[Touch-packages] [Bug 1274466] Re: apt-ftparchive on-disk cache format changed between lucid and precise, results in Packages files with silently corrupted checksums fields

2014-09-08 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: - Test case: - - generate a cachedb with apt-ftparchive from lucid via -apt-ftparchive --db old-db 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb + TEST CASE: + 1. generate a cachedb with apt-ftparchive from lucid via +    apt-ftparchive --db old-db packages 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb Packages.1 -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1274466] Re: apt-ftparchive on-disk cache format changed between lucid and precise, results in Packages files with silently corrupted checksums fields

2014-09-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: TEST CASE: 1. generate a cachedb with apt-ftparchive from lucid via    apt-ftparchive --db old-db packages 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb Packages.1 - use apt-ftparchive from precise and run -    apt-ftparchive --db old-db 2vcard_0.5-3_all.deb -   and verify that the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1324399] Re: apt-get failing to show progress with yes command

2014-09-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324399 Title: apt-get failing to show progress with yes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365855] Re: 100% cpu in Xorg when xorg is started via lightdm

2014-09-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Attachment added: lspci https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365855/+attachment/4200324/+files/lspci.out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365855] Re: 100% cpu in Xorg when xorg is started via lightdm

2014-09-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Attachment added: xorg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365855/+attachment/4200325/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365855] Re: 100% cpu in Xorg when xorg is started via lightdm

2014-09-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Attachment added: lightdm log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1365855/+attachment/4200326/+files/lightdm.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365855] Re: 100% cpu in Xorg when xorg is started via lightdm

2014-09-10 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks, I attached the logs you requested. With 1.11.9-0ubuntu1 the problem presists. I don't know when exactly it started but it happend relatively recently. It might be a issue with the setup of X done by lightdm, because when I launch my session via gdm I don't see this problem. Whats

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-09-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/phablet-tools/pkcon-allow-untrusted ** Changed in: phablet-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: phablet-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365855] Re: 100% cpu in Xorg when xorg is started via lightdm

2014-09-11 Thread Michael Vogt
I installed unity8-destktop-session-x11 to test click on the desktop but I did not change any config (to my knowledge :) except for installing this package. I actually thought I had unity8-desktop-session-mir installed, but it seems that during testing I moved to the other one. And indeed, when I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371058] Re: Latest apt returns Hash Sum mismatch for file: URI:s

2014-09-18 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Critical ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #762079 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371058] Re: Regression: Latest apt security update returns Hash Sum mismatch for file: URI:s

2014-09-18 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: debdiff with the fix for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1371058/+attachment/4207352/+files/apt_0.7.25.3ubuntu9.17.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371058] Re: Regression: Latest apt security update returns Hash Sum mismatch for file: URI:s

2014-09-18 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: debdiff with the fix for trusty https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1371058/+attachment/4207371/+files/apt_1.0.1ubuntu2.4.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371058] Re: Regression: Latest apt security update returns Hash Sum mismatch for file: URI:s

2014-09-18 Thread Michael Vogt
Note that this also fixes a segfault due to a broken FileFD::ReadOnlyGzip in this particular apt version. ** Patch added: debdiff with the fix for precise https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1371058/+attachment/4207383/+files/apt_0.8.16%7Eexp12ubuntu10.20.debdiff -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1371058] Re: Regression: Latest apt security update returns Hash Sum mismatch for file: URI:s

2014-09-18 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks a lot Stefan (comment #4) for confirming that the patch works and I'm very sorry for this regression. I created a PPA with the fix. It can be added via: $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:mvo/lp1371058 It contains packages for apt with the debdiff attached here applied. So if you are running

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1245826] Re: Allow applying a hook to multiple files

2014-09-22 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1245826-multiple-hookfiles -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245826 Title: Allow applying a hook to multiple files Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1245826] Re: Allow applying a hook to multiple files

2014-09-22 Thread Michael Vogt
This feature is also useful for the click-systemd and click-bin-path packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245826 Title: Allow applying a hook to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1318616] Re: lts-trusty enablement in precise

