[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-07-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package coreutils - 8.25-2ubuntu3~16.04 --- coreutils (8.25-2ubuntu3~16.04) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium * SRU: LP: #1667407. Add -fno-schedule-insns to CFLAGS for sha256.o on ppc64el to fix performance regression. -- Matthias Klose

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-06-28 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
@doko I already added the verification-done-xenial tag so I guess that's all that's needed to do, right? ** Tags removed: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-06-27 Thread Matthias Klose
** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667407 Title: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-06-26 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
Tested on xenial (16.04). Test input of 465MB took 4.5s (version 8.25-2ubuntu3~16.04) instead of 15.1s (version 8.25-2ubuntu2). Thanks ** Tags removed: removal-candidate ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-06-26 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
Is that all? Please point out if I missed something. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667407 Title: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-27 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for testing Yakkety. I can release 8.25-2ubuntu3~16.10 to yakkety-updates. 8.25-2ubuntu3~16.04 still needs testing from xenial- updates though. ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package coreutils - 8.25-2ubuntu3~16.10 --- coreutils (8.25-2ubuntu3~16.10) yakkety-proposed; urgency=medium * SRU: LP: #1667407. Add -fno-schedule-insns to CFLAGS for sha256.o on ppc64el to fix performance regression. -- Matthias Klose

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-09 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
Hi, is there anything else I can do in order to have the 8.25-2ubuntu3 on yakkety? (not on proposed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667407 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-03 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
just to give an idea, to verify the sha256 of ubuntu-16.10-server- ppc64el.iso: 8.25-2ubuntu2 : 0m15.204s 8.25-2ubuntu3~16.10: 0m4.952s great! ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-03 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
Fix verified on coreutils_8.25-2ubuntu3~16.10_ppc64el.deb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667407 Title: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-02 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Gustavo, or anyone else affected, Accepted coreutils into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/8.25-2ubuntu3~16.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-02 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
> -Original Message- > From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of > Lukasz Zemczak > Sent: quinta-feira, 2 de março de 2017 10:31 > To: Gustavo Serra Scalet > Subject: [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on >

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-02 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
** Description changed: - Dear Maintainer, + [Impact] + * Performance drop of 2x-3x on ppc64le when using sha256sum + + * Please backport this bug to last LTS as this application is widely + used. + + * This fix is due to a optimization issue found on gcc v4.9 to gcc + v7.0. + + [Test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-03-02 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Could we get the bug details updated to follow the SRU template? Also, checking the SRU upload, one thing I don't particularly like is that the attached patch has no description. Yes, the change is self- explanatory, but some context in patch descriptions is always welcome. Won't block on that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-02-28 Thread Matthias Klose
fixed in zesty with 8.26-3ubuntu1 ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667407 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-02-28 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: coreutils (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: coreutils (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-02-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: coreutils (Debian) Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667407 Title: improve 2x-3x sha256sum

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-02-24 Thread Gustavo Serra Scalet
One other possibility (as performed by Fedora) is to have libcrypto (from openssl) configured through the "--with-openssl=yes" parameter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667407] Re: improve 2x-3x sha256sum performance on ppc64le due to current gcc optimization bug

2017-02-24 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: yakkety ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #854053 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854053 ** Also affects: coreutils (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854053 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: