Could you provide journal log from the last boot?
journalctl -b 0 should do the trick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898869
Title:
System slow on
I'm marking this as fix released based on the history of the referenced
pull request.
** Changed in: snapd
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
I'm marking the snapd task as fix released, for 2.45 based on the
history of the referenced pull request.
** Changed in: snapd
Milestone: None => 2.45
** Changed in: snapd
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: snapd
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871148
Title:
services start before apparmor profiles are
I've pushed a tentative fix for this to
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8467
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871148
Title:
services start before
** Changed in: snapd
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: snapd
Assignee: (unassigned) => Zygmunt Krynicki (zyga)
** Changed in: snapd
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: snapd
Milestone: None => 2.44.3
--
You received this bug notification
Seth wrote:
I have to think the better approach may have been to introduce something
like apparmor@.service and configure an apparmor@snapd.service that will
load profiles before snapd is started -- at least if snap is not itself
loading profiles before launching programs.
Note that snapd is
@jibel, can you explain how the mount generator makes local-fs.target
satisfied *before* /var/lib is mounted?
I think this is worth investigating.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
Based on the discussion in this bug report I'm marking this as fix
released.
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Also affects: snapd
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: snapd
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Zygmunt Krynicki (zyga) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Also affects: snapd
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: snapd
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You
I inspected snapd and noticed that we don't invoke "userdel" or
"deluser" in any production code. We have some tests that do use it and
we now support --extrausers there.
I'm inclined to mark the snappy task as fix released, given that we
inherit the relevant tools from core and core18 snaps
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1840375 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840375
Hmm, this feels like a duplicate of 1840375
** Project changed: snappy => snapd
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1840375
groupdel doesn't support extrausers
--
You received this bug
NOTE: I just had a look at snapd code and we still have a reference to
this bug.
// TODO: groupdel doesn't currently support --extrausers, so
// don't try to clean up when it is specified (LP: #1840375)
I'm keeping the snapd task open
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: snapd
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: snapd
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840375
Title:
I'm marking this bug as a property (good or bad is in the eye of the
beholder) of the kernel stack. The snapd project cannot do anything
about it.
** Changed in: apparmor
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: snapd
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification
This has been fixed now. Marking it as such.
** Project changed: snappy => snapd
** Changed in: snapd
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
Hello, there is a difference between the live installer session where
snaps are supported to a limited degree and the persistent image where
they are not supported at all. I'm very sorry for the inconvenience. I
don't know if it is feasible to disable snapd in that context (through
the persistence
** Patch removed: "Debdiff fixing the statx(2) under snap confinement"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1792552/+attachment/5188741/+files/fix-statx-in-snaps.debdiff
** Patch added: "Debdiff fixing the statx(2) under snap confinement (v2)"
Public bug reported:
The statx(2) system call is a relatively new addition and has not seen
widespread use. As such the seccomp filer used by snapd to confine
application processes does not currently permit it. While addressing the
bug in snapd is in progress we wanted to contribute a fix to the
I'm marking this as invalid as it seems to be a bug specific to systemd
packaging, not to snapd per se.
** Changed in: snappy
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in
I can still reproduce this now on my T470 with fully up-to-date bionic
(also tried the
https://launchpad.net/~canonical-x/+archive/ubuntu/x-staging PPA)
kwi 24 18:34:27 t470 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[6195]: (EE)
kwi 24 18:34:27 t470 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[6195]: (EE) Backtrace:
kwi 24 18:34:27
Chatting with Martin it seems that an upload to xenial-updates has
broken the logic since the test in network-manager's postinst script is
now out out date.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in
Possible duplicate https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/+bug/1716034
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676547
Title:
No
This also affected my machines. Thanks to the forum reference I was able
to piece together this:
The file belonging to network-manager /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/10
-globally-managed-devices.conf contains:
[keyfile]
unmanaged-devices=*,except:type:wifi,except:type:wwan
Curiously, at least
Looking at the changelog I see that the new conf.d file is a debian
addition. The relevant changelog says:
* network-manager.postinst: Don't create
/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/10-globally-managed-devices.conf override on
new installations. We don't want NM to manage non-wifi/wwan on
Hey Tyler, thank you for the update, this looks very promising indeed.
I'd like to ask about two aspects:
- detection, how can we detect that this feature is available? Shall
we just compile a program and see if it loads on snapd startup?
- golang, we use golang bindings to libseccomp and we
** Changed in: snapd
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Vogt (mvo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709536
Title:
snapd 2.26.14 on ubuntu-core won't
This is now done in 2.23
** Changed in: snappy
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569581
Title:
snapd no longer
I've installed the updated systemd from tvoss' PPA and I didn't see
anything wrong anymore.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660573
Title:
"system is
I see this even without classic. Curiously my traceback is different:
zyga@dragon-1:~$ lsb_release
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/lsb_release", line 95, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/lsb_release", line 59, in main
distinfo = lsb_release.get_distro_information()
File
I love your design Michał! Let me know if I can help you make this
reality somehow
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyboard in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648435
Title:
5 useless buttons
Is there a bug about is in upstream libseccomp or kernel bugzilla?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567597
Title:
implement 'complain mode' in seccomp
Can we please try to upstream this patch? This will help with making
other distributions share the security features and advantages of snaps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
Guest session is already confined with an apparmor profile. I think that
there's no support for profile transitions there to run snap-confine and
everything else but it might be doable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
** Changed in: snappy
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1520154
Title:
/etc/os-release should contain "codename" (like
** Changed in: plainbox
Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1465549
Title:
Plainbox tests are broken by PEP 440 incompatible
Thanks!
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
ufw uploaded too, thanks!
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
** Patch removed: Fix for ufw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/1465549/+attachment/4415656/+files/ufw_0.34%7Erc-0ubuntu5-0.34%7Erc-0ubuntu6.debdiff
** Patch added: Fix for ufw
** Patch added: Fix for ufw
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/1465549/+attachment/4415656/+files/ufw_0.34%7Erc-0ubuntu5-0.34%7Erc-0ubuntu6.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Patch added: Fix for apturl
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/1465549/+attachment/4415518/+files/apturl_0.5.2ubuntu6-apturl_0.5.2ubuntu7.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
When running unit tests on my vivid VM I've noticed that many tests fail
because there are extra lines printed by pkg_resources:
- /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py:2512: PEP440Warning:
'apturl (0.5.2ubuntu6)' is being parsed as a legacy, non PEP 440,
** Patch added: fix for python-apt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/1465549/+attachment/4415537/+files/python-apt_0.9.3.11build1-0.9.3.11ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Thanks for fixing the apturl package. Do you plan on releasing the fix
back to vivid?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1465549
Title:
Plainbox tests are
** Attachment added: logs from a failed attempt to receive an MMS from/to
Yoigo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ofono/+bug/1371032/+attachment/4229596/+files/network-test-session_10-09-2014_15%3A38%3A35.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I have procured a yoigo SIM and I can now test this
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to messaging-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371032
Title:
Cannot send MMS from Yoigo
Status in
** Changed in: checkbox-gui
Assignee: Zygmunt Krynicki (zkrynicki) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318584
Title:
qt
I don't want to --wipe again but I tried this on both mako and
non-mako. Not sure what else I can do.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael Terry
michael.te...@canonical.com wrote:
Nor on mako. How reproducable is this for folks?
** Changed in: ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu)
47 matches
Mail list logo
