[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-02-01 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage Assignee: Andrius KL (andrewdaman) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails due to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-01-15 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: islam elalani (i.s.l.a.m) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2021-01-04 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage Assignee: jason mercer (jasdace) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails due to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-12-10 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Fix Released => Triaged ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-11-30 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage Assignee: enes (ekko52) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: enes (ekko52) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: enes (ekko52) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: enes (ekko52) =>

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1902898] Re: power-button action inconsistent between user session and greeter

2020-11-10 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:45 AM Sebastien Bacher <1902...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > is it important enough to justify doing the SRU work? >From my myopic (server-oriented) point-of-view, changing the default in 20.04 to prompt is a good idea. I've found that users often install Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1902898] [NEW] power-button action inconsistent between user session and greeter

2020-11-04 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: When a user is logged in to the Ubuntu desktop, a power button event will cause the user to be prompted to choose if they'd like to proceed with a shutdown. However, if the system is sitting at a greeter screen, a power button event will instead attempt a suspend w/o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846557] Re: Unable to debug any kernel on i386 qemu machine

2020-10-29 Thread dann frazier
Ignore my last comment - I took another look and it appears to be generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846557 Title: Unable to debug any kernel on i386

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846557] Re: Unable to debug any kernel on i386 qemu machine

2020-10-29 Thread dann frazier
The fix for bug #1848200 was ARM specific. This is about x86, so it's a different issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846557 Title: Unable to debug any

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848200] Re: gdb not stopping on breakpoint in a 32-bit program

2020-10-29 Thread dann frazier
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846557 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846557 @James: In theory it should be, but that code is from 2 different branches - and you may well be seeing a different issue. Please report a new bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1881947] [NEW] Assertion 'r >= 0' failed at src/journal/test-journal-flush.c:52, function main(). Aborting.

2020-06-03 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: Observed in an focal/arm64 autopkgtest failure of systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.1: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/arm64/s/systemd/20200603_071743_738b2@/log.gz [...] PASS: test-journal-enum ==

[Touch-packages] [Bug 682445] Re: configure_networking doesn't wait for udev to populate available nics

2020-06-03 Thread dann frazier
This was fixed long ago. initramfs-tools (0.100) unstable; urgency=low Release "singing in the snow ☃☃☃" [...] [ Alkis Georgopoulos ] * [b938c7e] configure_networking() wait for udev to populate available nics (LP: #682445) [...] -- Michael Prokop Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:42:23 +0100

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1856407] Re: nvidia-435 is in eoan, linux-restricted-modules only builds against 430, ubiquity gives me the self-signed modules experience instead of using the Canonical-signed m

2020-04-15 Thread dann frazier
The ubuntu-drivers-common task here appears to be to change it to prefer the pre-built/signed drivers (linux-modules-nvidia-*) over the DKMS counterparts. I'd recommend at that point that we start seeding linux- modules-nvidia-[0-9]+-generic onto the desktop ISO instead of the DKMS counterparts,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1868310] Re: configure_networking fails if dhcp provides no domain search path

2020-03-20 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868310 Title: configure_networking fails

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1868310] [NEW] configure_networking fails if dhcp provides no domain search path

2020-03-20 Thread dann frazier
does not provide a domain search path, which is triggering this. If I move my VM to a network w/ a DHCP server that *does* provide this search path, it continues fine. ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: dann frazier (dannf) Status: In Progress -- Y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] Re: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2020-02-11 Thread dann frazier
The test this fixed passed in the automated tests, so marking eoan and bionic verified (other tests failed, but those are unrelated). ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862378] [NEW] libsystemd-shared broken in Multi-Arch

2020-02-07 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: I noticed that systemd-machined was failing to start on an arm64 box. This box had armhf enabled, and turns out systemd had been cross-graded over to systemd:armhf[*]. It still had systemd-container:arm64 installed, so now I had an arm64 /lib/systemd/systemd-machine, but an

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776654] Re: systemd upstream sysusers tests fails

2020-01-28 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776654 Title: systemd upstream sysusers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776654] Re: systemd upstream sysusers tests fails

2020-01-27 Thread dann frazier
ystemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notific

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776654] Re: systemd upstream sysusers tests fails

2020-01-27 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: Expired ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: Expired ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Eoan)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776654] Re: systemd upstream sysusers tests fails

2020-01-27 Thread dann frazier
Notice in the log in comment #6 that the unexpected error we are seeing for "unhappy-2" is the expected error for "unhappy-1". I wonder if there's a race here: # tests for error conditions for f in unhappy-*.input; do echo "*** Running test $f" rm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776654] Re: systemd upstream sysusers tests fails

