also other people complained
https://www.reddit.com/r/VFIO/comments/90tg4h/after_loading_vfiopci_instead_of_nvidia_my_dmesg/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
>Kai-Heng Feng (kaihengfeng) wrote on 2019-12-11: #4
> Can you please run `sudo update-initramfs -u -k all` and see if the
issue still happens?
yes this persists even after that.
I have a nvidia card but I want to blacklist it. even blacklisted, the
systemd-udevd /lib/udev/rules.d/71-nvidi
Public bug reported:
this works ok with latest 5.3.x kernel but not with 4.15 kernel
kernel 5.0.0 does not work ok with zfs so I can't confirm it is fixed or not in
5.0.0
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: alsa-base (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-70.79-gen
this is workaround for me that runs correctly:
in rc.local:
(systemctl stop networking.service; systemctl start networking.service;
systemctl restart networking.service; true) &
if i put the commands one by one, rc.local unit will fail because
systemctl start exits non-zero. notice the 'restart'
** Attachment added: "dpkg-l.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1551415/+attachment/4812135/+files/dpkg-l.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
how do I debug this?
if i manually run 'ifup -a --read-environment' or 'systemctl start networking'
it brings all stuff up cleanly.
by 'debug' i mean more than just looking at journalctl -u networking
below contents of network/interfaces, journalctl -u networking and
contents of netwroking unit
workaround for ubuntu 16.04 lts is to install the deprecated ntpdate
that still works ok:
ntpdate:amd64/xenial-security 1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.3 uptodate
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https:/
> the --dry-run removes the packages
no, it doesn't. #1544942 affects only one person, and in comment #64 you
can see that files on /boot are not removed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
and #1544942 does not say dry-run removes packages, but says the output
is different between with and without dry-run (which is something I also
observed but only the first run after the upgrade to latest precise
version of unattended-upgrades)
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'?
also, if you pay attention to my pasted logs, THE FIRST TIME the updated
version is run with -d --dry-run, it DOES mention wanting to remove kernels.
however the second time I run it, without --dry-run, it NO LONGER mentions
removing p
here is another box
oot@wifi:~# eatmydata apt-get install unattended-upgrades
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
bsd-mailx
The following packages will be upgraded:
unattended-upgrades
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to
> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'? It's
'false' by default.
yes,
root@mailhost:~# grep Dependencies /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades
Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true";
root@mailhost:~# ls -lht /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades
-rw-r
worse, before running unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove showed
lots of kernels good for removal. after upgrading and running the new
unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove no longer lists these kernels at
fit for autoremove.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
this bugs says "Precise Fix Released Medium  Brian Murray Edit"
apt-listchanges -a /var/cache/apt/archives/unattended-
upgrades_0.76ubuntu1.2_all.deb says
" unattended-upgrades (0.76ubuntu1.2) precise-proposed; urgency=medium
* cherry pick fix for unused-dependencies removal. (LP: #12670
ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ grep -C2 hostname /usr/share/initramfs-
tools/init
# mdadm needs hostname to be set. This has to be done before the udev rules are
called!
if [ -f "/etc/hostname" ]; then
/bin/hostname -b -F /etc/hostname 2>&1 1>/dev/null
fi
--
You received this bug notifi
Can you file it against initramfs-tools-core please?
the init file comes from that package.
ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ dpkg -S /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init
initramfs-tools-core: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ zcat /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-4-generic | cpio -i
192905 blocks
ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ grep -n -C2 hostname init64-
65-
66:# mdadm needs hostname to be set. This has to be done before the udev rules
are called!
67:if [ -f "/etc/hostname" ]; then
68:/bin
** Attachment added: "hostname.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1545297/+attachment/4574658/+files/hostname.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
18 matches
Mail list logo