[Touch-packages] [Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-08-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chris, The package in -proposed fixed this bug. Test-case from description. Details below. root@ubuntu:~# apt-cache madison net-tools net-tools | 1.60-25ubuntu2.1 | http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ trusty-proposed/main ppc64el Packages [...]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403982] Re: mini.iso installer cannot load additional components

2015-01-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@nio-wiklund Hi, not sure why it didn't work for your cmdline. If you're still interested in debugging, the option you entered is correct, as you can see on net-retriever source code: if db_get debian-installer/allow_unauthenticated [ $RET = true ]; then log Not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1359439] Re: [ 7.287663] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start unit user@126.service: Unknown unit: user@126.service

2015-01-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@pitti Hi, Martin. Would you have any update on the process of resolving this (maybe someone/I can help?), or its severity (what's the impact?) Thanks a lot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd-shim in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403982] Re: mini.iso installer cannot load additional components

2015-01-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
There's a workaround available meanwhile -- if you want to use the currently available netboot image, and can afford skipping the GPG checks/its implications. Append this to the kernel command line: debian- installer/allow_unauthenticated=true -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403982] Re: mini.iso installer cannot load additional components

2015-01-27 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
You can find more info about that in preseed, debian installer options. Basically boot options taken by the installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnupg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1403982

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1311128] Re: Please incorporate gcc 4.8 revision 209515

2015-05-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks, Steve. I forwarded the request internally. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gcc-4.8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311128 Title: Please incorporate gcc 4.8 revision 209515 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-15 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Adam, I'd be inclined to say it's too late in the cycle [...] given the partial backports that very much touch common code, etc. That's certainly understandable. I believe it's possible to trim up the backports even more. AFAICT, most changes are contained inside #ifdef HWAES_CAPABLE

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-15 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Ok, the trimmed backports: - removed the patch which touched common code w/out #ifdef blocks. - now all changes are under #ifdef blocks, which helps analysis. Build log: ... ALL TESTS SUCCESSFUL. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/ss5/openssl-1.0.1f/test'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-15 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Adam, Does it help/improve the situation at all? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444241 Title: Add more POWER8 optimizations Status in openssl package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-15 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Well, a later SRU should be OK too, right? :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444241 Title: Add more POWER8 optimizations Status in openssl package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Here is the comparison / benchmarking of: 1) current package 2) current package + attached debdiff 3) upstream code It shows that: 1) performance of current package improves a *lot* with the attached debdiff; 2) performance of current package + attached debdiff is equal to the upstream's. $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
In summary: $ openssl speed -evp aes-128-gcm speedup: - 16 bytes: 3x - 64 bytes: 6.4x - 256 bytes: 13.8x - 1024 bytes: 17x - 8192 bytes: 18x $ openssl speed -evp aes-128-ctr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] [NEW] Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: There are some upstream commits that introduce optimizations with significant performance improvement for IBM POWER8. This patch introduces their minimal bits/changes in the source package. ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-04-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
In the patches, this line might not be as clear as intended: The 'backport' keyword in 'Origin:' just indicates it isn't equal to 'upstream'. isn't equal in the sense only the interesting changed files were kept, but not changed, and other files were removed from the diff. -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1311128] Re: Please incorporate gcc 4.8 revision 209515

2015-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gcc-4.8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311128 Title: Please incorporate gcc 4.8 revision

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1444241] Re: Add more POWER8 optimizations

2015-08-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks, Sebastien. Yes, the changes are in wily. For documentation purposes. The numbers in a KVM guest on POWER8 match those in comment #2. $ lsb_release -d Description:Ubuntu Wily Werewolf (development branch) $ dpkg -s openssl | grep ^Version: Version: 1.0.2d-0ubuntu1 $ openssl speed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1503286] Re: ISST-LTE: Boot of Ubuntu15.10 lpar fails: "mounting /dev/sdn2 on /root failed: Device or resource busy" [multipath]

2015-10-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
passing init= bootarg. BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. (initramfs) - Contact info: ---- Manju (manju...@in.ibm.com) A.P. (apu...@us.ibm.com) == Comment: #12 - M

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1561089] [NEW] Xenial: Error in postinstall script during package upgrade

2016-03-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: Noticed this while installing debug symbols for systemd: # apt install systemd-dbg ... Unpacking udev (229-3ubuntu1) over (229-2ubuntu1) ... ... Setting up udev (229-3ubuntu1) ... addgroup: The group `input' already exists as a system group. Exiting.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2017-02-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Christian, Thanks for handling it to xenial-updates. BTW, that point about the package to make the point release ISO is so that people who use the ISO as package repository (which happens in some scenarios like xCAT clusters), and not always get more updates from the internet, can get it.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667113] Re: System users appears in Ligthdm and user switcher (Accountsservice has no filter for shell types)

