The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1686361

Title:
  systemd does not respect nofile ulimit when running in container

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in systemd source package in Yakkety:
  New
Status in systemd source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Containers cannot use maximum RLIMIT_NOFILE, because systemd sets
  an arbitrary cap.

  [Test Case]

   * Start container with high RLIMIT_NOFILE (e.g. 100 000)
   * Check that RLIMIT_NOFILE on the container is more than 65536

  [Regression Potential]

   * This is a feature / change of behaviour. Some users may be relying
  on the lower RLIMIT_NOFILE cap, but it should not have a negative
  impact on the host (as in creating too many file descriptors/denial of
  service).

  [Original Bug Report]

  When systemd currently starts in a container that has RLIMIT_NOFILE set to 
e.g.
  100000 systemd will lower it to 65536 since this value is hard-coded into 
systemd.
  I've pushed a patch to systemd upstream that will try to set
  the nofile limit to the allowed kernel maximum. If this fails, it will compute
  the minimum of the current set value (the limit that is set on the container)
  and the maximum value as soft limit and the currently set maximum value as the
  maximum value. This way it retains the limit set on the container.
  It would be great if we could backport this patch to have system adhere to
  nofile limits set for the container. This is especially important since user
  namespaces will allow you to lower the limit but not raise it back up 
afterwards.
  The upstream patch is appended.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1686361/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to