You have been subscribed to a public bug: I'm mounting folders from my NAS on my computer (Ubuntu 18.04) with cifs. Copying an 8 GB file...
Upload (local -> mounted) - Nautilus/Nemo -> 6 MB/s - rsync -> 50-60 MB/s Download performance is also strange, but not my biggest concern. Download (mounted -> local) - Nautilus/Nemo -> 90 MB/s - rsync -> 50-60 MB/s rsync command (upload): rsync --progress /home/me/file.iso /mnt/cifs_media/ fstab entry: //nas/media /mnt/cifs_media cifs vers=3.0,uid=me,gid=me,credentials=/home/me/.smbcredentials,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700 0 0 Any idea, why Nautilus is uploading up to 10 times more slowly than rsync, although both using the same cifs, os, hardware, network etc.? PS: Further info for bug report 1) The release of Ubuntu: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS 2) The version of the package: Nautilus 3.26.3 3) What you expected to happen: At least same speed as with using rsync 4) What happened instead: See above ** Affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Status: New ** Tags: bionic -- cifs - poor upload speed with nautilus compared to rsync https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp