Drat. I do think this should still be pushed. I don't know when I'll
have time to do it though. Please keep it open.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
I'll still aim to push this for trusty and xenial.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers running on
This was removed from Xenial-Proposed as well.
It is still in Y-proposed but that is EOL.
Given the time that has passed and the rather unclear state I'd consider this
bug incomplete.
In comment #29 Serge outlined that for Trusty all of that not really applies
(everyone is using backports
Hello Cam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cgroup-lite into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-
lite/1.11ubuntu0.16.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Sorry, this got lost in my inbox. I used dput. I seemed to recall that
in some recent cycle the it became either ok or preferred to use
$release-updates instead of $release-proposed in SRUs. I can trivially
change it ack to yakkety-proposed if preferred.
For Trusty, I just noticed that the
My script can't see the Yakkety upload because it's in unapproved in the
updates pocket, not the proposed pocket. I've never seen that before.
How did you upload it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors as I don't see any debdiffs or similar
here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs
I see tasks for Trusty and Yakkety but they aren't in the queue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs inside
Ah. I see cgroup-lite in the backports queue for Trusty. Was this
intentional?
For Yakkety, I do see it in the queue manually. Probably a bug in my
script. I'll investigate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Hello Cam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cgroup-lite into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-
lite/1.1.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Thanks for looking. I'll push that tonight.
Original Message
From: Cam Cope
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 3:50 PM
To: serge.hal...@gmail.com
Reply To: Bug 1668724
Subject: [Bug 1668724] Re: fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers running on
16.04
LGTM
--
You received this bug
This bug was fixed in the package cgroup-lite - 1.13
---
cgroup-lite (1.13) zesty; urgency=medium
* Handle mounting comounted cgroup controllers (LP: #1668724)
-- Cameron Cope Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:48:05 -0800
** Changed in: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu)
Status:
(s@/tmp/2@/proc/cgroups@ of course)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers running on 16.04
Status
FWIW something like:
for d in `tail -n +2 /tmp/2 | awk '{
if ($2 == 0)
print $1
else if (a[$2])
a[$2] = a[$2]","$1
else
a[$2]=$1
};END{
for(i in a) {
print a[i]
}
}'`; do
mkdir -p
There is a bug (which is fixed in newer versions) in lxc in that it does
not ignore cgroups which are not used by the container. So in your
particular case, if you're not using the co-mounted controllers, then
indeed fixing the lxc bug should work for you as well.
Nevertheless some people will
I'm happy to provide a patch, but if the root cause of my issue is in lxc
it may be easier to patch that than worrying about backwards compatibility
for cgroups on older distro releases.
On Mar 3, 2017 20:11, "Serge Hallyn" <1668...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> This bug incidentally also affects
This bug incidentally also affects the cgroupfs-mount package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
fails to mount cgroupfs inside containers
(Note - this means the patch I just pushed to zesty is in fact wrong.
Since zesty requires systemd this doesn't really matter, but we must get
a working patch before pushing SRU patches)
@ccope, please let me know if you care to write an update patch.
--
You received this bug notification
Hm, yes i see (hierarchy 0). I do worry that means that systems with
the unified hierarchy will be still more of a problem, since it is
mounted as hierarchy 0. But then it's probably fine to just say that
cgroup-lite doesn't support unified hierarchy.
--
You received this bug notification
Hm, I found a bug in my last version of this patch. Freshly booted machines
which had not mounted the cgroupfs had all the hierarchies as 0, causing all
cgroups to get mounted onto a single directory. I can work around this by
detecting this scenario.
However, I wonder if I am actually seeing a
** Also affects: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects:
I assume /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd was used because that's where systemd
expected to see it. I can't find any version which mounts it at
/sys/fs/cgroup/name=systemd - do you have a version that does that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Edit: re: the systemd hierarchy, it's actually not mentioned in
/proc/cgroups, it's /proc/self/cgroups
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668724
Title:
Also, is there a reason the name=systemd cgroup controller gets mounted
at /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd instead of /sys/fs/cgroup/name=systemd in
newer versions of cgroups-mount? It means my applications have to
special-case stripping off the name= when they try to work with cgroups
based upon
Whoops, didn't notice I changed that part in my local copy. Should have
been more careful with my patch.
** Patch removed: "cgroup-lite_1.1.5.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/1668724/+attachment/4828546/+files/cgroup-lite_1.1.5.patch
** Patch removed:
Patch for 1.12
** Patch added: "cgroup-lite_1.12.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/1668724/+attachment/4828590/+files/cgroup-lite_1.12.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Patch for 1.1.5
** Patch added: "cgroup-lite_1.1.5.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/1668724/+attachment/4828588/+files/cgroup-lite_1.1.5.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
The attachment "cgroup-lite_1.1.5.patch" seems to be a debdiff. The
ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they
can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag,
Thanks for the patches. Note that you've changed the loop variable from
d to c, but the loop is still using d, so nothing gets mounted with that
patch verbatim. Switching the variable back to d fixes the issue for
me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
It looks like there were fixes in the latest version of cgroup-lite that
would still be applicable/useful for earlier ubuntu releases, but I
tried to minimize the diffs to have the functionality that I need. Let
me know if you need a patch for trusty as well.
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: cgroup-lite (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cgroup-lite in Ubuntu.
Patch for 1.12
** Patch added: "cgroup-lite_1.12.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/1668724/+attachment/4828547/+files/cgroup-lite_1.12.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Patch for cgroup-lite 1.1.5
** Patch added: "cgroup-lite_1.1.5.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgroup-lite/+bug/1668724/+attachment/4828546/+files/cgroup-lite_1.1.5.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
33 matches
Mail list logo