[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649097] Re: 'linux' source package signature is not valid

2016-12-12 Thread Vyacheslav
Reality check: that means that all source packages received via 'apt-get source' are not trusted by Ubuntu clean installation ? Is there a safe way to get full public key (not short unsafe keyid) for a source package then? Thanks ** Summary changed: - 'linux' source package signature is not va

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649097] Re: 'linux' source package signature is not valid

2016-12-12 Thread Seth Arnold
Julian, do you have any ideas how this could be handled better? I'm short on ideas here. The gpgv output seems useful but it's also potentially misleading. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649097] Re: 'linux' source package signature is not valid

2016-12-12 Thread Seth Arnold
Thanks for the bug report. This isn't as dire as it looks: APT's security model is based on signed InRelease files that have sha256sums of all archive contents. In this case, the InRelease file will have a sha256sum for one of the Sources files, and that file will have a sha256sum for the linux s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649097] Re: 'linux' source package signature is not valid

2016-12-12 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security ** Package changed: ubuntu => apt (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649097 Title: