As it turns out, the situation is a bit more complex. Although ufw does provide the ufw-directoryserver profile, for some reason we don't install ufw profiles on Ubuntu:
https://git.launchpad.net/ufw/tree/debian/rules?h=ubuntu/master#n90 I'm not sure why that is the case, and git-blame isn't very helpful to clarify the question. I will try to ask around and see if I can understand the rationale behind this decision. ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943280 Title: OpenLDAP's ufw profile is redundant and can be removed Status in openldap package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: The openldap package currently carries its own ufw profile as a delta against its Debian counterpart. Ryan (Debian openldap maintainer) noticed that the ufw package already installs a profile that covers OpenLDAP as well as other related services: https://git.launchpad.net/ufw/tree/profiles/ufw-directoryserver I'm filing this bug to serve as a reminder to make sure that we remove this unnecessary delta from the openldap package. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1943280/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp