[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378095] Re: aa-complain traceback when marking multiple profiles

2015-04-03 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Trusty

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378095] Re: aa-complain traceback when marking multiple profiles

2015-04-03 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: tools-fix-multi-profile-trusty.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1378095/+attachment/4364898/+files/tools-fix-multi-profile-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378095] Re: aa-complain traceback when marking multiple profiles

2015-04-03 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: tools-fix-multi-profile-vivid.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1378095/+attachment/4364897/+files/tools-fix-multi-profile-vivid.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378095] Re: aa-complain traceback when marking multiple profiles

2015-04-03 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: + [SRU justification] + + [Impact] + $ sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.lib.postfix.* Setting /etc/apparmor.d/usr.lib.postfix.anvil to complain mode. Traceback (most recent call last): - File /usr/sbin/aa-complain, line 30, in module - tool.cmd_complain()

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378095] Re: aa-complain traceback when marking multiple profiles

2015-04-06 Thread Seyeong Kim
@tyhicks got it Thanks :) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Assignee: Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1378095] Re: aa-complain traceback when marking multiple profiles

2015-04-07 Thread Seyeong Kim
@tyhicks quiestion :) you are planning to adopt you mentioned for multiple release? trusty, utopic etc.. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1378095

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014-8964

2015-07-06 Thread Seyeong Kim
=1546 Requires some heavy backporting to older releases, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166147#c2. ** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) ** Patch added

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014-8964

2015-07-06 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu Utopic) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) ** Patch added: utopic-cve-2014-8964.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4424961/+files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-23 Thread Seyeong Kim
@mdeslaur Nope. but I got an error in current trusty pkg without my patch you could also check current trusty pkg ### Test 2: API, errors, internals, and non-Perl stuff (not UTF-8) --- ./testdata/testoutput2 2012-06-02 02:53:58.0 +0900 +++ testtry 2015-07-24

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu Vivid) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu Vivid) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pcre3 in Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: utopic-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431959/+files/utopic-pcre3-cve-2014%2C2015.debdiff ** Patch added: utopic-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: trusty-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4432259/+files/trusty-pcre3-cve-2014%2C2015.debdiff ** Patch added: trusty-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: trusty-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4432259/+files/trusty-pcre3-cve-2014%2C2015.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: vivid-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4432263/+files/vivid-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pcre3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396768 Title: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015 Status in pcre3 package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in pcre3 source

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014-8964

2015-07-20 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) ** Changed in: pcre3 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) = (unassigned) ** Patch added: wily-cve-2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: wily-cve-2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431778/+files/wily-cve-2015.debdiff ** Patch added: wily-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: utopic-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431922/+files/utopic-pcre3-cve-2014%2C2015.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: vivid-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431921/+files/vivid-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: utopic-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431922/+files/utopic-pcre3-cve-2014%2C2015.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: utopic-pcre3-cve-2014,2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431959/+files/utopic-pcre3-cve-2014%2C2015.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1396768] Re: pcre3 vulnerability CVE-2014, 2015

2015-07-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: vivid-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/pcre3/+bug/1396768/+attachment/4431921/+files/vivid-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff ** Patch added: vivid-pcre3-cve-2015.debdiff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1321418] Re: fsck.ext4 fails to fix multiply-claimed blocks: can't find dup_blk

2015-08-30 Thread Seyeong Kim
= In Progress ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy) = (unassigned

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1321418] Re: fsck.ext4 fails to fix multiply-claimed blocks: can't find dup_blk

2015-08-30 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: trusty-fix-multiply-claimed.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1321418/+attachment/4454739/+files/trusty-fix-multiply-claimed.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-29 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "yakkety-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1569292/+attachment/4651215/+files/yakkety-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-29 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: [Impact] When trying to join AD domain via realm command, it hangs. after researching, packagekit got segfault. [Testcase] realm -v join int.domainname.com --user login  * Resolving: _ldap._tcp.int.domanname.com  * Performing LDAP DSE lookup on:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-29 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: "xenial-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1569292/+attachment/4649721/+files/xenial-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff ** Patch removed: "yakkety-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-29 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "yakkety-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1569292/+attachment/4651258/+files/yakkety-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-27 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + When trying to join AD domain via realm command, it hangs. + after researching, packagekit got segfault. + + [Testcase] + realm -v join int.domainname.com --user login - * Resolving: _ldap._tcp.int.domanname.com - * Performing LDAP DSE lookup on:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-27 Thread Seyeong Kim
need to be sponsored that can be combined 4 patches ** Patch added: "xenial-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1569292/+attachment/4649721/+files/xenial-check-null-in-aptintf-init.debdiff -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-26 Thread Seyeong Kim
@niklas-andersson Hello, It seems that https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/commit/e94b80f90179db18221b2eff93b4561b5418fbfb fixes this issue ( especially, code checking whether_proxy is null ) I uploaded ppa only for testing with this commit and dependent commits. Could you please test this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-24 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Package changed: realmd (Ubuntu) => packagekit (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569292 Title: Can't join to AD domain Status in realmd:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-05-19 Thread Seyeong Kim
It works for me ii packagekit0.8.17-4ubuntu6~gcc5.4ubuntu1.1 amd64 ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569292] Re: Can't join to AD domain

2016-04-28 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429427] Re: Unexplainable time jumps in CRON

2017-07-17 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + on Trusty + + logging to syslog via cron causes timestamp abnormals after several + hours. + + [Test Case] + + 1. run below first, + while true ; do logger "hello syslog" ; sleep 1; done + + 2. register below script to crontab + for i in {1..100} ; do

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429427] Re: Unexplainable time jumps in CRON

2017-07-17 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1429427_trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1429427/+attachment/4916080/+files/lp1429427_trusty.debdiff ** Description changed: [Impact] on Trusty logging to syslog via cron causes timestamp abnormals after several hours.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429427] Re: Unexplainable time jumps in CRON

2017-07-18 Thread Seyeong Kim
right, In my test, only 7a2e247 commit fixes this symptom. but I think be45099 is worth SRUing with 7a2e247 as commit's description 5a11a1d is quite far uploaded debdiff for two patches. Thanks ** Patch added: "lp1429427_trusty2.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1429427] Re: Unexplainable time jumps in CRON

2017-07-19 Thread Seyeong Kim
I tested -proposed pkg and this symptom is fixed with it. ii rsyslog 7.4.4-1ubuntu2.7 amd64.. Thanks. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1748147] Re: [SRU] debhelper support override from /etc/tmpfiles.d for systemd

2018-06-06 Thread Seyeong Kim
FYI systemd-tmpfiles command running when installing or upgrading systemd is in debhelper pkg cat autoscripts/postinst-init-tmpfiles if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ]; then # In case this system is running systemd, we need to ensure that all # necessary

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1748147] Re: [SRU] debhelper support override from /etc/tmpfiles.d for systemd

2018-06-06 Thread Seyeong Kim
@racb, adconrad Yes, exactly... As you can see debian bugs. In the beginning, I meant to fix it like that e.g running systemd-tmpfiles for all files in /var/lib/tmpfiles.d/ not just for systemd defined files, by running it without argument But the maintainer didn't accept mine, you can check

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-09 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_zesty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5033300/+files/lp1717714_zesty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-09 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5033299/+files/lp1717714_xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-09 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: "lp1717714_trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5032828/+files/lp1717714_trusty.debdiff ** Patch removed: "lp1717714_xenial.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-09 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_artful.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5033301/+files/lp1717714_artful.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-09 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5033302/+files/lp1717714_bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-08 Thread Seyeong Kim
tu17) I am aware this is a non-default configuration, but I think this should work. ** Tags removed: patch ** Tags added: sts-sru-needed ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-08 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_artful.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5032831/+files/lp1717714_artful.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-08 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5032829/+files/lp1717714_xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-08 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_zesty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5032830/+files/lp1717714_zesty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-08 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5032832/+files/lp1717714_bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-08 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1717714_trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1717714/+attachment/5032828/+files/lp1717714_trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-01-11 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: [Impact] If PID is larger than 6 digits. apparmor denies process. this fix is committed, but not released. so all supporting version are affected. [Test Case] 1. making pid over 6 digits - - i used touch command to do it - 2. snap install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-03 Thread Seyeong Kim
hmm, this has leak more than before.. testing.. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316970 Title: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd Status in glib2.0 package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-02 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1316970_trusty_pacemaker_v2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1316970/+attachment/5047782/+files/lp1316970_trusty_pacemaker_v2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-02 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello ddstreet Thanks for the review. I changed some code for pacemaker. ( char -> gchar for matching type, with g_free) and glib2.0 patch is needed in my test. without it, memory leak is there. 4kB leak every 10 second at least. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-02-02 Thread Seyeong Kim
Thanks Eric ii apparmor 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6~14.04.3 there is no pre-installed snapd on trusty so i needed to install snapd first 1. set sysctl 2. add -proposed 3. apt install snapd 4. reboot 5. snap install --dangerous oldverioncore symptom is gone Thanks. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch removed: "lp1316970_trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1316970/+attachment/5031302/+files/lp1316970_trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Attachment added: "valgrind-afterpatch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1316970/+attachment/5047145/+files/valgrind-afterpatch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1316970_trusty_glib2.0.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1316970/+attachment/5047147/+files/lp1316970_trusty_glib2.0.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Attachment added: "valgrind-beforepatch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1316970/+attachment/5047144/+files/valgrind-beforepatch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
se? ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seyeong Kim (xtrusia) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316970 Title: g_dbus