2020-01-27 Thread dann frazier
Another instance: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/s390x/s/systemd/20200127_181441_fb524@/log.gz ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859226] Re: crash reports Illegal instruction w/ newer binutils

2020-01-11 Thread dann frazier
in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: crash (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: crash (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dan

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859226] Re: crash reports Illegal instruction w/ newer binutils

2020-01-10 Thread dann frazier
This appears to fix it for me: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils- gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=8cd0e5e93145699736a370b271ff03f3f41670b0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859226] Re: crash reports Illegal instruction w/ newer binutils

2020-01-10 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: crash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859226 Title: crash reports Illegal

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1859226] [NEW] crash reports Illegal instruction w/ newer binutils

2020-01-10 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: crash 7.2.6-1ubuntu1 now fails on arm64 w/ an Illegal instruction: $ sudo crash -st /usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-$(uname -r) /proc/kcore Illegal instruction The previous version of crash was 7.2.6-1build1. While there are no differences in the source code (just an

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] Re: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2019-11-20 Thread dann frazier
The autopkgtests for bionic and disco also continue to fail w/ the upload in -proposed. However, as was the case for eoan, the failure that the uploads for this bug targeted has gone away. The remaining failures appear to be a regression(s) introduced by previous security uploads. I've reported

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853383] [NEW] autopkgtest regression in test_add_proc_info

2019-11-20 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: The security uploads for apport (2.20.11-0ubuntu8.2 for eoan, 2.20.10-0ubuntu27.2 for disco, and 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.8 for bionic - and maybe those for older releases as well) have caused the test_add_proc_info test to start failing[1]. The pattern changed after the subsequent

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] Re: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2019-11-20 Thread dann frazier
While the autopkgtest for eoan still fails, it now fails with 2 errors instead of 3. I confirmed from the logs[*] that the no-longer-failing test is the one this upload addressed. [*] Compare the "2019-11-14 11:09:47 UTC" vs. "2019-11-19 19:32:01 UTC" logs at:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] Re: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2019-11-11 Thread dann frazier
** No longer affects: apport (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851542 Title: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU Status in apport package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] Re: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2019-11-11 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Bionic)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] Re: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2019-11-06 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851542 Title: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] Re: autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2019-11-06 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] A new autopkgtest test regression began appearing after (and due to) an aspell SRU. + + == + FAIL: test_install_packages_versioned (__main__.T) + install_packages() with versions and with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848200] autopkgtest failure investigation

2019-11-06 Thread dann frazier
Stable Release Team, I investigated the autopkgtest regression in Comment #12, and believe it to not be a regression introduced by this gdb upload. apport has been updated a couple of times via security since tests passed - and at least one of those updates had known regressions. There is also a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851542] [NEW] autopkgtest fails due to aspell SRU

2019-11-06 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: [Impact] A new autopkgtest test regression began appearing after (and due to) an aspell SRU. [Test Case] ## From within autopkgtest source package, with autopkgtest deps installed ## This is a slightly modified version if debian/tests/upstream-system # do not run in the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848200] Re: gdb not stopping on breakpoint in a 32-bit program

2019-10-22 Thread dann frazier
Unreproducible w/ >= disco versions, so marking them Invalid. ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848200] Re: gdb not stopping on breakpoint in a 32-bit program

2019-10-22 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] - After upgrading gdb from 8.1-0ubuntu3 to 8.1-0ubuntu3.1, gdb does not stop - on breakpoint when running a 32-bit application (on 64-bit Ubuntu). + After upgrading gdb from 8.1-0ubuntu3 to 8.1-0ubuntu3.1, gdb does not stop + on breakpoint when running a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848200] Re: gdb not stopping on breakpoint in a 32-bit program

2019-10-21 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: - After upgrading gdb from 8.1-0ubuntu3 to 8.1-0ubuntu3.1, gdb does not - stop on breakpoint when running a 32-bit application (on 64-bit Ubuntu). + [Impact] + After upgrading gdb from 8.1-0ubuntu3 to 8.1-0ubuntu3.1, gdb does not stop + on breakpoint when running a 32-bit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848200] Re: gdb not stopping on breakpoint in a 32-bit program

2019-10-18 Thread dann frazier
I have a test fix building here, could one of you verify it? https://launchpad.net/~dannf/+archive/ubuntu/lp1848200 ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848200] Re: gdb not stopping on breakpoint in a 32-bit program

2019-10-18 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: gdb (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: gdb (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gdb (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gdb (Ubuntu Disco)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842284] Re: initramfs does not copy ehci-platform

2019-09-18 Thread dann frazier
Maybe it is only on ARM? dannf@xps13:/tmp$ dpkg -c linux-modules-4.15.0-64-generic_4.15.0-64.73~16.04.1_arm64.deb | grep ehci-platform -rw-r--r-- root/root 17238 2019-09-13 06:10 ./lib/modules/4.15.0-64-generic/kernel/drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.ko ** Changed in: initramfs-tools

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842284] Re: initramfs does not copy ehci-platform

2019-09-03 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842284] Re: initramfs does not copy ehci-platform

2019-09-03 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: In Progress ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1804478] Re: netplan dhcp interface with no default route causes systemd-networkd-wait-online to hang

2019-04-08 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1816767] [NEW] purge does not remove whoopsie-id

2019-02-20 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: whoopsie 0.2.63 $ sudo apt remove --purge whoopsie Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: whoopsie* 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783138] Re: hinic interfaces aren't getting predictable names

2018-08-28 Thread dann frazier
Verification: ubuntu@d06-3:~$ cat /proc/version Linux version 4.15.0-34-generic (buildd@bos02-arm64-002) (gcc version 7.3.0 (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.3.0-16ubuntu3)) #37-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 27 15:22:18 UTC 2018 ubuntu@d06-3:~$ lsmod | grep hinic hinic 94208 0 ubuntu@d06-3:~$ grep eth

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783138] Re: hinic interfaces aren't getting predictable names

2018-08-28 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] Interfaces associated with Huawei "hinic" PCI adapters will not be assigned predictable names[*] and instead remain using the kernel names (e.g. eth0). This can lead to races where the interface names are not the same on every boot. For example, in a system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783138] Re: hinic interfaces aren't getting predictable names

2018-07-31 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: - On a HiSilicon D06 system we noticed that interfaces provided by a plug- - in "HINIC" network card are not getting assigned predictable names. - We're getting "ethX" names instead of the expected "enPblah" names. + [Impact] + Interfaces associated with Huawei "hinic" PCI

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783138] Re: hinic interfaces aren't getting predictable names

2018-07-23 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783138] Re: hinic interfaces aren't getting predictable names

2018-07-23 Thread dann frazier
fyi, this appears to fix the problem for me. ** Patch added: "0001-hinic-Link-the-logical-network-device-to-the-pci-dev.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1783138/+attachment/5166848/+files/0001-hinic-Link-the-logical-network-device-to-the-pci-dev.patch ** Also

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1783138] [NEW] hinic interfaces aren't getting predictable names

2018-07-23 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: On a HiSilicon D06 system we noticed that interfaces provided by a plug- in "HINIC" network card are not getting assigned predictable names. We're getting "ethX" names instead of the expected "enPblah" names. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1782835] Re: d-i step "Configure the keyboard" fails

2018-07-20 Thread dann frazier
I rebuilt bionic d-i against proposed and the problem is now gone. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1779815] Re: [Ubuntu 18.04.01][BostonLC][mpt3sas] installer does not detect any LSI based SAS/md raid device

2018-07-20 Thread dann frazier
I prepared a ppa build of d-i (ppa:dannf/test) and booted w/ apt- setup/proposed=true. It resolves the issue I was seeing on a HiSilicon D05 system w/ disks attached to an mpt3sas controller. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1700826] Re: please include numactl on the ubuntu-server iso

2018-06-27 Thread dann frazier
Yeah - I verified it on the arm64 ISOs, and it was good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700826 Title: please include numactl on the ubuntu-server iso

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1722313] Re: [SRU][xenial] Add "--with-audit" config option so that the hwclock command creates an audit record when the hardware clock is altered.

2017-10-10 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Artful) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1714431] Re: Can not login after switch to runlevel 3 from 1

2017-09-01 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1700826] Re: please include numactl on the ubuntu-server iso

2017-07-31 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686784] Re: no predictable names for platform (non-PCI) NICs

2017-07-19 Thread dann frazier
Verified w/ 229-4ubuntu19. I rebuilt d-i against this update and verified that the enahisi style names were used at boot. I also upgraded a system with 229-4ubuntu18 to 229-4ubuntu19 where the non-PCI platform NIC is my primary NIC. After reboot, everything came back up as expected. ** Tags

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1700826] Re: please include numactl on the ubuntu-server iso

2017-07-12 Thread dann frazier
The MIR has been approved, so please go ahead and add numactl to the server seed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1700826 Title: please include numactl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686784] Re: no predictable names for platform (non-PCI) NICs