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Vogt
I just finished a full upgrade with the xorg-lts-transitional package and can confirm that it works. Without the package bug #1347964 will be triggered so it would be good if this could go in soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Vogt
And I just verified that the commit before the offending one (66706285) fully works and upgrades the system correctly. The immediate-configure property is also better honored. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Vogt
This diff works for me: diff --git a/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc b/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc index 393f836..57d4b5a 100644 --- a/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc +++ b/apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc @@ -406,6 +406,12 @@ bool pkgPackageManager::SmartConfigure(PkgIterator Pkg, int if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: diff with the fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1347721/+attachment/4164541/+files/lp1347721.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Vogt
Hm, now that saucy is closed, how can I upload a updated apt into saucy- updates that contains the fix? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1347721 Title: Saucy -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-28 Thread Michael Vogt
Some more work is needed fo the patch, its eliminating too many case. But the direction is there, the SmartConfigure() is currently trying to configure too much too early when its not really needed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-29 Thread Michael Vogt
A improved version of the patch, I tested it with: - precise build chroot - trusty - saucy build chroot - trusty - trusty build chroot - utopic (2014-07-29) and it worked for those cases correctly. The bug was that apt tried to SmartUnPack packages that were dependencies but did not need

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-29 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Critical Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-29 Thread Michael Vogt
I also did a precise-trusty-utopic upgrade cycle with the patch (the precise base that triggered #1347964 before) and again all good. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-29 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Milestone: None = ubuntu-14.04.2 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New = In Progress

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-29 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch removed: diff with the fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1347721/+attachment/4164541/+files/lp1347721.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1381570] [NEW] libuuid1 uses chsh in postinst which breaks upgrades

2014-10-15 Thread Michael Vogt
. This is debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764244 ** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Critical ** Changed in: util-linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1382401] [NEW] Easy to trigger 404/416 errors after recent security update

2014-10-17 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The recent security update make it easy to trigger debian bug #710924 - i.e. apt does not deal well with 416 requests from the remote server. TEST CASE: 1 install latest apt from security 2 run sudo apt-get update 3 run sudo apt-get update again and ctrl somewhere in the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1381570] Re: libuuid1 uses chsh in postinst which breaks upgrades

2014-10-22 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1381570 Title: libuuid1 uses chsh in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1043298] Re: more information about errors on update failure

2014-10-23 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043298 Title: more information about errors on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1385793] Re: Merge 1.6-4 from debian

2014-10-27 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385793 Title: Merge 1.6-4 from debian Status in “gzip”

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1387090] [NEW] boot breaks if /etc/machine-id is missing

2014-10-29 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks. Once this bug is fixed we can modify live-build so that it remove /etc /machine-id from the generated live rootfs instead of truncating it. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1387090] Re: boot breaks if /etc/machine-id is missing

2014-10-29 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks. For our goal of a empty /etc this is bad. + + Once this bug is fixed we can modify live-build so that it remove /etc + /machine-id from the generated live rootfs instead of truncating it. -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1387090] Re: boot breaks if /etc/machine-id is missing

2014-10-29 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: - When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks. This is - problematic for things like live-build which should remove the installer - image's /etc/machine-id. + When no /etc/machine-id file is present the boot breaks. + + Once this bug is fixed we can modify

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1385475] Re: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/dbus-property-service_0.7_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/autopilot-touch/apparmor/click.rules',

2014-10-29 Thread Michael Vogt
Increase importance as this breaks upgrades. ** Changed in: autopilot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Critical ** Changed in: dbus-property-service (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1386354] Re: package click 0.4.21.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2014-10-30 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport. What do you get if you run: $ sudo apt-get install -f ? Do you have a main.log file somewhere in /var/log/dist-upgrade/* (maybe in a surdirectory)? Having that attached to this bugreport would be helperful to find out what exactly happend. Thanks, Michael -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1232130] Re: Uninstalling an app doesn't stop it

2014-10-02 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks Colin and sorry for the trouble. I looked into this now and reworked the way that the stopping happens. It seems to be reliable now and gets the correct appid that is then passed to app-launch-stop. However the app still does not stop because ubuntu-app-stop needs to talk to the users

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1232130] Re: Uninstalling an app doesn't stop it

2014-10-02 Thread Michael Vogt
I pushed a version that correctly gets the dbus session bus and stops the app for click unregister in lp:~mvo/click/lp1232130-kill-on- remove-2/ - however its not yet working under PK I'm looking into this now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1377025] Re: twice 'apt-mark hold package' to same package crashed

2014-10-06 Thread Michael Vogt
A segfault is a bug. Unfortunately I can not reproduce it on my 14.04 system. ** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378680] [NEW] Insecure tempfile handling

2014-10-08 Thread Michael Vogt
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Apt creates the tempfile for apt-get changelog in a insecure fashion. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763780 for the details ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378680] Re: Insecure tempfile handling

