This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.24-5ubuntu14.2
---
binutils (2.24-5ubuntu14.2) trusty; urgency=medium
* 002-dont-segv-on-initial-instructions-overflow.patch:
Fix ld crash on arm64 (LP: #1644363)
-- Julian Andres Klode Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:02:10
+0200
** Change
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Fix Released
** No longer affects: eglibc (Ubuntu Trusty)
** No longer affects: eglibc (Ubuntu)
As we can see in
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/4.3-7ubuntu1.6/+build/11220608,
the bash package built successfully with this new binutils:
Get:51 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ trusty-proposed/main binutils
arm64 2.24-5ubuntu14.2 [1050 kB]
thus marking as verification-done.
** Tag
A note to whoever releases this: it was built in the security-proposed
PPA so it can be released to both updates *and* security, to fix a
regression in the security pocket.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binut
Hello Adam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted binutils into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.24-5ubuntu14.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644363
Title:
[trusty/arm64] binutils segf
https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/commit/?id=4210c49357b216705a85734293023d8d5683bb49
mentions iterative_hash() crashes in ld and the fix for that being
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-
gdb.git;a=commit;h=99d190fac4d2aab238cfc798dc5c28ab41456882 in ld.
--
You received this bug no
I applied the patch and uploaded it to
https://launchpad.net/~juliank/+archive/ubuntu/lp1644363+1422795/+packages
to build. I'll upload bash there once that's done to see if it helps.
** Description changed:
On arm64, the bash gettext configure test causes binutils to segv:
configure:8453:
2.19-0ubuntu6.8 doesn't show it either
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644363
Title:
[trusty/arm64] binutils segfaults on bash gettext configure test
Statu
downgrading eglibc to 2.19-0ubuntu6.6 doesn't show the segfault
** Also affects: eglibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/ld --build-id --as-needed -Bstatic -dynamic-linker
/lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 -X -z relro
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/crt1.o
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/crti.o
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.24-5ubuntu14.1
is a no change rebuild of 2.24-5ubuntu14, moving the binutils update from the
updates pocket to the security pocket. Successful test rebuild results for
bash using binutils 2.24-5ubuntu14 can be found at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu
Note that only the static build sees this segv, the non-static build
works fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644363
Title:
[trusty/arm64] binutils seg
A failed build tree with config.log (successful in build-bash, failed in
build-static) can be found by people with rugby access at
rugby:~adconrad/bash-4.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
ht
Also, this didn't happen in the release pocket, so it's a regression in
an SRU of binutils (or gcc feeding it garbage, possibly).
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notif
ii binutils 2.24-5ubuntu14.1
arm64GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
ii gcc-4.8 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3
arm64GNU C compiler
ii libc6:arm64 2.
16 matches
Mail list logo