the proper symbols from glibc (e.g. __clock_gettime64 instead of
__clock_gettime)
2/ expose those symbols instead of the legacy 32-bit ones.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491
Title:
Can't run snap
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
- click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on armhf,
- and possibly on all archs.
+ click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on ppc64el,
+ s390x.
- armhf
Oh, hang on. The bash build has apparently been uploaded just a day
after the t64 gcc, which means gcc was presumably still building when
the bash build started:
gcc-13 armhf 13.2.0-13ubuntu1 (from the bash build logs)
A bash rebuild should "fix" this somewhat. Well, at least a little bit.
** Al
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to liblocale-gettext-perl in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052930
Title:
liblocale-gettext-perl autopkg
It turns out the fix was already in the upstream repo as a PR for a
while (couple of years?). I've submitted a Salsa MR to proactively
address the issue before it shows up there:
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/liblocale-gettext-
perl/-/merge_requests/1
and I've uploaded the s
Unless I'm missing something, the issue you're linking is about glib,
not glibc. Reassigning the bug accordingly.
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification becau
Public bug reported:
Release of Ubuntu: Noble
Package Version: 5.72-0ubuntu1
My headset changed profile from A2DP to HSP as I received a phone call on my
phone (the headset can connect to multiple BT devices).
I'd expect the system to adapt to the new profile (add a new source, change the
prope
Public bug reported:
As a header to all .conf files in systemd there's a comment saying
# Entries in this file show the compile time defaults. Local configuration
# should be created by either modifying this file (or a copy of it placed in
# /etc/ if the original file is shipped in /usr/), or by
We had a mitigation for this in glibc but the latest change from simply
denying the unshare() call to allowing it but then denying anything
requiring capabilities *presumably* broke the glibc test suite again.
I'm only basing this from looking at the test logs, as I'm temporarily
unable to run auto
@enr0n, yes, I did restart systemd-networkd after creating
/etc/systemd/network/10-netplan-vlan1.network.d/keep_master.conf.
If you want to reproduce, the steps outlined in the bug descriptions
should provide you with a simple reproducer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
@enr0n, the proposal to add:
bridges:
br0:
interfaces: [vlan1]
To the network config defeats the purpose. The goal is to not have to do
double configuration. The bridge is define in LXD, the vlan1 only in
netplan.
The other proposed fix of `KeepMaster=true` snippet in
/etc/systemd/network/
FYI, snapd is a "base-less" snap:
$ lxc launch ubuntu-minimal-daily:22.04 c1
$ lxc shell c1
root@c1:~# snap list
No snaps are installed yet. Try 'snap install hello-world'.
root@c1:~# snap install snapd
2024-02-15T21:17:09Z INFO Waiting for automatic snapd restart...
snapd 2.61.1 from Canonical✓ i
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020110
Title:
Migrate netplan settings to this package
Status in network-manager pa
Per discussions in the appropriate PR for Calamares[1], this should be
done in network-manager itself.
The appeal is more custom approaches. Downstreams and vendors of Ubuntu.
[1] https://github.com/calamares/calamares/pull/2284
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
Public bug reported:
The autopkgtests for liblocale-gettext-perl fail against glibc 2.39 with
the following errors:
autopkgtest [15:27:03]: test autodep8-perl-build-deps: [---
243s t/bind.t ...
243s 1..1
243s # Running under perl version 5.036000 for linux
243s # Current
After further investigations into the gzip issue in python 3.12, it
turns out there was an undocumented change: it is now a buffered writer.
So the fire&forget pattern used in the snippet above doesn't work
anymore, we now need to use it as a proper IO object instead.
I still think this should be
** Also affects: python3.12 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
-debian/rules override_dh_auto_test
+ [Description]
+
+ Python 3.12 gzip.GZipFile.write() outputs truncated data in some cases
+ (maybe all?)
+
+ [Test Plan]
+
+ Run the following scrip
Hi!
Thank you for taking the time to report this. Could you confirm on which
version of Ubuntu you're seeing this issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libtimezonemap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
This was verified on Mantic with -proposed (1:5.0.1-0ubuntu8~23.10.1).