2014-10-08 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: debdiff for trusty https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1378680/+attachment/4228234/+files/apt_1.0.1ubuntu2.5.debdiff ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Utopic) Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378680] Re: Insecure tempfile handling

2014-10-08 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: precise debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1378680/+attachment/4228233/+files/apt_0.8.16%7Eexp12ubuntu10.21.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1232130] Re: Uninstalling an app doesn't stop it

2014-10-09 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232130 Title: Uninstalling an app doesn't

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1245826] Re: Allow applying a hook to multiple files

2014-10-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245826 Title: Allow applying a hook to multiple files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1379657] [NEW] Run click hook run-user in the ubuntu-core image

2014-10-10 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The ubuntu-touch image uses the click-user-hoks.conf upstart session hook to run click hook run-user so that the hooks for the user are updated. The core images have /usr/lib/systemd/user/click-user-hooks.service that does the same but apparently its not always working

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1379657] Re: Run click hook run-user in the ubuntu-core image

2014-10-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: The ubuntu-touch image uses the click-user-hoks.conf upstart session hook to run click hook run-user so that the hooks for the user are - updated. Something similar needs to be done on the ubuntu-core system- - image images. + updated. + + The core images have

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1379657] Re: Run click hook run-user in the ubuntu-core image

2014-10-10 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = High ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo) -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392744] [NEW] mako/vivid does not show install progress

2014-11-14 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: I use a n4 with the vivid channel and I'm on image #20. When I go to a app in the store and click on Install I see now change in the UI, i.e. no download progress, no change in the button etc. But I do see activity in the u-d-m download logs and eventually the screen will

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393335] [NEW] fstrim slows down mixed ssd/hdd considerable

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: I have a ssd/hdd system where the ssd is used for the system and most of home is on a large hdd. I noticed that the weekly fstrim cron job slows the system down considerable, including e.g. firefox and the desktop. iotop reports: otal DISK READ : 0.00 B/s | Total

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393335] Re: fstrim slows down mixed ssd/hdd considerable

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: I have a ssd/hdd system where the ssd is used for the system and most of home is on a large hdd. I noticed that the weekly fstrim cron job slows the system down considerable, including e.g. firefox and the desktop. iotop reports: otal DISK READ :

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393542] Re: SRU: exfat not detected by blkid

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393542] Re: SRU: exfat not detected by blkid

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393542 Title: SRU: exfat not detected by blkid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1384724] Re: click chroots do not have intltool

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Vogt
This is fixed with click 0.4.34.2 (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click/0.4.34.2): click (0.4.34.2) vivid; urgency=medium ... [ David Planella ] * Adds internationalization tools and CMake macros required by the new Qt Creator app and scope templates that provide internationalization

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393698] Re: Cross qmake to the chroots

2014-11-19 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport. I'm happy to add this, but some changes are required: Rename the package to qt5-qmake-arm-linux-gnueabihf so that it follows the same convention as the other tools, this way click chroot.py can install it in the same way as g++/pkg-config and does the right thing for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1390919] Re: Scope template cannot be running for devel emulator

2014-11-19 Thread Michael Vogt
? ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Assignee: Michael Vogt (mvo) = Zoltan Balogh (bzoltan) ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1394256] Re: click user hooks are not run when click install --all-users is used

2014-11-19 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1394256-run-user-hooks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394256 Title: click user hooks are not run when click install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1394533] [NEW] provide a way to upgrade a click chroot

2014-11-20 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: After a click chroot is created there is currently no way to upgrade it. This is important if e.g. libraries in the framework get added. ** Affects: click (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358294] Re: App .config not removed when app uninstalled

2014-08-20 Thread Michael Vogt
I agree with Colin here, we need to get find all directories and consider if removing the data is something we should do or offer a choice to the user. If its important to remove the config, the attached (untested) patch should work , I will try to get it into better shape soon (proper test,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358294] Re: App .config not removed when app uninstalled

2014-08-20 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1358294-config-removal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358294 Title: App .config not removed when app uninstalled Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358294] Re: App .config not removed when app uninstalled

2014-08-20 Thread Michael Vogt
I attached a branch *if* we want to to this. However I share the concerns of Jamie and Seth that this needs some more spec work. Especially from the design team if its desirable to remove the data on uninstall. I like the idea of having a UI for this. But we could remove the cache data. ** Patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358294] Re: App .config not removed when app uninstalled

2014-08-22 Thread Michael Vogt
The attached branch is now in line with Michał's comment #9 - it will delete the $XDG_{CONFIG,CACHE}_DIR but leave the data dir. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1346723] Re: Cannot delete my chroot.