2017-02-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Christian, Thanks for handling this. > But the more that are affected the more I think then general solution in lightdm would be the right thing to do. Yes, that's my interpretation too -- and it was my impression from the beginning, with your report/analysis, as I couldn't find anything we

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2017-01-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Christian, For your consideration... Since this patch is mainly targeted at first-time installations of libvirt (so that the uid assignment can occur), it would be great if it can make 16.04.2 now that the date slipped 2 weeks (per the public release schedule), if at all possible... so that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2017-01-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification steps with just attached patch. Test 1) new user, uid available Result) libvirt-qemu uid is set to 64055 # id libvirt-qemu id: ‘libvirt-qemu’: no such user # getent passwd 64055 # # dpkg -i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2017-01-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Christian, Here's the patch for libvirt in Xenial. It's the very minimal changes required from Zesty/Debian in order to set the UID (and document the change in the NEWS file). I didn't backport the debconf warning stuff as it's not essentially required. Hopefully this is simple/conservative

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2017-01-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Christian, Alright! I'll provide the up-to-date backport for libvirt in Xenial and the SRU template. Per Colin's comment #21 it's not required to SRU base-passwd: > [snip] you should definitely not waste time SRUing base-passwd [snip] Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2017-01-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Okay, great! Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-passwd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637601 Title: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190 Status in libvirt: Fix

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2017-01-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Okay, thanks again for all you (excellent) support on all this, Christian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-passwd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637601 Title: UbuntuKVM: migration using

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
this on Debian and Ubuntu, right? For reference, this is the e-mail sent to Debian base-passwd: Forwarded Message Subject: request uid and gid allocation for libvirt-qemu Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:27:00 -0200 From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: ba

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi @paelzer, > I meant a Debian bug against base-passwd to begin with not a libvirt bug. > I think the Mail you have written is a good start, yet IMHO a related bug > can't hurt t track and make them more aware. Ah, ok. Yes, you're right. That is BTS #843881 [1]. > Yes it is primarily

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Christian Ehrhardt, Attaching PATCH v2 for Xenial. It only checks/sets the UID for libvirt-qemu user; no other actions/changes performed. ** Patch added: "xenial_libvirt_uidgid_v2.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For reference, Debian bug for libvirt is #844339 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-passwd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637601 Title: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190 Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Christian Ehrhardt, > Sorry to realize that only now, but please help me to clarify/avoid these issues? no problem; sure. > #1 On a given Xenial install as of today the files are owned by > libvirt-qemu:kvm (e.g. pools and images it creates). > Those files will still be owned by group

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Submitted patch v2 for Debian, addressing changes requested by Guido. (but not yet the getent/adduser concern of debian bug 621833, which I decided to first ask him about, so not to mix the changes upfront) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> There was a lot of extra mirroring on this - another bugproxy issue? Probably. Apologies for you getting that. Please disregard it. :/ > Also while I know the maintainer scripts already have the same issue > I today accidentally came by this >

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-21 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi @Christian. Cool. good news. BTW, I have to post some status/progress updates in this bug for internal tracking by other people; not meant at you. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-passwd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1637601] Re: UbuntuKVM: migration using NFS mount fails #190

2016-11-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> I still remember the internal process and its mirroring :-) I got you now.. ;-) [1] BTW, just checked in BTS how Guido would like to proceed w/ this one since the last patch (v3) submission ~1.5 weeks ago. Waiting. [1] https://insights.ubuntu.com/author/paelzer/ -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For easier reading, I'll break the description field apart, to split the comments that got merged there, into actual comments at Launchpad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
- modules udeb) in addition to 'multipath-tools' ** Description changed: - == Comment: #0 - Mauricio Faria De Oliveira <mauri...@br.ibm.com> - 2017-03-15 09:01:18 == ---Problem Description--- dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs On Ubuntu, multipath devices

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Patch verification on 17.04: --- Before: # dpkg -s multipath-tools-boot | grep ^Version: Version: 0.6.4-3ubuntu1 # lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img | grep dm-queue-length # After: # dpkg -i multipath-tools*.deb kpartx*.deb # dpkg -s multipath-tools-boot | grep ^Version:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Error logs: -- This error log is seen in the installer, and multipath devices are not created for such storage system: ... Mar 14 06:41:54 kernel: [ 0.00] Kernel command line: tasks=standard pkgsel/language-pack-patterns= pkgsel/install-language-support=false --- quiet /install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Patch verification on 16.04: --- multipath-tools source package: # sed -n '/vendor.*XtremIO/,/selector/ p' libmultipath/hwtable.c .vendor = "XtremIO", .product = "XtremApp", .features = DEFAULT_FEATURES,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
It's possible to reproduce this problem in a qemu-kvm guest, with an emulated disk: force the queue-length path selector. # name=mfo-1704 # disk=/var/lib/libvirt/images/$name.qcow2 # iso=/var/lib/libvirt/images/zesty-server-ppc64el.iso.2017-03-14 # qemu-img create -f qcow2 $disk 128g #

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673350] Re: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs

2017-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks, @cyphermox and @smb. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673350 Title: dm-queue-length module is not included in installer/initramfs Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668535] Re: Ubuntu17.04-Failed to activate (encrypted) Swap Partition

2017-04-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668535 Title: Ubuntu17.04-Failed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800877] Re: iproute2/xenial: Add support for the VF Trust setting (fix IPv6 multicast under SR-IOV on Mellanox adapters)

2018-10-31 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "iproute2_xenial_vf-trust.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute2/+bug/1800877/+attachment/5207579/+files/iproute2_xenial_vf-trust.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800877] [NEW] iproute2/xenial: Add support for the VF Trust setting (fix IPv6 multicast under SR-IOV on Mellanox adapters)

2018-10-31 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: [Impact] * An VM's VF cannot receive IPv6 multicast traffic from other VMs' VFs in the same Mellanox adapter _if_ its VF trust setting is not enabled, and on Xenial currently iproute2 _cannot_ enable it. * This breaks IPv6 NDP (Neighbor Discovery Protocol) in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800877] Re: iproute2/xenial: Add support for the VF Trust setting (fix IPv6 multicast under SR-IOV on Mellanox adapters)

2018-11-01 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing. This is the debdiff v2, addressing the points you brought up (numbered patches, bug-ubuntu dep3 tag). cheers, Mauricio ** Patch removed: "iproute2_xenial_vf-trust.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800877] Re: iproute2/xenial: Add support for the VF Trust setting (fix IPv6 multicast under SR-IOV on Mellanox adapters)

2018-11-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Eric, This is the v3 debdiff with the patches updated to apply with no offset messages per your request. Thanks, Mauricio -- Applying patch debian/patches/1008-vf_trust_dddf1b44126e.patch patching file include/linux/if_link.h Applying patch debian/patches/1009-vf_trust_b6d77d9ee312.patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800877] Re: iproute2/xenial: Add support for the VF Trust setting (fix IPv6 multicast under SR-IOV on Mellanox adapters)

2018-11-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification successful on xenial-proposed. Updated verification tags. Steps = Setup 1) Enable xenial-proposed and install the iproute2 package: --- $ echo 'deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed main restricted' | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xenial-proposed.list deb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800877] Re: iproute2/xenial: Add support for the VF Trust setting (fix IPv6 multicast under SR-IOV on Mellanox adapters)

2018-11-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
autopkgtests for ubuntu-fan (triggered by this iproute2 upload) The test failure in ubuntu-fan's lxd test (the thing that is failing in these autopkgtests) does look flaky. Looking at autopkgtest logs for ubuntu-fan on xenial, there's a series of retriggers for the _same_ version of docker.io

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800877] Re: iproute2/xenial: Add support for the VF Trust setting (fix IPv6 multicast under SR-IOV on Mellanox adapters)

2018-11-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
autopkgtests for open-vm-tools, failures in amd64 and i386. These are consistently failing since May 14th, 2018 for a lot of other packages, thus not a change from this upload. Thanks, Mauricio -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1795658] Re: xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently

2018-10-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "systemd-xenial_restart-failed.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1795658/+attachment/5195852/+files/systemd-xenial_restart-failed.debdiff ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1795658] [NEW] xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently

2018-10-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
tps://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3166 [3] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/sf199312 ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu To

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1795658] Re: xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently

2018-10-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
More details on the verification of test package from Launchpad PPA) --- Test-case) $ cat < Sep 29 10:59:00 havers systemd[1]: Started fail-on-restart.service. Sep 29 10:59:00 havers systemd[1]: fail-on-restart.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Sep 29 10:59:00 havers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1795658] Re: xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently

2018-10-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1795658] Re: xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently

2018-10-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done on Xenial. Changing verification tags. -- Testcase) $ cat <" $ dpkg -s systemd | grep ^Version: Version: 229-4ubuntu21.5 $ sudo systemctl start fail-on-restart $ systemctl status -n0 fail-on-restart fail-on-restart.service Loaded: loaded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1795658] Re: xenial systemd reports 'inactive' instead of 'failed' for service units that repeatedly failed to restart / failed permanently

2018-10-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Positive test results with xenial-proposed have also been verified by a company interested in this fix, in their scenario/application. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Package Contents :: Trusty == No regressions in ca-certificate DEB file after the changes to build the UDEB file. The only difference is due to the changes in changelog file and package version. dpkg-deb -c (content listing) --- $ dpkg-deb -c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1807023-debian-installer-trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220104/+files/lp1807023-debian-installer-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Testing :: Trusty = original wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/main /installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu318.44/images/netboot/ubuntu- installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz} ~ # cat /etc/default-release trusty ~ # ls -d /usr/lib/ssl/certs ls:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1807023-debian-installer-xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220102/+files/lp1807023-debian-installer-xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Testing :: Xenial = original wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main /installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu451.26/images/netboot/ubuntu- installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz} ~ # cat /etc/default-release xenial ~ # ls -d /usr/lib/ssl/certs ls:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact]  * The installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS    certificates because ca-certificates is not available    in the installer environment.  * This causes wget/download errors for preseed files on    HTTPS servers (or HTTP servers that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The ca-certificates fix for Xenial and Trusty include the changes to build the (new) udeb. The normal deb package has been verified for regressions (next comments) and it is correct, with no functional changes whatsoever. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Package Contents :: Xenial == No regressions in ca-certificate DEB file after the changes to build the UDEB file. The only difference is due to the changes in changelog file and package version. dpkg-deb -c (content listing) --- $ dpkg-deb -c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification :: disco-proposed --- Okay, not strictly required as not yet a Stable Release, but doing anyway. Successful. $ wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/disco-proposed/main /installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu560/images/netboot/ubuntu-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification :: cosmic-proposed --- Successful. $ wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/cosmic-proposed/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu557.1/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz} $ virt-install \ --name cosmic \ --vcpus 2 \

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220173/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220172/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification :: bionic-proposed --- Successful. $ wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-proposed/main /installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu543.4/images/netboot/ubuntu- installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz} $ virt-install \ --name bionic \ --vcpus 2 \

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220103/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1807023] Re: installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS certificates (ca-certificates missing)

2018-12-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220101/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] [NEW] Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Medium Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Chan

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
with debug we could confirm that other fields in the backup superblock are invalid, such as the device size, which was not checked for not being a whole-disk device, and the bytes length, which is greater than the superblock structure size (8243 vs 1024). so, the fix to check for the bytes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
original package: # dpkg -s libblkid1 | grep ^Version: Version: 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8 # LIBBLKID_DEBUG=all udevadm test-builtin blkid /sys/block/loop0/loop0p1 ... 4924: libblkid: LOWPROBE: [28] ext4: 4924: libblkid: LOWPROBE: reuse

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
modified package: # dpkg -s libblkid1 | grep ^Version: Version: 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8+test20190903b1 # LIBBLKID_DEBUG=all udevadm test-builtin blkid /sys/block/loop0/loop0p1 ... 7289: libblkid: LOWPROBE: [28] ext4: 7289: libblkid: LOWPROBE:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
udev builtin blkid ignores the checksum error: nilfs_valid_sb() @ nilfs.c:96 return blkid_probe_verify_csum(pr, crc, le32_to_cpu(sb->s_sum)); blkid_probe_verify_csum() @ probe.c:1576-1687 if (csum != expected) { ... DBG(LOWPROBE, ul_debug(

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Problem: - the ext4 filesystem is detected correctly at the beginning of the partition. - the nilfs2 filesystem is detected incorrectly at the end of the partition. - the nilfs2 checksum is invalid, but that is ignored by udev builtin blkid. - the detection of more than one filesystems causes an

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This problem can be reproduced with a synthetic test case. Essentially, 1) create a zero-filled disk image with one partition. 2) format it as ext4. 3) insert the nilfs2 magic bytes at the right position. 4) insert the nilfs2 bytes field at the right position. -- Step 1) # dd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
-Xenial supported releases have it. ** Patch added: "lp1842437_util-linux.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1842437/+attachment/5287043/+files/lp1842437_util-linux.debdiff ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oli

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Eric, thanks for reporting that. I couldn't reproduce the build failure on LXC with apt dist-upgrade on xenial-updates nor xenial-proposed, and it built successfully on PPAs a while ago (for the test packages), so it seems something changed in the PPA builders. I'll investigate this as per our

