[Touch-packages] [Bug 739469] Re: Dash search unavoidably returns offensive results
** Description changed: unity 3.6.6-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Natty unity 3.6.8-0ubuntu3, Ubuntu Natty unity-2d 5.8.0-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Pangolin + unity 7.2.2+14.04.20140714-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu 14.04 Example 1: 0. Be a 14-year-old girl, or a schoolteacher preparing to show a film to your class, or a businessperson preparing to give a presentation. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type movie to launch Movie Player. What happens: Seven applications appear, one of which is called PornView. Example 2: 0. Be a Dell representative or customer. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type Dell to find the Dell Recovery tool. What happens: Five applications appear, including Dopewars, a drug-dealing game. (More examples in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/883800/comments/15.) This problem cannot reasonably be solved merely by renaming or blacklisting one or two particular applications. These are just two examples, and if the Dash shows any applications that aren't installed, there is no bright line between those that should appear for everyone and those that should appear for no-one. We can't realistically expect the entire Ubuntu software library to be offense-free: as more independent applications are published, some (especially games) will be targeted at mature audiences and/or be non- worksafe, and that's fine. (We can introduce a maturity rating system inside Ubuntu Software Center for those.) But people should be able to expect that the launcher in Ubuntu's shell, of all things, *will* be offense-free. Possible solutions: * Simplest would be to restrict application search results only to those applications that are actually installed. As Mark Shuttleworth said in https://lists.launchpad.net/unity-design/msg08030.html: To launch what you know you have installed, use the Dash. To explore what may be installed, or may be available, use the Software Centre. Now, neither piece may yet be ideal, but we should improve the design of those pieces for their specific purposes, not try to make everything do everything. * Introduce a maturity ratings system https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-software- maturity-ratings, apply it to every package in the Ubuntu archive that needs it, then set a reasonable default for Dash searches (analogous to Google's SafeSearch Moderate). This might involve adding a setting for how much filtering the Dash should do. * Ad-hoc and unconfigurable blacklisting (as proposed in duplicate bug 883800). This might result in ongoing disagreements about whether particular applications should be blacklisted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739469 Title: Dash search unavoidably returns offensive results Status in Unity: Fix Released Status in Unity Foundations: Fix Released Status in Unity Applications Lens: Confirmed Status in “unity” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “unity-place-applications” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: unity 3.6.6-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Natty unity 3.6.8-0ubuntu3, Ubuntu Natty unity-2d 5.8.0-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Pangolin unity 7.2.2+14.04.20140714-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu 14.04 Example 1: 0. Be a 14-year-old girl, or a schoolteacher preparing to show a film to your class, or a businessperson preparing to give a presentation. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type movie to launch Movie Player. What happens: Seven applications appear, one of which is called PornView. Example 2: 0. Be a Dell representative or customer. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type Dell to find the Dell Recovery tool. What happens: Five applications appear, including Dopewars, a drug-dealing game. (More examples in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/883800/comments/15.) This problem cannot reasonably be solved merely by renaming or blacklisting one or two particular applications. These are just two examples, and if the Dash shows any applications that aren't installed, there is no bright line between those that should appear for everyone and those that should appear for no-one. We can't realistically expect the entire Ubuntu software library to be offense-free: as more independent applications are published, some (especially games) will be targeted at mature audiences and/or be non- worksafe, and that's fine. (We can introduce a maturity rating system inside Ubuntu Software Center for those.) But people should be able to expect that the launcher in Ubuntu's shell, of all things, *will* be offense-free. Possible solutions: * Simplest would be to restrict application search results only to those applications that are actually installed. As Mark Shuttleworth said in
[Touch-packages] [Bug 739469] Re: Dash search unavoidably returns offensive results
In Ubuntu 14.04, example 2 produces the results originally described. Example 1 no longer displays PornView, but instead shows QFlatBoob, QBoobmsg, and QHandJoob. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739469 Title: Dash search unavoidably returns offensive results Status in Unity: Fix Released Status in Unity Foundations: Fix Released Status in Unity Applications Lens: Confirmed Status in “unity” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “unity-place-applications” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: unity 3.6.6-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Natty unity 3.6.8-0ubuntu3, Ubuntu Natty unity-2d 5.8.0-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Pangolin unity 7.2.2+14.04.20140714-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu 14.04 Example 1: 0. Be a 14-year-old girl, or a schoolteacher preparing to show a film to your class, or a businessperson preparing to give a presentation. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type movie to launch Movie Player. What happens: Seven applications appear, one of which is called PornView. Example 2: 0. Be a Dell representative or customer. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type Dell to find the Dell Recovery tool. What happens: Five applications appear, including Dopewars, a drug-dealing game. (More examples in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/883800/comments/15.) This problem cannot reasonably be solved merely by renaming or blacklisting one or two particular applications. These are just two examples, and if the Dash shows any applications that aren't installed, there is no bright line between those that should appear for everyone and those that should appear for no-one. We can't realistically expect the entire Ubuntu software library to be offense-free: as more independent applications are published, some (especially games) will be targeted at mature audiences and/or be non- worksafe, and that's fine. (We can introduce a maturity rating system inside Ubuntu Software Center for those.) But people should be able to expect that the launcher in Ubuntu's shell, of all things, *will* be offense-free. Possible solutions: * Simplest would be to restrict application search results only to those applications that are actually installed. As Mark Shuttleworth said in https://lists.launchpad.net/unity-design/msg08030.html: To launch what you know you have installed, use the Dash. To explore what may be installed, or may be available, use the Software Centre. Now, neither piece may yet be ideal, but we should improve the design of those pieces for their specific purposes, not try to make everything do everything. * Introduce a maturity ratings system https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-software- maturity-ratings, apply it to every package in the Ubuntu archive that needs it, then set a reasonable default for Dash searches (analogous to Google's SafeSearch Moderate). This might involve adding a setting for how much filtering the Dash should do. * Ad-hoc and unconfigurable blacklisting (as proposed in duplicate bug 883800). This might result in ongoing disagreements about whether particular applications should be blacklisted. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/739469/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 739469] Re: Dash search unavoidably returns offensive results
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739469 Title: Dash search unavoidably returns offensive results Status in Unity: Fix Released Status in Unity Foundations: Fix Released Status in Unity Applications Lens: Confirmed Status in “unity” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “unity-place-applications” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: unity 3.6.6-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Natty unity 3.6.8-0ubuntu3, Ubuntu Natty unity-2d 5.8.0-0ubuntu1, Ubuntu Pangolin Example 1: 0. Be a 14-year-old girl, or a schoolteacher preparing to show a film to your class, or a businessperson preparing to give a presentation. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type movie to launch Movie Player. What happens: Seven applications appear, one of which is called PornView. Example 2: 0. Be a Dell representative or customer. 1. Click the Applications button. 2. Type Dell to find the Dell Recovery tool. What happens: Five applications appear, including Dopewars, a drug-dealing game. (More examples in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/883800/comments/15.) This problem cannot reasonably be solved merely by renaming or blacklisting one or two particular applications. These are just two examples, and if the Dash shows any applications that aren't installed, there is no bright line between those that should appear for everyone and those that should appear for no-one. We can't realistically expect the entire Ubuntu software library to be offense-free: as more independent applications are published, some (especially games) will be targeted at mature audiences and/or be non- worksafe, and that's fine. (We can introduce a maturity rating system inside Ubuntu Software Center for those.) But people should be able to expect that the launcher in Ubuntu's shell, of all things, *will* be offense-free. Possible solutions: * Simplest would be to restrict application search results only to those applications that are actually installed. As Mark Shuttleworth said in https://lists.launchpad.net/unity-design/msg08030.html: To launch what you know you have installed, use the Dash. To explore what may be installed, or may be available, use the Software Centre. Now, neither piece may yet be ideal, but we should improve the design of those pieces for their specific purposes, not try to make everything do everything. * Introduce a maturity ratings system https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-software- maturity-ratings, apply it to every package in the Ubuntu archive that needs it, then set a reasonable default for Dash searches (analogous to Google's SafeSearch Moderate). This might involve adding a setting for how much filtering the Dash should do. * Ad-hoc and unconfigurable blacklisting (as proposed in duplicate bug 883800). This might result in ongoing disagreements about whether particular applications should be blacklisted. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/739469/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
