[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-07-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package librsvg - 2.48.7-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 --- librsvg (2.48.7-1ubuntu0.20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium * SRU new upstream release to focal (LP: #1884326) -- Olivier Tilloy Fri, 19 Jun 2020 23:19:37 +0200 ** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu Focal)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-07-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
I updated librsvg to 2.48.7-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 from focal-proposed in an otherwise fully up-to-date focal VM (amd64), logged out and back in, and did some extensive smoke testing, both targetted (opening and manipulating various SVG images in eog and gimp), and general (launched several

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-07-02 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Olivier, or anyone else affected, Accepted librsvg into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/2.48.7-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-07-02 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Hey Łukasz, that's a good point. Those are not public symbols, they are part of the implementation- specific layer of librsvg (all symbols named "rsvg_rust_*" fall in this category). Neither the C headers nor the GObject introspection and Vala vapi files installed by librsvg2-dev expose them.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-07-02 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hey Olivier! I looked at the librsvg upload in the queue just now. I'm a bit worried about the symbols removal in librsvg2-2. Looking at the diff: diff -Nru librsvg-2.48.2/debian/librsvg2-2.symbols librsvg-2.48.7/debian/librsvg2-2.symbols --- librsvg-2.48.2/debian/librsvg2-2.symbols

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-07-01 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Brian: librsvg is indeed not a direct dependency of the gnome-core metapackage, however it is a direct dependency of other core components and apps such as gnome-shell and eog. In that regard I think it qualifies, but we should probably clarify the policy to clearly map to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-06-30 Thread Brian Murray
The Stable Release Update policy for GNOME says "GNOME (only the core modules and apps, not the entirety of what is hosted on gnome.org) (approved on 2012-06-22)" . Is librsvg part of the core modules and apps? There has never been an SRU of librsvg before. ** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu Focal)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-06-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884326 Title: SRU the current 2.48.7

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884326] Re: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update

2020-06-19 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Attaching a debdiff for the SRU, please sponsor. ** Attachment added: "librsvg-focal.debdiff.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1884326/+attachment/5385451/+files/librsvg-focal.debdiff.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch