[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] Re: Xsessions has_option code error with fix

2023-01-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for xorg (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] Re: Xsessions has_option code error with fix

2022-11-29 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995236 Title: Xsessions has_option code error with fix Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] Re: Xsessions has_option code error with fix

2022-11-01 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Bug 1922414 covers one of the issues with has_option so please reword this bug to cover one other issue only. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995236 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] Re: Xsessions has_option code error with fix

2022-10-31 Thread Peter D.
And now OPTIONS has to be exported, and probably should be protected against being empty in the new file. So it becomes ${OPTIONS:-} and ${1:-} What else have I missed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] Re: Xsessions has_option code error with fix

2022-10-31 Thread Peter D.
Bother. There is a third problem, a scope issue of some sort. The errors in ~/.xsession.error go away if "has_options" is moved from Xsession to its own file in Xsession.d I don't see why sourceing it should make any difference, but it does. $ cat /etc/X11/Xsession.d/00 has_option () { #