[Touch-packages] [Bug 1477350] Re: Rgression building sbsigntool with binutils >= 2.22-6ubuntu1.2 in precise

2016-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.22-6ubuntu1.4 --- binutils (2.22-6ubuntu1.4) precise-security; urgency=medium * debian/patches/binutils-bz17512-misc.patch: fix segfault in objcopy on i386 to compensate for missing commit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1477350] Re: Rgression building sbsigntool with binutils >= 2.22-6ubuntu1.2 in precise

2016-06-02 Thread Steve Beattie
I've pushed a version of binutils that in local testing fixes the segfault in objcopy on pecoff binaries, addressing the sbsigntool FTBFS, to the ubuntu-security-proposed ppa https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu- security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages . If people could test these to confirm and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1477350] Re: Rgression building sbsigntool with binutils >= 2.22-6ubuntu1.2 in precise

2016-06-02 Thread Steve Beattie
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre identified that the segfault is result of the patch binutils-bz17512-misc.patch (aka https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=32a9d621c3c480aa093a089a36e36c35f68a4010 ). I've dug deeper into this and the issue is that stack gets corrupted in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1477350] Re: Rgression building sbsigntool with binutils >= 2.22-6ubuntu1.2 in precise

2016-05-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.