** Changed in: nss-mdns (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to avahi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80900
Title:
Avahi daemon prevents resolution of FQDNs
** Changed in: avahi (Debian)
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
** Changed in: avahi (Debian)
Status: New => Unknown
** Changed in: avahi (Debian)
Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #393711
** Package changed: avahi (Debian) => nss-mdns (Debian)
--
You received this bug notific
This is fixed in Ubuntu 20.04 with nss-mdns 0.14 and later which does
proper split horizon handling.
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: nss-mdns (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you a
** Description changed:
Install Kubuntu Feisty
Set the ip address to dhcp for eth0 (ethernet port)
make sure the host name and domain name are set
Hostname computer1
DomainName mydomain.local
allow DHCP to assign the IP address
Ensure the computer details are registered in DNS
** Summary changed:
- How Can I Buy Soma Online? | Order Carisoprodol Online
+ Avahi daemon prevents resolution of FQDNs ending in ".local" due to false
negatives in the detection of ".local" networks
** Description changed:
Install Kubuntu Feisty
Set the ip address to dhcp for eth0 (ethern
I guess I am wrong about the "upstream security hole" thing. But I don't
know why you would use mDNS for serious security anyway.
mdns_minimal already causes a 4-second fallthrough (if AVAHI is disabled
at least).
So Lennart is ranting and screaming only about the [NOTFOUND=return]
line?
As if h
Apple, whose OS X Yosemite (10.10) will not even resolve DNS when
internet is down ("private networks don't exist"), simply chose the
wrong name for something that is basically only used by machines.
Their ".local" is not meant for manual use.
They could just as easily have called it ".mdns" or s
7 matches
Mail list logo