[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2019-01-14 Thread Iain Lane
Fix Released for dnsmasq (because of the revert), but we should still keep an eye on the upstream thread. ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2019-01-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager - 1.12.6-0ubuntu3 --- network-manager (1.12.6-0ubuntu3) disco; urgency=medium * debian/tests/nm.py: Make assert_iface_down() not check the interface's state. We call nmclient.deactivate_connection() to terminate connections t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2019-01-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805857 Title: network-manager dep8 failure bl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2019-01-07 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Tags removed: rls-dd-incoming ** Tags added: disco -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805857 Title: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq pro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2019-01-07 Thread Iain Lane
I did some more poking this morning and followed up to the thread. A change in 2.80 has made this start happening. I'm hoping that someone upstream will understand what's going on enough to propose a fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packag

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2018-12-20 Thread Iain Lane
After looking for a while, I think that the error we were managing to reproduce (LOWERLAYERDOWN) was probably a red herring, and we were reproducing some other (valid) bug. The original cause of the testsuite failure still exists. Not entirely sure why but this only reproduces for me 'properly' wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2018-12-19 Thread Sebastien Bacher
IRC comment from upstream on #nm in case it's useful 'not that `nmcli device disconnect $DEV` and `nmcli connection down $PROFILE` do not set the interface down (like `ip link set $IF down`). Instead, the ~logically~ disconnect the interface, which essentially means that `nmcli device` reports tha

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2018-12-04 Thread Will Cooke
** Also affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Disco) Assignee: (unassigned) => Iain Lane (laney) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subsc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2018-11-29 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks Robie! ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: rls-dd-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805857] Re: network-manager dep8 failure blocks dnsmasq proposed migration

2018-11-29 Thread Robie Basak
I've done some investigation and my best educated guess right now is that there race somewhere, most like in the n-m dep8 tests but possibly in n-m, which is being triggered by an unrelated timing change in the newer dnsmasq and is causing some unwanted result that results in the dep8 test teardown