** Changed in: binutils
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843479
Title:
gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in Exec format
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.33-2ubuntu1.2
---
binutils (2.33-2ubuntu1.2) eoan; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for the -security pocket
binutils (2.33-2ubuntu1.1) eoan; urgency=medium
* Cherry-pick from binutils master branch:
PR25237, set no file contents
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Verified binutils 2.33-2ubuntu1.2 by rebuilding gzip in the Bileto PPA
with new binutils and checking the rebuilt gzip binary:
root@ee-dwz:~# wget
https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3878/+build/18334107/+files/gzip_1.10-0ubuntu3.1_amd64.deb
--2019-12-20 17:50:02--
Hello Hayden, or anyone else affected,
Accepted binutils into eoan-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.33-2ubuntu1.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Description changed:
IMPORTANT: Binutils was accidentally built in -proposed instead of in a
PPA. I'm rebuilding it in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
- service/+archive/ubuntu/3876 for the -security pocket.
+ service/+archive/ubuntu/3877 for the -security pocket.
[Impact]
So the binutils upload will need to be re-built against security and
pushed to the -security pocket additionally to the -updates pocket,
otherwise all the future potential gzip security updates would revert
this fix here. Balint is preparing the rebuild, but I think ubuntu-
security should be
This bug was fixed in the package gzip - 1.10-0ubuntu3.1
---
gzip (1.10-0ubuntu3.1) eoan; urgency=high
* Rebuild with binutils 2.33-2ubuntu1.1 (LP: #1843479)
- Build-depend on binutils (>= 2.33-2ubuntu1.1)
-- Balint Reczey Fri, 13 Dec 2019 16:41:46 +0100
** Changed in:
(actually, I don't think security needs to be notified, so scratch that)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843479
Title:
gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in
** Description changed:
+ IMPORTANT: Binutils was accidentally built in -proposed instead of in a
+ PPA. I'm rebuilding it in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
+ service/+archive/ubuntu/3876 for the -security pocket.
+
[Impact]
- * Running gzip on WSL1 results in the following error:
-
Verified gzip 1.10-0ubuntu3.1 rebuilt with binutils (2.33-2ubuntu1.1):
root@ee-motd-verify:~# dpkg -l gzip
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
This bug was fixed in the package gzip - 1.10-0ubuntu4
---
gzip (1.10-0ubuntu4) focal; urgency=high
* Rebuild with binutils 2.33.1-6ubuntu1 (LP: #1843479)
- Build-depend on binutils (>= 2.33.1-6ubuntu1)
* Pass -fstack-protector to mingw build to fix FTBFS
-- Balint Reczey
Hello Hayden, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gzip into eoan-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gzip/1.10-0ubuntu3.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.33.1-6ubuntu1
---
binutils (2.33.1-6ubuntu1) focal; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian; remaining changes:
- Build from upstream sources.
- Don't generate control file entries for any native mips* packages.
* Cherry-pick from
Hello Hayden, or anyone else affected,
Accepted binutils into eoan-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.33-2ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * Running gzip on WSL1 results in the following error:
+$ gzip
+-bash: /bin/gzip: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
+ * The error occurs frequently in package updates and makes gzip inoperable
on WSL1
+ * The problem is caused by
I've forwarded the binutils patch to the mailing list, too:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-12/msg00104.html .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
The offset pointing past EOF is observed only in gzip and in several
debug files:
$ grep -v dbg wrong-offsets
gzip_1.10-0ubuntu3_amd64.deb: /bin/gzip
libhugetlbfs-tests_2.21-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb:
/usr/lib/libhugetlbfs/tests/obj64/xB.linkhuge
libhugetlbfs-tests_2.21-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb:
** Changed in: binutils
Status: Won't Fix => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843479
Title:
gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in Exec format
** Changed in: binutils
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843479
Title:
gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in Exec format error on
Launchpad has imported 1 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #25237
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
** Also affects: binutils via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are
While this is a bug in WSL's ELF loader I located to problem in
binutil's strip and after the fix passed my testing I'll send it
upstream and also SRU it to Eoan to let us rebuild affected packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey (rbalint)
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => In
Thanks Hayden, closing
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843479
Title:
gzip in Ubuntu Eoan
This was determined to be a bug in the WSL1 ELF loader and fix is
inbound from the WSL side.
https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4461#issuecomment-536023805
Please close on Ubuntu.
** Bug watch added: github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues #4461
https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4461
--
>From the WSL issues page:
> Now, thing is, all of the new binaries (f.e. /bin/ls) have that
.plt.sec section also, and they work just fine. Also compiling a hello.c
with -fcf-protection works. Because of course it does. The only other
new section in there (Disco gzip has 27 sections, Eoan has
I tried comparing the binaries with diffoscope, and one difference which
jumped out at me is the .plt.sec section which is present in the Eoan
binary. This presumably comes from CET (gcc -fcf-protection). There are
other differences, less significant IMO; .plt.sec is a likely candidate
for
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843479
Title:
gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in Exec format error
** Tags added: wsl
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843479
Title:
gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in Exec format error on WSL1
Status in gzip package in Ubuntu:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
31 matches
Mail list logo