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The problem is reproducible in the sbuild-launchpad-chroot for xenial/amd64, using the source package for util-linux currently in xenial-updates (i.e., no regression from debdiff, as expected since changes/error are unrelated) The minimal command-line for that is: $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Ah, this is bug 1843674, checking for similar fixes. (thanks Matthew Ruffell for pointing it out on IRC.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
s/this is bug/this is _similar_ to/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437 Title: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Workaround of disabling the 4 tests in the 'script' component (which calls openpty() upfront and thus cause the failure) makes the test-suite finish successfully. $ ./tests/run.sh \ --srcdir=/build/util-linux-kzgHhT/util-linux-2.27.1 \ --builddir=/build/util-linux-kzgHhT/util-linux-2.27.1 \

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The reporter confirmed the boot problem doesn't happen anymore. Moving forward with the SRU. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Eric, thanks! Really appreciate your help debugging this issue. Per Colin's comment, he mentions on #launchpad-ops (internal) when there are launchpad chroot changes -- so we can confirm it's been updated after the package becomes Fix Released. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The real fix for the openpty() problem on Launchpad xenial buildd is in livecd-rootfs currently in xenial-proposed, and is verified. (LP 1844504 comment 15) Once the Launchpad builders are updated with that, we can proceed with another build attempt, and hopefully move this SRU forward. Thanks

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846787] Re: systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files

2019-12-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The autopkgtests regression on docker.io are unrelated to this change. The failure is on debian/tests/basic-smoke; it happens because 'debootstrap stable ' fails the gpg verification of the Release file -- the keys used for the Buster stable release are not found in Xenial's

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846787] Re: systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files

2019-12-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The remaining autopkgtests regressions (nplan/amd64 and gvfs/s390x) are also unrelated to this change. - nplan/amd64 passed with 3 retests: Before: test_mix_bridge_on_bond (__main__.TestNetworkManager) ... FAIL ... integration.py FAIL non-zero exit status 1 After:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846787] Re: systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files

2019-12-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For documentation purposes, the (unrelated) autopkgtest failure on docker.io is reported/worked on bug 1855481. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846787] Re: systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files

2019-12-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done on xenial-proposed. With the new systemd and dbus packages, there are no leaked sessions after the test-case of ssh loop. The autopkgtests regressions reported previously are unrelated to this change (comments #11 to #16). cheers, Mauricio Setup --- $ sudo snap install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1847512] Re: xenial: leftover scope units for Kubernetes transient mounts

2019-12-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846787 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787 Verification done with fix for bug 1846787 on xenial-proposed (systemd 229-4ubuntu21.23). With the new systemd packages there are no leaked scope units for transient mounts. cheers, Mauricio Setup ---

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846787] Re: systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files

2019-12-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For documentation purposes, The systemd upload for this LP bug also resolves LP bug 1847512 (xenial: leftover scope units for Kubernetes transient mounts). Verification steps posted on that bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846787] Re: systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files

2019-12-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Summary of autopkg regressions systemd: - most tests passed on retest (thanks ddstreet) - still failing: gvfs/s390x, docker.io/all archs but armhf, nplan/amd64 dbus: - no new failures. Looking at the pending failures/regressions. systemd -- umockdev/0.8.11-2 (i386) passed on retest.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-10-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The reported failures for autopkgtest are unrelated to this change on the probe of the nilfs filesystem. Two are apparently failures in handling test reboot, and another is lack of a kernel module. I'll ask for retries on these, and do a quick check on this module error. Details: ---

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1847512] Re: xenial: leftover scope units for Kubernetes transient mounts

2019-10-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846787 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787 ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847512 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-10-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
No problems with the autopkgtest results for this SRU: - nplan xenial/s390x [1] is failing since September 1st - nplan xenial/armhf [2] is failing since May 14th - systemd xenial/amd [3] passed with a re-run [4] (thanks ddstret) cheers, Mauricio [1]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-10-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done with xenial-proposed. # dpkg -s libblkid1 | grep -i version Version: 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.9 # apt-cache madison libblkid1 | grep xenial-proposed libblkid1 | 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.9 | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages Test steps are described in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1847512] [NEW] xenial: leftover scope units for Kubernetes transient mounts

2019-10-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
5f7/volumes/kubernetes.io~secret/default-token-24k4f $ [1] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/64137 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787 ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: M

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1847512] Re: xenial: leftover scope units for Kubernetes transient mounts

2019-10-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846787 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787 Marking this bug as a duplicate of bug 1846787 for the systemd fix. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1846787 systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files -- You received this

  1   2   3   >