[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-12-17 Thread Matt Zilmer
This bug persists. It may be a regression associated with 5.0.0.37. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814262 Title: Wired interface gets impossibly high

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-07 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package procps - 2:3.3.15-2ubuntu2 --- procps (2:3.3.15-2ubuntu2) disco; urgency=medium * 10-network-security.conf: change the rp_filter default from 1 to 2, the strict mode isn't compatible with the n-m handling of captive portals (lp: #1814262)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Package changed: network-manager (Ubuntu) => procps (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks for the investigation work, I emailed the Ubuntu devel list about changing the default, let's see how the discussion goes https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-February/040588.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-07 Thread Rachel Greenham
Follow up comment on the upstream bug pointed to a commit where it suggests the rp_filter default should actually now be 2 rather than 1: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/230450d4e4f1f5fc9fa4295ed9185eea5b6ea16e Think at this point I need to just let you guys talk amongst yourself. :-)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-07 Thread Rachel Greenham
Reporting back on this: The opinion there seems to be that the problem is down to the sys net.ipv4.conf.*.rp_filter values being set to 1 instead of defaulting to 0. This is done in the procps package, and I'm guessing is the way it is as a protection against IP spoofing. kernel doc page I was

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-04 Thread Rachel Greenham
As it recurred again today and showed no signs of correcting itself like it did on Friday, I went ahead and reported it upstream, here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/issues/116 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
k, it could also be a bug in the new 1.15 serie with is new/still unstable so not likely used anywhere in 'production' and having little users at the moment -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-01 Thread Rachel Greenham
Noted. I see there's no report of anything similar already, and if it was the sort of problem it looked like to me, people would be screaming blue murder about it, so I think I'll wait and see if it recurs or becomes an ongoing problem, rather than a one-off. Maybe my LAN was having a bad hair

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814262] Re: Wired interface gets impossibly high metric 20100

2019-02-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report. Is there any chance that you could also report the issue upstream on https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager? We do keep up with updates for that component but don't know the code as well that they do and there might have a better idea of what's