--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:07 EDT---
Fix released, hence closing the bug.
Status: -> CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:17 EDT---
fix verified and released, hence closing the bug.
Staus: => CLOSED.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-16 06:17 EDT---
With the new combination, bedtools testsuite is green and zlib passes all of my
tests too. So it looks good, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-10 07:14 EDT---
Hi, thanks for looking into this. I'll wait until
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1961427 finishes the build and
try it.
In the meantime I've asked the bedtools upstream to cherry-pick the
htslib commit:
Well, that bundled htslib seems to make the situation a bit messy,
So my guess is that this should be fixed in bedtools upstream first...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-06 06:22 EDT---
Here are the originally reported failures:
> But I found in "bedtools":
> bedtools: bgzf.c:351: bgzf_hopen: Assertion
> `compressBound(BGZF_BLOCK_SIZE) < BGZF_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE' failed. test-
> intersect.sh: line 201: 1981 Aborted
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 08:51 EDT---
Good that this was pinged - it seems that we hit a deadlock here :-)
I was waiting on Ubuntu to bump the HTSlib version (or cherry-pick
https://github.com/samtools/htslib/pull/1258), where the incompatibility
issue is resolved. The
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 05:20 EDT---
It seems there is no progress with this issue for a while. What is next? Is the
reason for the incompatibility found meanwhile?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-07 02:38 EDT---
After the announcement support for the official machine name z16 has been added
to binutils. Please consider picking up the following patch from 2.37 branch:
commit e24d2a2d11008aa363366c1087219f3e3405782a
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-15 18:41 EDT---
zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 passes all of my tests on focal, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added:
"debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5569373/+files/debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8_impish.diff
--
You received this bug
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-12-01 10:03 EDT---
The bug was fixed in Focal, Impish and Hirsute. Thanks for everybody
contributing to fix and verify.
IBM Bugzilla status change: -> CLOSED
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2021-11-22 02:30 EDT---
(In reply to comment #10)
> This does not look like an Ubuntu system. Linux kernel has wrong version:
> "Linux 193438490afd 5.8.15-301.fc33.s390x". Are you sure you are testing it
> on Ubuntu image?
I just mechanically
The steps are fine and do not cause a seg. fault on jammy/22.04, impish/21.10
or hirsute/21.04.
But as already assumed it seg. faults on focal/20.04.
(This is not kernel related, a wrong package was
marked as affected, but if it would have been kernel related, we would
have asked to reproduce
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-10-25 05:40 EDT---
Fix landed in impish, hence closing the bug.
IBM BZ status change:->CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-10-25 05:29 EDT---
Fix is part of impish U21.10, hence closing the bug.
IBM BZ status change:->CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-19 06:35 EDT---
Despite the initial concern because of the amount of fixes, Canonical managed
to get this feature (systemd part) into Impish 21.10.
This way, we will have the full functionality of this feature and don't have to
add a release
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-17 06:07 EDT---
This feature (systemd part) will not be integrated in 21.10 (see comment #6
and#7), therefore moving to U22.04.
Canonical will add a release note to reflect changes and limitations due to the
fact, that only the kernel part
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-12 11:39 EDT---
Thanks, everything looks good now!
# time -p env DFLTCC=0 python3 -c 'import gzip;
gzip.decompress(gzip.compress(b"\x00" * 5, 1))'
real 2.56
user 2.23
sys 0.33
# sha1sum zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_s390x.deb
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-11 14:45 EDT---
Oh, sorry, I forgot that you can't use the IBM BZ links. I indeed had the
following diffs in mind:
1.
#ifndef Z_IFUNC_ASM
local
#endif
-unsigned long (*(crc32_z_ifunc(void)))(unsigned long, const unsigned char FAR
*, z_size_t)
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-11 10:36 EDT---
I think it rather has to do with glibc - ifunc are normally called quite early
and therefore cannot use the dynamically resolved symbols, but maybe newer
glibcs tolerate that. Unfortunately I couldn't find more information on this
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-11 06:59 EDT---
zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7~ppa2_s390x.deb works fine, thanks!
# time -p env DFLTCC=0 python3 -c 'import gzip;
gzip.decompress(gzip.compress(b"\x00" * 5, 1))'
real 2.59
user 2.23
sys 0.35
# dpkg -i
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-10 17:47 EDT---
Argh, I haven't noticed this ticket and made a backport on my own a week ago.
I'm attaching my patch here just for reference and will give yours a try
tomorrow.
** Attachment added: "patch"
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-08-10 17:45 EDT---
*** Bug 193835 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-07-28 17:41 EDT---
Sound good for me, lets close it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-07-27
11:37 EDT---
** Attachment added: "udevadm_reload"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5514091/+files/udevadm_reload.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-07-27 11:33 EDT---
Enable udev monitor:
udevadm --debug monitor --property >> udevadm_reload.txt
Steeps followed to retrieve logs:
- Checking actual status of the vLan:
root@ilabg13:~# date
Tue Jul 27 08:23:47 MST 2021
root@ilabg13:~#
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-07-27 10:40 EDT---
Since the file /etc/systemd/network/10-enP53p0s0.link was removed it wasn't get
generated again.
Is there a way to get it generated again?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-07-27 04:23 EDT---
Attachment "Standalone C program from the upstream test case" removed on the
bugzilla side as requested by Canonical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Standalone C program from the upstream test case"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931994/+attachment/5513259/+files/evp_extra_test.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Standalone C program from the upstream test case"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931994/+attachment/5513213/+files/evp_extra_test.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
** Tags removed: architecture-all targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le targetmilestone-inin2110
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935617
** Tags added: architecture-all bugnameltc-193617 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935617
Title:
systemd
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24
11:57 EDT---
** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor nofiles"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506750/+files/udevadm_monitor_nofiles.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24
11:57 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl no files"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506751/+files/journalctl_udev_nofiles.txt.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24 11:53 EDT---
Giving it a try without the /etc/systemd/network/ files
- Checking that it is empty
root@ilabg13:~# ll /etc/systemd/network/
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 24 08:41 ./
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Jun 17 06:18
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23
18:26 EDT---
** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor delay"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506552/+files/udevadm_monitor_delay.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23 18:19 EDT---
Files content:
root@ilabg13:~# cat /etc/systemd/network/10-enP53p0s0.link
[Match]
MACAddress=82:0c:9b:c9:78:f8
[Link]
Name=enP53p0s0
root@ilabg13:~# cat /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link
#
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23
18:25 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl delay"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506551/+files/journalctl_udev_monitor_delay.txt.zip
--
You received this bug notification because
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-17 12:14 EDT---
Right now the system is at kernel version:
root@ilabg13:~# uname -a
Linux ilabg13.tuc.stglabs.ibm.com 5.4.0-73-generic #82-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14
17:29:32 UTC 2021 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
And it is a new version
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-16 07:19 EDT---
FWIW, with Z15 and later we do have a zlib HW accelerator on the chip. So zlib
would also be an option - assuming that z15 will be the most common Z pretty
soon.
>From my checks the HW decompression this was really fast.
How
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-193300 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931725
Title:
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15
11:50 EDT---
** Attachment added: "network"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504857/+files/network.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15
11:49 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl udev monitor"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504856/+files/journalctl_udev_monitor.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15
11:48 EDT---
** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504855/+files/udevadm_monitor.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15 11:18 EDT---
Enable udev monitor:
udevadm --debug monitor --property >> udevadm_monitor.txt
Steeps followed to retrieve logs:
- Manually remove the IP
ip addr del 192.168.171.53/24 dev enP53p0s0.171
- Try to assign ip via netplan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1924794 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924794
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-15 03:49 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by Canonical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-14
11:21 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl udevadm netplan ip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504535/+files/journalctl_udevadm_netplan_ip.txt.zip
--
You received this bug
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-14 11:18 EDT---
Enable udev debug mode:
root@ilabg13:~# cat /etc/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d/override.conf
[Service]
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug
root@ilabg13:~# systemctl daemon-reload && sudo systemctl restart
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-14 08:34 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657
Title:
[Ubuntu 20.4.2] vLan not
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-11 10:04 EDT---
Talked to Viktor - he didn't think there's much indication that the skewed
interface name has any effect. Especially since the interface gets a LL address
assigned just fine.
--
You received this bug notification because
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-10 03:55 EDT---
Makes me wonder if what we're seeing is a side-effect of
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-10 03:58 EDT---
Makes me wonder whether this could be a side-effect of the interface name,
indeed.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-19 07:18 EDT---
IBM Response:
Yes. this makes sense. Previously Canonical reverted the "s390/cio: remove pm
support from ccw bus driver" patch because of the issue. Right solution is to
unrevert the revert-patch and add "s390/cio:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-03 10:12 EDT---
@Canonical, any updates available here? Many thx in adbvance
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2021-04-23 01:50 EDT---
---snip---
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
@@ -1525,8 +1525,7 @@ static int io_subchannel_sch_event(struct subchannel
*sch, int process)
switch (action) {
case IO_SCH_ORPH_UNREG:
case
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 07:23 EDT---
Hi,
I've also run some tests on s390x:
On Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) with libseccomp2 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 and linux
4.15.0.142.129:
In a systemd-nspawn hirsute container:
bash -c "test -x /bin/bash"
returns 1 and strace shows:
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-192463 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2104
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925211
Title:
Hot-unplug of
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-bionic
verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-192453 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2104
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-17 08:12 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status-> closed, workaround available, upstream activitiy by
Canonical.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-01 12:00 EDT---
Works like a charm, thank you xnox!
I tested L2 and L3 HiperSockets during reboot.
L2 got the IP@ via unicast reply
L3 got its IP@ via broadcast reply.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "dhcp_broadcast_qeth_l3.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914740/+attachment/5471482/+files/dhcp_broadcast_qeth_l3.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-01 06:32 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Release with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2021-03-01 02:53 EDT---
This is the setup I use as DHCP client:
root@s83lp72:~# cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.04.2 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-25 10:28 EDT---
(In reply to comment #25)
> For netplan yaml of:
>
> network:
> version: 2
> ethernets:
> enc8f00:
> dhcp4: yes
>
> It would be interesting to see if L3 dhcp starts to work if one does:
>
> $ sudo mkdir -p
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-25 07:36 EDT---
binutils-s390x-linux-gnu s390x 2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.5 works fine.
Tested as follows:
#include
char a __attribute((aligned(1)));
char b __attribute((aligned(1)));
int main() { printf("%p %p\n", , ); }
prints the following:
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-19 03:13 EDT---
Just for the records:
A Firmware fix for the intermittent OSA Firmware issue that I suspected here is
now available for z13 with D27I Bundle S103a.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-18 05:21 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-17 11:51 EDT---
Here is the original complaint:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200611205040.GA1853644@krava/
If you build the kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF, there is a 50%
chance that you will see "Failed verification: in-kernel BTF is
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-15 09:35 EDT---
To me they all look like intermittent problems (timeouts on arm, 404s when
installing packages on Intel). Is it possible to simply retrigger those?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
--- Comment From stefan.schulze.frielingh...@ibm.com 2021-02-05 08:07
EDT---
A quick test has been done by compiling an assembler file which makes use of
vector alignment hints for target z13 (the file was derived from the GCC
testsuite s390/vector/align-1.c). The test was successful
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-29 07:13 EDT---
gzip (1.10-2ubuntu3) works fine, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884514
Title:
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-28 09:27 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released with groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-25 07:11 EDT---
Hello, Ubuntu! Did you have a chance to evaluate the attached 18.04 patch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-22 05:51 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released for all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to elfutils in Ubuntu.
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "binutils_focal_sru.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889742/+attachment/5455305/+files/binutils_focal_sru.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-21 07:35 EDT---
I've enabled groovy-proposed on my system and have seen the problematic
testcase running successfully with:
apt-get --build source elfutils
PASS: run-backtrace-native-biarch.sh
As expected it fails with the old version
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-21 06:06 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-21 04:47 EDT---
Try Installation UBUNTU 18.04.02
add Vlan Interface to additional Qeth device works fine for me
encbd00: mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP
group default qlen 1000
link/ether 02:00:00:13:f0:1b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-01-20 05:23 EDT---
s390x build of gzip 1.10-2ubuntu1.1 fixes the issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901528
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
libdw unwinding fails for 32 bit binaries.
Elfutils biarch test currently fails on s390x doing unwinding for a 32 bit
process.
FAIL: run-backtrace-native-biarch.sh
0x557e7000 0x557eb000
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-07 05:17 EDT---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Could someone try to put the attached script into /etc/kernel/postinst.d and
> let me know whether that make installkernel work? Thanks.
I can confirm this works with installkernel and the
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-23 11:20 EDT---
The attached patch applies cleanly to binutils-2_30 tag and
binutils_2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.4ubuntu1.
** Attachment added: "for 18.04"
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:42 EDT---
Ok, let me see if I can port tests as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903814
Title:
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-18 08:36 EDT---
@xnox, sorry, I didn't quite get your comment - do you need some info about
gzip from us?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-05 05:39 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 07:49 EDT---
Right, but the only relevant line in this file is: "See ./test-suite.log",
which must be a separate file. So I wonder if it's saved somewhere alongside
stdout/stderr?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-11-02 06:05 EDT---
Is test-suite.log saved somewhere?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899621
Title:
[Ubuntu
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-26 08:33 EDT---
We did the zlib part here - but the bugzilla is called "zlib/gzip" - will there
be gzip debs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
When zlib acceleration is enabled, gzip fails when given multiple files
larger than 5KB.
This problem does not happen when running gzip against a single file at
a time. It only happens when you provide multiple files as gzip
arguments.
So this works whether zlib
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-21 07:25 EDT---
zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.2_s390x.deb passes all of my tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 08:53 EDT---
IBM Buzgilla -> closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 08:50 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla closed, Fix Released with all requested distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-20 04:48 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed, Fix Released for all req. distros
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-19 13:57 EDT---
Will 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu4 ultimately go into both 20.04 and 20.10? If yes, then
everything is OK.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-19 11:38 EDT---
zlib1g_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu4_s390x.deb passes all of my tests.
1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.1 though looks old (Thu, 20 Aug 2020) - am I
missing something?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899621/+attachment/5421694/+files/patch
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Package changed: ubuntu => zlib (Ubuntu)
--
You received this
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-13 06:13 EDT---
The released zlib1g:s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu3 s390x passes all my tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-12 06:44 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status-> closed , Fix Released with groovy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-01 05:08 EDT---
This functionallity will only be exploited on z15. On older HW it will be
changed to the software implementation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
1 - 100 of 858 matches
Mail list logo