[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2020-04-24 Thread Richard Anderson
* It is also there is a setting here that I overlooked. should have been: It is possible also there is a setting here that I overlooked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2020-04-24 Thread Richard Anderson
This may or may not be an issue, but here are my observations. The order of operations seems to be the cause of my issue with the additional factor that the /boot partition size is unusually small compared to recent Ubuntu installations. Order of operations as follows: 1. unattended-install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2020-04-21 Thread Richard Anderson
Is this still an issue? I have Xenial installs where this occurs occasionally. I don't have much information other than /boot partition fills where we will get alerts. After logging in and running apt-get autoremove the space is cleared. apt-mark showauto 'linux-image-.*' Show 3 kernels, which I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-04 Thread Jarno Suni
However, if I do not run unattended-upgrades with --dry-run before running without it, automatic removing of unneeded packages works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-04 Thread Jarno Suni
Mikko Pesari, oh the packages are not actually removed in Wily, either. I was fooled by the output of the unattended-upgrades command. costinel, you were right about --dry-run not removing the packages. I corrected my bug report (bug #1544942). -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-04 Thread Jarno Suni
costinel, In bug #1544942 I run with --dry-run two times and do not compare outputs between with --dry-run and without it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-04 Thread Jarno Suni
As for bug #1544942, It is reported on Wily, which has newer version of unattended upgrades, so it may behave differently. I think command /usr/bin/dpkg --status-fd 9 --force-depends --force-remove-essential --remove linux-headers-4.2.0-16-generic:amd64 linux-headers-4.2.0-16:all

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-04 Thread Mikko Pesari
Happens on Trusty and Xenial too. There are a few bug reports about it marking kernels as manually installed. They may be related. Here's a test case anyway: Normal run: # apt-get install lolcat # apt-mark showmanual lolcat lolcat # apt-mark auto lolcat lolcat set to automatically installed. #

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-04 Thread Mikko Pesari
I tested on Precise. When running with --dry-run, unattended-upgrade marks the autoremovable packages as manually installed. This prevents them from being removed when running without --dry-run afterwards. Check "apt-mark showmanual". -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
> the --dry-run removes the packages no, it doesn't. #1544942 affects only one person, and in comment #64 you can see that files on /boot are not removed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
and #1544942 does not say dry-run removes packages, but says the output is different between with and without dry-run (which is something I also observed but only the first run after the upgrade to latest precise version of unattended-upgrades) -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread Jarno Suni
costinel, the --dry-run removes the packages, see Bug #1544942. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'? also, if you pay attention to my pasted logs, THE FIRST TIME the updated version is run with -d --dry-run, it DOES mention wanting to remove kernels. however the second time I run it, without --dry-run, it NO LONGER mentions removing

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
here is another box oot@wifi:~# eatmydata apt-get install unattended-upgrades Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: bsd-mailx The following packages will be upgraded: unattended-upgrades 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'? It's 'false' by default. yes, root@mailhost:~# grep Dependencies /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"; root@mailhost:~# ls -lht /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread Alexander Skiba
@costinel: have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'? It's 'false' by default. For the record, this is what it looks like with a completely fresh vagrant VM for Ubuntu Precise. vagrant@vagrant-ubuntu-precise-64:~$ sudo unattended-upgrade --debug Initial blacklisted packages:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
worse, before running unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove showed lots of kernels good for removal. after upgrading and running the new unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove no longer lists these kernels at fit for autoremove. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
this bugs says "Precise Fix Released Medium  Brian Murray Edit" apt-listchanges -a /var/cache/apt/archives/unattended- upgrades_0.76ubuntu1.2_all.deb says " unattended-upgrades (0.76ubuntu1.2) precise-proposed; urgency=medium * cherry pick fix for unused-dependencies removal. (LP:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-02-09 Thread Jarno Suni
Peter Grandi, doesn't unattended-updgrades' automatic removal of new unused dependencies take into account file "/etc/apt/apt.conf.d /01autoremove-kernels"? `apt-get autoremove` does. BTW. I think /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal should be run during boot to ensure that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-02-08 Thread Alexander Skiba
@sean-boran, comment #57: The fix is available in the trusty-updates repository. See this changelog: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/u /unattended-upgrades/unattended-upgrades_0.82.1ubuntu2.4/changelog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-02-08 Thread SeanBoran
Hi, I regularly have systems with /boot full due, I believe, to this issue and had an example this morning. Manually running "apt-get autoremove" deleted kernels+headers for the last 10 kernels or so. How can that be automated? Above one refers to version .76ubuntu1.2, and I have