2014-08-22 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: click Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346723

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1353935] Re: click packages fail with mysterious error when disk is full

2014-08-22 Thread Michael Vogt
We can do multiple things here, we can test before install via statvfs() if there is enough free space, but that won't help if the spacing is filling up while installing. So we need to ensure dpkg reports a out-of- diskspace error via e.g. the status-fd (which we are currently not using AFAIK. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Vogt
Hi, this is doing it in a different way than my previous patch that does not require a interactive answer during install. It does require however that the patch goes to the packagekit upstream people. This needs the lp:~mvo/click/lp1360582-honor-enum-only-trusted/ branch too. ** Patch added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Vogt
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #83075 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83075 ** Also affects: click via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83075 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Vogt
@alexander: we definitely need to coordinate the landing. For a hotfix I created lp:~mvo/click/lp1360582-hotfix that implements Colins suggestion in #5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-08-27 Thread Michael Vogt
** Project changed: click = packagekit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360582 Title: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-08-27 Thread Michael Vogt
The packagekit patch has landed upstream and I pushed it into utopic now. Next step is that the SDK need to run pkcon --allow-untrusted when it installs the locally build click. Plus it needs to add a versionized dependency to packagekit-tools (= 0.8.17-4ubuntu2) to ensure the commandline option

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-08-28 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu/lp1360582 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360582 Title: Can't manually install clicks Signature

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1360582] Re: Can't manually install clicks Signature verification error since #205

2014-09-02 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1360582-honor-enum-only-trusted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1360582 Title: Can't manually install clicks Signature

[Touch-packages] [Bug 778054] Re: Trouble when removing transitional packages

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Vogt
The version of system-config-printer in utopic does no longer depend on python-gobject. ** Changed in: system-config-printer (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365010] [NEW] [FFe] support multi-arch

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The gir1.2-* libraries are currently using /usr/lib/girepository-1.0 - this makes installing them as Multi-Arch: same impossible. We should instead follow what debian is doing in experimental and install into /usr/lib/$triplet/girepository-1.0. ** Affects:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1365010] Re: [FFe] support multi-arch

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Vogt
** Summary changed: - support multi-arch + [FFe] support multi-arch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365010 Title: [FFe] support multi-arch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1330770] Re: click packages rely upon tls for integrity and authenticity

2014-07-14 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/debsigs-verify -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1330770 Title: click packages rely upon tls for integrity and authenticity

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1330770] Re: click packages rely upon tls for integrity and authenticity

2014-07-15 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1338994] Re: Scope failed to install: IsADirectoryError

2014-07-15 Thread Michael Vogt
I followed your steps and ran the last one (./click.sh) in a loop for ~1.5h without hitting the error. The image I used is r131. Is there anything else I can do to try to reproduce. ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1345606] Re: Can't create amd64 chroot - Unable to locate package g++-x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-07-21 Thread Michael Vogt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1319153 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319153 Thanks for your bugreport. This is fixed in utopic. If its important to you we can consider a backport of the fix, please followup on #1319153. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1319153

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1346094] Re: API to list the supported frameworks

2014-07-21 Thread Michael Vogt
I think that is a good idea to provide information about this, I have a branch at lp:~mvo/click/frameworks.json that adds the information about deprecated/current/devel to the frameworks. Extending the branch to list that is simple enough. One open question for me is where the information about

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1342858] Re: old click packages are not always cleaned out

2014-07-21 Thread Michael Vogt
I don't quite see the same here on my n4, I only have: $ ls -l /var/lib/apparmor/clicks/*json |wc -l 33 $ click list|wc -l 30 $ sudo click list|wc -l 22 And when further investigating I see that filemanager is in two versions installed (one for phablet, one for root): $ ls -l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1343039] Re: Cannot install chroot

2014-07-21 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport. This sounds like there is some sort of network problem. Could you please let use now if: $ sudo apt-get update works corrently for you? And what the output of the command: $ w3m -dump http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/utopic/Release.gpg in a terminal is? **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1346723] Re: Cannot delete my chroot.

2014-07-22 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346723 Title: Cannot delete my

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1346723] Re: Cannot delete my chroot.