Here's how:
$ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:23.10 c2
Creating c2
Starting c2
$ lxc shell c2
root@c2:~# apt-get update
...
root@c2:~# apt-get install -Vy liblxc-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Read
This was verified on Jammy with -proposed
(1:5.0.0~git2209-g5a7b9ce67-0ubuntu1.1). Here's how:
$ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:22.04 c1
Creating c1
Starting c1
root@c1:~# apt-get update
...
root@c1:~# apt-get install -Vy liblxc-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading
** Description changed:
In removing the LXD snap from preseeding in the server seed for Ubuntu
- 24.04 as part LP #2051346 [1] we also removed the snaps snap and the
+ 24.04 as part LP #2051346 [1] we also removed the snapd snap and the
core22 snap.
This means that are subsequent snap ins
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: pango1.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
So, after some fairly exhausting debugging, I kind of gave up on that
bug, but as a last ditch effort I tried a rebuild against the latest
snapshot (even though the changelog didn't seem particularly relevant),
nd... Now it builds.
I'm so tired.
--
You received this bug notificat
@bdrung, I just noticed this package is now in universe in Noble. Is the
demotion related to this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047939
Title:
Let tzd
** Patch added: "delta-delta.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/+bug/2049885/+attachment/5741436/+files/delta-delta.patch
** Changed in: console-setup (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Using a fast HTTPS server (same LAN as client), the `main.py` tests goes
from ~8s to ~2.5s:
# time python3 /tmp/main.py
Distro: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
Python Version: 3.10.12 (main, Nov 20 2023, 15:14:05) [GCC 11.4.0]
OpenSSL Version: OpenSSL 3.0.2 15 Mar 2022
0 1 2 3 ... 99
real0m8.163s
user
In fact, the same but updated note was already on
https://documentation.ubuntu.com/lxd/en/latest/installing/#install-lxd-
from-source where it mentions that it affects 22.04 onward while the one
you dug up says 23.04/23.10 are not affected ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification be
I'm currently focused on cataloguing failures, but I'll try to
investigate it if nobody has picked it up by then.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049881
Tit
Public bug reported:
Hi,
The package pango1.0 failed to build during the recent full archive test
rebuild against a snapshot of the the development branch for the
upcoming glibc 2.39, expected to land in Noble. This was subsequently
confirmed locally against a more recent snapshot.
Full logs for
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
Hi! Thanks for raising the issue.
Given the relative complexity of the patch and the low number of
affected people, I don't feel we should be shipping this as a Ubuntu-
specific patch. It might be a better idea for you to raise the issue on
the upstream ML, possibly amending the original patch to
** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049352
Title:
Package BlueZ 5.72 for Noble
Status
This was missing a build dependency on python3-pygments (which is in
Main), I added it.
Testing well with my Beats Flex, YouTube Music with the Firefox Nightly
snap. I can adjust the latency offset with no issue, and blueman DTRT
with connecting and disconnecting. Popped open journalctl and syslog
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040011
Title:
[SRU] Ensure supported codenames are accur
** Also affects: iptables (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049318
Title:
free(): double free det
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047982
Title:
Highlighting of patches offers insufficie
sarnold, good point!
Holger: I can't pretend speaking for the SRU team, but I'd be willing to
bet that having "the fix is trivial" as a test plan would result in the
SRU being trivially rejected :-).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
It looks like I was overly strict with the MIR compliance, which sort of
balances out this bug as a whole. :)
After it migrates, Gianfranco or myself will try reverting ubuntu2 to
see if we can push those two packages forward.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/13825
I will test this first in Debian, upload it there, then do a merge.
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vi
> Please also remember to commit proposed changes to
https://git.launchpad.net/~bluetooth/bluez
Force pushing my local commits over, sorry not sorry. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https:/
> Simon, ell already has a recent approved MIR LP: #1971738
Er, the binary packages in question don't.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047780
Title:
I'm pretty shocked, I ran a local sbuild with this and yet it still
FTBFS. Doing an ubuntu2 upload as a fixup.
I would think that because we use the published tarball and not the
upstream source like Debian does, that would affect our ability to ship
the -test package.
Something's up with my loca
At first I was just going to say, ell-dev isn't built on i386 and it's
not arch:all, of course it will need an i386 allowlist entry! However,
this is the output I'm getting:
```
$ check-mir
Checking support status of build dependencies...
* debhelper-compat does not exist (pure virtual?)
* libel
** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In Progress
** Summary changed:
- BlueZ release 5.71
+ BlueZ release 5.71 and merge from Debian
** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)
--
You received this bug notifi
Reviewed and uploaded.
For the particular patch series attached to this very bug, I'm seeing
the patchset as two distincts parts. First are a few optimization
patches by being more selective in flushing some caches, whereas the
second part are behaviour changes that belong more in the realm of fix
Daniel, I don't want you to feel burned over this. That wiki page does
seem quite rational, and I appreciate that you linked it. I'm reading
some mixed feelings, so let me be clear: thank you for the work you
*are* able to put into this.
Both Gianfranco and I are Ubuntu Core Developers but are als
Is there any terminal in which the default is actually readable?
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04-feature-freeze
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =&g
> In other words, asking an Archive Admin to build binfmt-support on
i386.
I have stopped short of this so far because I'm entirely unsure if we
still need that build dependency in the first place. Debian doesn't have
it, and I'm not sure I see rationale on our end for it.
There is probably somet
Following the dependency chain through to the cause for the i386 builds,
binfmt-support should be added to the i386 allowlist. This may be a bug
in evolution-data-server in the case libebook-contacts-1.2-4 can build
without libphonenumber8-protobuf32 - for now, blanket-disabling that
dependency in
This is now blocking a Lubuntu feature goal. I tested this locally with
my bluetooth earbuds, and have been streaming audio with no problems.
Uploaded Gianfranco's packaging with some minor tweaks.
Please, we *need* to merge this from Debian *this* cycle. The Security
Team will NOT be happy when
Rik mentioned a common mistake that I've been trying harder to catch
(but didn't in this case, to my great frustration)...
If we're doing a merge and an orig tarball already exists in Debian,
always always ALWAYS grab that one instead of using uscan or finding the
tarball yourself. It breaks tooli
The reason I essentially blindsponsored this was out of faith and
courtesy for the Desktop Team.
Lubuntu does similar things, but we have a merge party from Debian once
a cycle. If your response would be "we don't follow Debian," *I get it*,
but once or twice a cycle a merge should really be looke
Hi! Thank you for filing a bug and contributing to Ubuntu.
We're able to partially confirm this bug by simply having cloud-init
installed on our system and running `ubuntu-bug libc6`, which will start
off by printing 'cloud-init run data not found on system. Unable to add
cloud-specific data.' on
Little bit of data here. For some reason glib2.0 is thinking we're in a
GDB context and so is spitting out a SIGTRAP rather than the expected
SIGABRT, see
https://sources.debian.org/src/glib2.0/2.78.3-1/glib/gmessages.c/#L556
Now, why is it aborting I'm not too sure. The stack trace gives us a
hin
Hi again!
Thanks for filing the multiple detailed bugs, this is greatly
appreciated as it makes triaging much easier!
In this instance, I'm closing this as Invalid since this output isn't
directly apport/ubuntu-bug related, it's the output of some tools we're
invoking under the hood, and/or GTK b
Hi, thanks for taking the time to report this issue and contributing to
Ubuntu :)
I confirmed this issue (along with the one with firefox snap vs deb).
This is a bit bigger of an issue, as it means some non-privileged users
won't be able to report issues (or at least would give up as soon as the
Hi, thanks for taking the time to report this issue and contributing to
Ubuntu :)
I just confirmed on my system.
Since the number of transitional packages is fairly small, I think we
should just maintain a hardcoded list in Apport and hide the .deb by
default (with maybe a way to override this?)
Daniel, if you'd like to iterate on this (a debdiff for an ubuntu2
upload), it would be appreciated.
If you don't have the time, say the word, this looks like a simple fix.
...on everything but i386. What's up with that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien-n) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033422
Ti
> 34174 lines in this case is not plausibly reviewable.
I typically use filterdiff to get the packaging changes, and review
specific source files as necessary (including copyright changes in the
diff, which can be important, even if you're just using a script for
it).
Thanks for your help here. I
I very much dislike reviewing packages this way. For a package to be in
the sponsorship queue, it needs to have a debdiff, not a debian.tar.xz.
I understand that it's a new upstream release, but that does not excuse
the need for a debdiff, even if you *also* include these files.
I'm uploading this
1 - 100 of 1001 matches
Mail list logo