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-01-29 Thread Guy Baconniere
# This will simulate the removal of useless packages linked to old kernels dpkg --get-selections 'linux-*.*.*-*' | grep $'\t''install' | cut -f1 \ | grep -vF "$(uname -r | cut -d- -f1,2)" \ | grep -vF "$(dpkg --get-selections 'linux-*image*' \ | grep -E '^[^0-9]+'$'\t''install$' | cut -f1 | xargs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-01-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package unattended-upgrades - 0.76ubuntu1.2 --- unattended-upgrades (0.76ubuntu1.2) precise-proposed; urgency=medium * cherry pick fix for unused-dependencies removal. (LP: #1267059) -- Brian Murray Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:06:00 -0800 **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-22 Thread Peter Grandi
Note that this long story started from kernel upgrades, and so far nobody has made an important point... When you install a new kernel package, you may want to remove all previous versions indeed, *except* the one that is currently running. Because if you remove the package for the currently

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-18 Thread Felix Barbeira
I tested the version 0.76ubuntu1.2 on a couple of precise VMs and it works fine on both of them: root@:~# apt-get autoremove -s Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: linux-image-3.2.0-64-generic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-18 Thread Felix Barbeira
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-17 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Nils, or anyone else affected, Accepted unattended-upgrades into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /unattended-upgrades/0.76ubuntu1.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-15 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-11 Thread Brian Murray
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package unattended-upgrades - 0.82.1ubuntu2.4 --- unattended-upgrades (0.82.1ubuntu2.4) trusty-proposed; urgency=medium * cherry pick fix for unused-dependencies removal (LP: #1267059) -- Michael Vogt Thu, 03 Dec 2015 17:02:17

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-10 Thread Steve Brorens
Could someone with the permissions to do so *please* "Nominate this for series" - tagging it as also applying to 12.04? - as per my comment #45. I would, but appear not to have sufficient permission. (Oddly the "Nominate this for series" option only shows while I'm logged out). -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-07 Thread Christopher Heuer
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-07 Thread Christopher Heuer
unattended-upgrades updated openssl this morning on two machines that I set to use trusty-proposed, and old kernels were removed properly. Changing status back and edited tag per comment #46. ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-06 Thread Steve Brorens
It's just removed a kernel corrctly, so I've tagged as "confirmed" ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-06 Thread Steve Brorens
I'm sure that it's possible to "tag" this as also applying to Precise (12.04) - but it's not clear to me how to do that. Could someone do so, or point me to instructions? Thx -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-06 Thread Shane Synan
@Steve Brorens: It's actually the little "Tags" section under the bug description and right before the comments that needs edited. Remove 'verification-needed' and add 'verification-done', and that should be it! If you can, you may want to change "Confirmed" back to "Fix Committed" - that's for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-03 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: "debdiff with the fix for trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+attachment/4529110/+files/unattended-upgrades_0.82.1ubuntu2.4.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-03 Thread Michael Vogt
I pushed a fix to trusty-proposed, please double check the git diff was a bit unclean. As much testing as possible is appreicated (work for me). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-03 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Nils, or anyone else affected, Accepted unattended-upgrades into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source /unattended-upgrades/0.82.1ubuntu2.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-02 Thread Steve Brorens
It does indeed also apply to Precise (12.04 LTS ), I have clients with a number of these having regular problems with this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-01 Thread Nils Toedtmann
Nice to see that a LTS-killing bug is taken seriously (after 2 years). What about Precise? It is affected and has still 1.5y to live. (Though one might argue that any affected Precise machine must be either dead or manually patched by now) -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-11-30 Thread Alexander Skiba
Short version: backports won't work. Slightly longer version: It's not in trusty-backports, it's not in vivid-(updates|backports), it is however in wily. (Yes, I am aware that it's not an LTS and therefore not ideal, I have the same situation at work.) Information retrieved on 2015-11-30. --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-11-30 Thread Steve Brorens
Just chipping in to say that it's very frustrating to see this marked with a status of "Fix released". Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what that implies, but: - all my servers running 14.04 LTS don't have the fix yet - and apparently won't get it unless I take action - if I'm reading the above

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-11-30 Thread Brian Murray
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-11-16 Thread Seth Arnold
mvo, is this suitable for an SRU? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-11-15 Thread Jon Ribbens
Is there any news on this being added as a security update to trusty? I'm beginning to wonder what "LTS" means if a bug that results in every installation of Ubuntu sooner or later ceasing to receive security updates does not get pushed out as part of the security updates. (As someone else

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-11-14 Thread Samuel Reed
This is causing us issues left and right. Has the backport come through yet? We are still seeing servers fill up disks because of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-11-14 Thread Mikko Pesari
For what it's worth; I've worked around this by installing the version from wily on some trusty machines. So far so good. The machines upgrade daily and old kernels and their headers are removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-07-27 Thread Nick Peelman
Would like to second that this get backported to Trusty and other supported versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-07-23 Thread Alexander List
Did you even consider providing the fix via SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-07-23 Thread Alexander List
So, there is a fix released, but it is still not in backports for trusty... how does that help affected users? Please backport the fix to all currently supported versions of Ubuntu, and propose it for SRU. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-06-19 Thread Michael Vogt
This is fixed, I plan to do a backport for 14.04 and 12.04 via the trusty-backports, precise-backports mechanism. ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-05-26 Thread Guy Baconniere
I agree with @Jamiejellicoe this ticket should be rated as Security issue (250) but we are close that (236)... Having /boot full can lead to kernel, inird image or grub.conf corruption and on top of that it's blocking new security updates to be applied. When /boot is full you cannot even purge

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-05-12 Thread Alexander Skiba
In regard to #20: I've submitted a pull request that *changes the default behavior* of `Remove-Unused-Dependencies` to remove *all* orphaned packages, here: https://github.com/mvo5/unattended-upgrades/pull/6/files (1 week as of this comment) I've not received any feedback on this yet, though -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-05-12 Thread Ingolf Becker
For some reason the unattended upgrades script is very picky about which packages are to be removed. It tries to auto-remove only those packages that have been made redundant by the current set of updates. However, installing a new kernel does not make any previous kernel version redundant

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-05-12 Thread Ingolf Becker
#20: Thanks for the github link. #21: You are right, for some reason I thought that autoclean does autoremove. You are not quite correct though: If you upgrade a package, the list of dependencies may have changed and dependency may have been dropped. This will then be no longer required, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-05-12 Thread Lars Heide
As there has been confusion about this apparently: Marking the packages for upgrade line 1194: mark_upgrade() is not the same as upgrading them. The upgrade only happens after the changes are commited: line 392: res = cache.commit(install_progress=iprogress) The output of is_auto_removable

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-05-12 Thread Lars Heide
APT::Periodic::AutocleanInterval is kinda documented in /etc/cron.daily/apt # APT::Periodic::AutocleanInterval 0; # - Do apt-get autoclean every n-days (0=disable) From what I read from the code, it does just that. According to the man page autoclean clears out the local repository of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-05-12 Thread Ingolf Becker
Thanks for the link - I didn't realise the code was based on github. I don't think changing the default behaviour is the solution though - for a proper auto-remove there is already a variable `APT::Periodic::AutocleanInterval` in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10periodic (from the update-notifier-common

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-04-09 Thread Alexander Skiba
I've patched the packages for Precise, Trusty and Debian Wheezy. Although it's been done in a very ugly and quite sloppy way I can provide the patches. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-04-09 Thread Jamie
P.s. How is this bug not classed as a security risk? When /boot is full no more security updates can be installed (when the owner of the machine is lead to believe they are still being installed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-04-09 Thread Nils Toedtmann
Each day this bug breaks more Ubuntu servers that do unattended- upgrades, in particular cloud servers with 100GB rootfs. I alone have a few dozens affected machines. And it's not totally trivial for Admin Average to diagnose the inode shortage, realize it's flooded with linux-headers packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-04-09 Thread Jamie
This is ridiculous, why has this not been fixed yet? I manage around 100 VM's and this problem is causing me serious headaches. I simply haven't got time to go round manually autoremoving old kernals and it would be foolish not to leave unattended security updates on. Just because there are only

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-03-24 Thread JohnWashington
@Nathaniel: does http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/fixing-a-bug.html help? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-03-24 Thread Nathaniel W. Turner
This bug is serious (it causes filesystems to fill up on pretty much every production server that doesn't have a huge root fs). It has a reasonable looking patch that fixes the problem. I don't think there is anything to discuss other than: How do we get the fix into Ubuntu? -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-03-23 Thread Apreche
I can confirm what Nils Toedtmann says. I discovered this bug precisely because I encountered situation #1089195. This is a serious issue for any production servers as you want them to get automatic security updates, but running out of inodes will simply bring them down. I don't know why this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-03-23 Thread JohnWashington
Apreche: you say it's a serious issue, and I agree with you. Allegedly, if I look at the stats at the top of the page, this affects me and 34 other users. Though I'm betting that's just the tip of the iceberg. Informal discussions reveal that bugs need to have thousands indicating it affects

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-03-09 Thread Nils Toedtmann
Note that situation #1089195 is another possible outcome of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-01-19 Thread Chris Case
This is a pretty big issue, as installing Ubuntu server with the defaults will always create a boot partition, and enabling automatic updates (which is desirable from a security standpoint) means that every few weeks kernel updates start failing because the old kernels haven't been removed. I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2015-01-15 Thread the2nd
same problem here. ubuntu 12.04. is there any fix for this available? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267059 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2014-09-29 Thread urusha
Lars Heide, your patch works great for me, I think it should be applied upstream. But some people may find differential behavior (now_auto_removable-pkgs_auto_removable) safer. Then the right solution may be: implementing logic described in #7 (in addition to patch from #4) with adding new config

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2014-09-18 Thread Lars Heide
Actually I just saw that it is semi fixed in 14.04 in the way that now_auto_removable-pkgs_auto_removable now reads now_auto_removable - pkgs_auto_removable which is also wrong, as now_auto_removable = set([pkg.name for pkg in cache if pkg.is_auto_removable])

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2014-09-18 Thread Lars Heide
I checked and apparently now_auto_removable and pkgs_auto_removable are always the same, as is_auto_removable only returns different results _after_ the packages have actually been upgraded. Just marking them does apparently not change the output of is_auto_removable(). I tried to use the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2014-09-17 Thread Lars Heide
This thing seems to be broken in 2 ways (on 12.04 at least): A) Its checking internally for the wrong variable ( now_auto_removable-pkgs_auto_removable instead of now_auto_removable-pkgs) : Do this and it will actually tell you the packages that are to be removed. B) It does not actually

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2014-09-17 Thread Lars Heide
** Patch added: correct variable and issue commit https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1267059/+attachment/4206463/+files/unattended-upgrade.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2014-09-17 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment correct variable and issue commit seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the patch flag from the attachment, remove the patch tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team. [This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies does not work

2014-09-17 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: trusty ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo) ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- You received this