2014-07-22 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport. The part that is failing is the umount after the chroot got cleaned. This part is done by the share/qtcreator/ubuntu/scripts/click_destroy_target in the qtcreator- plugin-ubuntu tree (see lines 33pp of the script). So I simply reassigning to click without any further

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1346723] Re: Cannot delete my chroot.

2014-07-22 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1346723-chroot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346723 Title: Cannot delete my chroot. Status in Click packages: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-25 Thread Michael Vogt
** Attachment added: Chroot that triggers the bug with a small set of dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1347721/+attachment/4162808/+files/upgrade-bug-smaller4.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-25 Thread Michael Vogt
It seems like the issue is the following: There is a dependency loop mountall-udev-procps-initscripts-mountall. When apt tries to deal with it, it configures them all initially together, then it finds the libplymouth4 dependency of mountall that is not unpacked yet and inserts the unpack at this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1347721] Re: Saucy - Trusty upgrade failed: procps fails to configure

2014-07-25 Thread Michael Vogt
I bisected this now (as the precise apt did not trigger the bug in the chroot) and it it appears to be caused by: 42d51f333e8ef522fed02cdfc48663488d56c3a3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1383289] Re: Dropping a key into the list of keys fails

2015-02-06 Thread Michael Vogt
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1383289 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358294] Re: App .config not removed when app uninstalled

2015-01-19 Thread Michael Vogt
Is there consensus on this now? I'm happy to land the branch, is Jamies comment in #15 addressed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358294 Title: App .config

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358294] Re: App .config not removed when app uninstalled

2015-01-21 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Vogt (mvo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1232130] Re: Uninstalling an app doesn't stop it

2015-01-21 Thread Michael Vogt
** Branch linked: lp:~mvo/click/lp1232130-kill-on-remove-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-touch-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232130 Title: Uninstalling an app doesn't stop it

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1330770] Re: click packages rely upon tls for integrity and authenticity

2015-01-16 Thread Michael Vogt
I just noticed the open task for ubuntu-system-settings about doing a addtional hashsum check for the download. Fwiw, click is already doing a gpg verification before the install so corrupted/MITMed clicks will not get installed there. Having the hash check may still be a good idea for e.g. better

[Touch-packages] [Bug 972077] Re: apt repository disk format has race conditions

2015-03-09 Thread Michael Vogt
Fwiw, we have support for the by-hash scheme in apt in experimetnal: https://github.com/Debian/apt/blob/debian/experimental/apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc#L1222 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429041] Re: Autoremoval not working reliable on precise

2015-03-06 Thread Michael Vogt
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429041 Title: Autoremoval not working reliable on precise

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429041] Re: Autoremoval not working reliable on precise

2015-03-06 Thread Michael Vogt
** Patch added: possible fix for this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1429041/+attachment/4335982/+files/apt_0.8.16%7Eexp12ubuntu10.23.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429041] [NEW] Autoremoval not working reliable on precise

2015-03-06 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections in precise is not working reliable. Apt is not always looking at the section of the version to be installed but instead may look at a random versions section. This breaks apt-get autoremove for no-longer-required kernels. ** Affects: apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429041] Re: Autoremoval not working reliable on precise

2015-03-06 Thread Michael Vogt
** Description changed: The APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections in precise is not working reliable. Apt is not always looking at the section of the version to be installed but - instead may look at the install version section. + instead may look at a random versions section. This breaks apt-get

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1431696] [NEW] Please make ubuntu-download-manager a or dependency for 3.0

2015-03-13 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: The current system-image-common package in the https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/ubuntu/systemimage/+build/7052762 PPA contains: Depends: ..., ubuntu-download-manager, For snappy we would like to have ubuntu-download-manager | python3-pycurl to avoid pulling in this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1431704] [NEW] system-image-cli shows -C FILE but its a directory now

2015-03-13 Thread Michael Vogt
Public bug reported: A minor thing. system-image-cli --help shows that the -C option takes a file. My understanding is that in 3.0 it takes a directory (as well?). Would be nice if the --help output could be updated. ** Affects: system-image (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1431877] Re: [FFe] Merge fixes from debian/sid

2015-03-13 Thread Michael Vogt
)  -- Michael Vogt m...@debian.org Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:54:03 +0100 apt (1.0.9.6) unstable; urgency=medium   [ Michael Vogt ]   * Fix missing URIStart() for https downloads   * Add regression test for the previous commit   [ David Kalnischkies ]   * 128 KiB DSC files ought

  1   2   3   4   >