(specifically published RFCs defining the relevant digest-algo /
signature types format to be used in x.509 certificates / or any pki
generically. Just the definition of the math to calculate the digest is
not enough)
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Opinion
--
You
I don't think it follows.
For example, with an RSA key I can use SHA3-512.
Signature Algorithm: RSA-SHA3-512
The point is, that digests are not independant, and one cannot just use
any as they need to have well known identifiers as specified in the
relevant RFCs.
Ie.
> did you try to use sha3-512 and did that work?
please see the initial report:
> or 'default_md = sha3-512'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1810129
Title:
Not sure if blake support is in TLS certificates.
I see many more constants for sha3, than for blake:
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/gjzTwVTCBX/
did you try to use sha3-512 and did that work?
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification
4 matches
Mail list logo