2017-07-11 Thread dann frazier
I upgraded systemd to 229-4ubuntu18 and removed /etc/udev/rules.d/70 -persistent-net.rules, and found that my onboard NICs are now using predictable names: ubuntu@d05-2:~$ ls /sys/class/net/ enahisic2i0 enahisic2i3 enP2p233s0f0 enP2p233s0f3 lo enahisic2i1 enP10p17s0f0 enP2p233s0f1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1700826] [NEW] please include numactl on the ubuntu-server iso

2017-06-27 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: I've submitted an MIR for the numactl binary package at: LP: #1700824. Assuming that is approved, please also include this on the server seed, which I believe is necessary for it to appear on the ubuntu-server ISOs. ** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686784] Re: no predictable names for platform (non-PCI) NICs

2017-06-15 Thread dann frazier
I also tested this on a Qualcomm QDF2400 server, and the onboard platform device was renamed to "enaqcom8070i0". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1686784

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686784] Re: no predictable names for platform (non-PCI) NICs

2017-06-13 Thread dann frazier
I built a d-i image against zesty-proposed, and verified that the installer showed predictable names for the onboard interfaces on a HiSilicon D05 server (see enahisi* in the attached screenshot). I used one of these interfaces for the install, and the system retained the configuration upon

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1691991] Re: Xorg Segmentation fault on Hisilicon D05 board (arm64)

2017-06-01 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Zhanglei Mao wrote: > Daniel, > > It is really good. For patch driver and new kernel buiding, I cc Dann on the > mail too, he is our engineer for this enablement project with Hisilicon. > This is pearl kernel was build by him too. > >

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1674258] Re: lscpu crashs when /dev/mem is not stable to read

2017-05-16 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686784] [NEW] no predictable names for platform (non-PCI) NICs

2017-04-27 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: [Impact] Systems may have NICs attached to the "platform" bus. These are NICs that are onboard, but not attached to a PCI(-like) bus. Rather, they are described by firmware directly. None of the naming policies enabled by Ubuntu by default matches these NICs, so they end

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1649213] Re: Support rootfs on xhci-plat-hcd attached storage

2017-01-05 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Brian Murray wrote: > Is the Trusty task valid? I don't see an upload in its SRU queue. It is - I think Ike maybe waiting for the current trusty-proposed version to migrate before rebasing. -dann -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649213] Re: Support rootfs on xhci-plat-hcd attached storage

2016-12-15 Thread dann frazier
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Zesty) ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649213] Re: Support rootfs on xhci-plat-hcd attached storage

2016-12-12 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1643474] Re: sysrq k(kill) always kill the Xorg under Desktop

2016-11-21 Thread dann frazier
** Package changed: procps (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643474 Title: sysrq k(kill) always kill the Xorg under Desktop

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1643084] Re: [REGRESSION] kill segfaults w/ single, negative PID

2016-11-21 Thread dann frazier
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643084 Title: [REGRESSION] kill segfaults w/ single,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1577297] Re: echo | xargs kill -15 kills running window session

2016-11-18 Thread dann frazier
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1637026 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637026 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1637026 kill incorrectly parses negative PIDs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1643084] [NEW] [REGRESSION] kill segfaults w/ single, negative PID

2016-11-18 Thread dann frazier
LP: #1637026. [Test Case] $ /bin/kill -9 Segmentation fault (core dumped) [Regression Risk] This fix will now make our optparsing almost identical to current yakkety, for which I see no obvious regressions filed. ** Affects: procps (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: dann frazier (da

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1643084] Re: [REGRESSION] kill segfaults w/ single, negative PID

2016-11-18 Thread dann frazier
Addresses: https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/ca3851bccaed9924746cc8551188f9039c162093 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643084 Title: [REGRESSION] kill

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637300] Re: procps upgrades fail in a LXD container

2016-11-04 Thread dann frazier
root@procpstest:~# apt install procps -y Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: procps 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 46 not upgraded. Need to get 208 kB of archives. After this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637026] Re: kill incorrectly parses negative PIDs

2016-11-04 Thread dann frazier
root@procpstest:~# strace -f -o /tmp/strace.out su dannf -c '/bin/kill -12' root@procpstest:~# grep kill /tmp/strace.out 2623 execve("/bin/su", ["su", "dannf", "-c", "/bin/kill -12"], [/* 11 vars */]) = 0 2628 execve("/bin/bash", ["bash", "-c", "/bin/kill -12"], [/* 17 vars */]) = 0 2628

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637300] Re: procps upgrades fail in a LXD container

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #827423 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827423 ** Also affects: procps (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827423 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637026] Re: kill incorrectly parses negative PIDs

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637026 Title: kill incorrectly parses negative PIDs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637300] Re: procps upgrades fail in a LXD container

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
Note that, though procps itself is patched to ignore errors when writing to /proc/sys, the problem here is that the initscript causes the systemd-sysctl service to get triggered, and that does not fail gracefully: ubuntu@procps:~$ sudo /lib/systemd/systemd-sysctl Couldn't write '1' to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637300] Re: procps upgrades fail in a LXD container

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
** Patch added: "proposed debdiff for xenial" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1637300/+attachment/4768378/+files/procps-no-init-on-upgrade.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637300] [NEW] procps upgrades fail in a LXD container

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
nce: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: procps (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: High Assignee: dann frazier (dannf) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: procps (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1610499] Re: hadoop crash: /bin/kill in ubuntu16.04 has bug in killing process group

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1637026 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637026 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1637026 kill incorrectly parses negative PIDs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1178140] Re: top reports 9999% process CPU utilization

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 531310 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531310 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 531310 Top showing % CPU usage -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637026] Re: kill incorrectly parses negative PIDs

2016-10-27 Thread dann frazier
I've verified the fix for this issue, but it appears to have exposed a bug with updating procps in an LXD container. Below I'll show the verification, followed by the update issue. root@procps:~# apt-cache policy procps | grep Installed Installed: 2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2 root@procps:~# strace -f -o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637026] [NEW] kill incorrectly parses negative PIDs

2016-10-26 Thread dann frazier
** Affects: procps (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: High Assignee: dann frazier (dannf) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: procps (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: pro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1608948] Re: support hw watchpoints/breakpoints on ARMv8.{1, 2}

2016-08-02 Thread dann frazier
** Patch added: "armv8.1,2-hw-watch,breakpoints.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/1608948/+attachment/4712374/+files/armv8.1%2C2-hw-watch%2Cbreakpoints.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1603137] Re: libbfd changed name without transition

2016-07-14 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594452] Re: Add vulcan support

2016-07-01 Thread dann frazier
gcc-5 5.4.0-5ubuntu1~16.04 from ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/ppa does accept vulcan as an -mcpu option, and it does pass the correct -march settings down to the assembler: $ gcc -v hello.c -o hello 2>&1 | grep ' as ' as -v -EL -mabi=lp64 -o /tmp/ccgyMnhl.o /tmp/cchw8EFH.s $ gcc -mcpu=vulcan -v hello.c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594452] Re: Add vulcan support

2016-06-21 Thread dann frazier
GCC support is upstream now; backport attached. ** Changed in: gcc-6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: gcc-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Patch added: "gcc-6-vulcan-support.patch"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594452] Re: Add vulcan support

2016-06-21 Thread dann frazier
** Project changed: gcc => gcc-6 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594452 Title: Add vulcan support Status in binutils package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594452] [NEW] Add vulcan support

2016-06-20 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: Vulcan support has recently landed upstream. Please include this backport in Ubuntu. ** Affects: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Confirmed ** Tags: arm64 ** Attachment added: "binutils-vulcan-support.patch"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1588946] Re: Support root on ehci-msm attached storage

2016-06-06 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1588020] Re: package linux-image-4.4.0-22-generic 4.4.0-22.40 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2016-06-06 Thread dann frazier
You appear to have run out of disk space: gzip: stdout: No space left on device Can you free up some space and retry? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1588946] Re: Support root on ehci-msm attached storage

2016-06-03 Thread dann frazier
** Summary changed: - Support booting from ehci-msm attached storage + Support root on ehci-msm attached storage -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1588946] Re: Support booting from ehci-msm attached storage

2016-06-03 Thread dann frazier
ned) => Manoj Iyer (manjo) ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1588946] [NEW] Support booting from ehci-msm attached storage

2016-06-03 Thread dann frazier
and reboot. Booting will fail because it will be unable to find the root file system. [Regression Risk] This driver is only available on ARM platforms, minimizing the impact to all other architectures. ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: dann frazier (dannf

[Touch-packages] [Bug 427775] Re: ntpdate.dhcp always ignored

2016-05-05 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: ntp (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427775 Title: ntpdate.dhcp always ignored

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1574832] Re: iptraf-ng display issue

2016-04-25 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #819928 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819928 ** Also affects: iptraf-ng (Debian) via

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1546714] Re: System not booting when /home is on separate LUKS-encrypted partition

2016-04-08 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546714 Title: System not booting when /home

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1542080] Re: Needs tar/xattr support to build docker

2016-03-23 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Chris J Arges <1542...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Are you wanting gccgo-4.9 4.9.3-0ubuntu5 rejected from the trusty queue? Yes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gccgo-4.9 in

  1   2   >