[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
This bug was fixed in the package binutils - 2.32.90.20190929-0ubuntu2 --- binutils (2.32.90.20190929-0ubuntu2) eoan; urgency=medium * Snapshot, taken from the 2.33 branch (20190929). - Fix PR25031, nm reports wrong address on 32bit. LP: #1845190. - Fix PR25018, readelf crash on 32bits. LP: #1844119. - [GOLD] Fix spurious "plugin needed to handle lto object" warnings. - GCC 10 related warning fixes. - i386: Adjust for new output format from readelf. * Include the test logs in the binutils-dev package. -- Matthias Klose Sun, 29 Sep 2019 07:37:06 +0200 ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190]
Impressively quick fix indeed, thanks! I haven't seen any test added though. While such ELF files shouldn't be common, it's a fairly basic feature and doesn't seem like requiring any complex test fixture, does it? Relying on diffoscope's test suite doesn't feel right. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
** Tags removed: rls-ee-incoming ** Tags added: rls-ee-notfixing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
I think this should land in Ubuntu as part of a regular snapshot upload of binutils. I.e. without any special cherrypicking. This may or might not be fixed in Eoan or f-cycle. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190]
thanks a ton for the quick fixes! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
** Changed in: binutils Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190]
Fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
** Changed in: binutils Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: In Progress Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190]
The binutils-2_33-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils- gdb.git;h=895b6d98785ba89819820aa5f4abed17fbb28c37 commit 895b6d98785ba89819820aa5f4abed17fbb28c37 Author: Alan Modra Date: Tue Sep 24 22:47:13 2019 +0930 PR25031, nm reports wrong address on 32bit Using saved_format breaks when nm is presented with multiple object files, some 32-bit and some 64-bit. PR 25031 * nm.c (print_format_string): New. (get_print_format): Delete saved_format. Move earlier. (set_print_width): Call get_print_format. (print_value): Use print_format_string. (cherry picked from commit 352f6bc3e5b23e76d8e6f56fb7db4e57d8f5d5bd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: In Progress Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190]
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils- gdb.git;h=352f6bc3e5b23e76d8e6f56fb7db4e57d8f5d5bd commit 352f6bc3e5b23e76d8e6f56fb7db4e57d8f5d5bd Author: Alan Modra Date: Tue Sep 24 22:47:13 2019 +0930 PR25031, nm reports wrong address on 32bit Using saved_format breaks when nm is presented with multiple object files, some 32-bit and some 64-bit. PR 25031 * nm.c (print_format_string): New. (get_print_format): Delete saved_format. Move earlier. (set_print_width): Call get_print_format. (print_value): Use print_format_string. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: In Progress Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
> on amd64 it works correctly: > > nm elfmix1.not_a > return42_or_3_long_name.o: > T return42_or_3 > return42_or_3_long_name.obj: > T return42_or_3 No, on amd64 the bug is the same as on i386. The correct output on both i386 and amd64 must be: return42_or_3_long_name.o: T return42_or_3 return42_or_3_long_name.obj: T return42_or_3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: New Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
** Tags added: rls-ee-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: New Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] Re: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
Launchpad has imported 2 comments from the remote bug at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. On 2019-09-24T11:10:32+00:00 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Created attachment 12001 example This happens since binutils 2.32.51.20190611 (The Debian version mostly tracks svn) and it was working on 2.32-8 (updated to 20190424) to reproduce: nm elfmix1.not_a nm: 42-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: 43-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: Mach-O.o: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.o: T return42_or_3 nm: return42_or_3_long_name.c: file format not recognized nm: regen_elfmix.sh: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.obj: ffa49ce8 T return42_or_3 before, with old binutils it was printed correctly nm elfmix1.not_a nm: 42-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: 43-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: Mach-O.o: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.o: T return42_or_3 nm: return42_or_3_long_name.c: file format not recognized nm: regen_elfmix.sh: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.obj: T return42_or_3 Looks like the returned output is half full of uninitialized values on amd64 it works correctly nm elfmix1.not_a nm: 42-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: 43-Mach-O.o: file format not recognized nm: Mach-O.o: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.o: T return42_or_3 nm: return42_or_3_long_name.c: file format not recognized nm: regen_elfmix.sh: file format not recognized return42_or_3_long_name.obj: T return42_or_3 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1845190/comments/0 On 2019-09-24T11:12:39+00:00 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Please see this Debian discussion for more information https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1845190/comments/1 ** Changed in: binutils Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: binutils Importance: Unknown => Medium ** Bug watch added: salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues #69 https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: New Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1845190] [NEW] binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work
Public bug reported: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 ** Affects: binutils Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) Status: Confirmed ** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #25031 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031 ** Also affects: binutils via https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845190 Title: binutils nm wrong output format breaks i386 nm work Status in binutils: Unknown Status in binutils package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: discovered with diffoscope autopkgregression, looks like a real bug, based on https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1845190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