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1316970_trusty_pacemaker.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1316970/+attachment/5047146/+files/lp1316970_trusty_pacemaker.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello, I tested on artful ii apparmor 2.11.0-2ubuntu17.1 tested same steps as test case section. Thanks ** Tags removed: verification-needed-artful ** Tags added: verification-done-artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-02-01 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello, I tested on xenial ii apparmor 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.8 tested same steps as test case section. there is no DENIED after installing proposed pkg Thanks ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-02-02 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello on trusty apt-get download apparmor_2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6~14.04.2_amd64.ddb dpkg -x apparmor... t cat t/etc/apparmor.d/tunables/kernelvars @{pid}={[1-9],[1-9][0-9],[1-9][0-9][0-9],[1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9],[1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9],[1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]} which is old one. I checked

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-04 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1316970_trusty_pacemaker_v3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1316970/+attachment/5048947/+files/lp1316970_trusty_pacemaker_v3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-05 Thread Seyeong Kim
@ddstreet Could you please review V3 again? Thanks in advance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316970 Title: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-05 Thread Seyeong Kim
For V3. It seems that g_variant_unref(value); part is needed. Added it again and no memory leaks. in g_variant_lookup_value, it calls g_variant_get_child_value so as you said. it need to be unref value as well i think. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-02-07 Thread Seyeong Kim
sorry not commenting at once mvo: the almost-ready 2.31 release will fix this -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717714 Title: @{pid} variable broken on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1717714] Re: @{pid} variable broken on systems with pid_max more than 6 digits

2018-02-07 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello Eric I'm attaching mvo's PM mvo: yes, please ignore the failure of snapd. there was a server side change in the store that makes the autopkgtests fail -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-14 Thread Seyeong Kim
sure, no problem Thanks eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316970 Title: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu: New Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-14 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello Eric, ddstreet #1740892 seems starting to fix Could you guys can sponsor this issue as well? Thanks a lot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316970

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-20 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: [Impact] lrmd daemon with upstart resource has memory leak in Trusty affected to pacemaker 1.1.10. - affected to glib2.0 2.40.2-0ubuntu1 + affected to glib2.0 2.40.2-0ubuntu1 >> for glib2.0 created new lp [3] Please note that patch for pacemaker is created

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750741] Re: Memory leak in g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()

2018-02-20 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1750741_trusty_glib2.0.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1750741/+attachment/5059468/+files/lp1750741_trusty_glib2.0.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750741] [NEW] Memory leak in g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()

2018-02-20 Thread Seyeong Kim
Public bug reported: [Impact] This issue is found while debugging pacemaker lrmd memory leak glib2.0 gio function g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync has leak as [1] said this is affected to Trusty [Test Case] https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/fqK6Cx3SKK/ you can check memory leak with this script

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750741] Re: Memory leak in g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()

2018-02-22 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello ddstreet yep, it is tricky.. In the beginning, I added only one line but build failed. 3 commits for building, only one line is related to memroy leak directly. I retried it and attaching build link on lp Thanks

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1316970] Re: g_dbus memory leak in lrmd

2018-02-19 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello ddstreet I confirmed that glib2.0 patch is needed. I installed patched_pacemaker only on my system and running just 1 hour. it started with 4700(RES) but now it is 8000(RES). after installing glib2.0 it started with 4612, now is is 4688 Thanks [1] is script to reproduce this issue.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1751225] [NEW] apt update hangs when repository url is redirect url

2018-02-23 Thread Seyeong Kim
Public bug reported: [Impact] When using redirect url on /etc/apt/sources.list apt update command hangs this is affected with commit https://anonscm.debian.org/git/apt/apt.git/commit/?id=dd547ebaffd2aceb42e2908f1d5f0ab386af6cb1 In my test, moving below[1] code after[2] [1] ### if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750741] Re: Memory leak in g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()

2018-02-26 Thread Seyeong Kim
@ddstreet After analyzing code. I don't think this fix is possible without any big changes for trusty. and glib2.0 affects many pkgs it seems. it is quite dangerous to fix this with large commits. so lets focus on pacemaker instead of glib2.0 how about this ddstreet? Thanks -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1751225] Re: apt update hangs when repository url is redirect url

2018-03-08 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello, I verified this -proposed pkg is working. 1. upgrade apt pkg 2. insert above url in test case to sources.list 3. apt update 4. check if it hangs or not dpkg -l ii apt 1.2.26 amd64commandline package manager Thanks ** Tags removed:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1751225] Re: apt update hangs when repository url is redirect url

2018-03-06 Thread Seyeong Kim
Thanks a lot! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751225 Title: apt update hangs when repository url is redirect url Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1538284] Re: [SRU] Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated

2018-04-05 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1538284_xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1538284/+attachment/5103452/+files/lp1538284_xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1538284] Re: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated

2018-04-05 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + When installing postgresql, many warning msgs are raised + Please refer to Original Description + + [Test Case] + + 1. create ubuntu instance + 2. apt install postgresql + + + [Regression Potentials] + This change is quite small(just escaping), and it

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1538284] Re: [SRU] Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated

2018-04-09 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello, Thanks for your cooperation. Tested on Xenial 1. create xenial instance 2. add proposed repository 3. apt install libpam-runtime 4. apt install postgresql warnings are gone. Thanks! dpkg -l | grep pam ii libpam-modules:amd641.1.8-3.2ubuntu2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1538284] Re: [SRU] Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated

2018-04-09 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello, Tested on artful 1. create artful instance 2. add proposed repository 3. apt install libpam-runtime 4. apt install p ostgresql warnings are gone Thanks! dpkg -l | grep pam ii libpam-cap:amd641:2.25-1.1amd64 POSIX 1003.1e capabilities

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1538284] Re: [SRU] Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated

2018-04-06 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Artful) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seyeong

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1748147] Re: Upgrading systemd sets incorrect permissions on /var/log/

2018-04-22 Thread Seyeong Kim
** No longer affects: systemd (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748147 Title: Upgrading systemd sets

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1748147] Re: Upgrading systemd sets incorrect permissions on /var/log/

2018-03-31 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #894510 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894510 ** Also affects: systemd via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894510 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Project changed: systemd => debhelper ** Also

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1751225] Re: apt update hangs when repository url is redirect url

2018-03-05 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello Julian, no news for this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751225 Title: apt update hangs when repository url is redirect url Status in apt package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794478] Re: Automatic ipv4 not assigned to bond interface is manual ipv6 is assigned to it

2020-03-03 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello I've verified this -proposed pkg on my local. #2 on description working fine. xtrusia@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -l | grep network-manager ii network-manager1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4 amd64network management framework (daemon and userspace

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794478] Re: Automatic ipv4 not assigned to bond interface is manual ipv6 is assigned to it

2020-02-18 Thread Seyeong Kim
I uploaded patch for bionic sru. but I didn't subscribe sru-sponsors yet because I'm still confirming reproducer. I'll update description after reproducing this issue in my local. Thanks. ** Tags added: sts ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seye

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794478] Re: Automatic ipv4 not assigned to bond interface is manual ipv6 is assigned to it

2020-02-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
why bugproxy keep attaching old debdiff I've changed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794478 Title: Automatic ipv4 not assigned to bond interface

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794478] Re: Automatic ipv4 not assigned to bond interface is manual ipv6 is assigned to it

2020-02-21 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: [Impact] + + In case creating bond interface, IPv4 address is not automatically + assigned when IPv6 has manual setting. + [Test Case] + + 1. create 18.04.4 instance, network-manager version is 1.10.6-2ubuntu.1.2 as original description. + 2. ipv6 manual, ipv4 auto

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1794478] Re: Automatic ipv4 not assigned to bond interface is manual ipv6 is assigned to it

2020-02-19 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: "lp1794478_bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1794478/+attachment/5329464/+files/lp1794478_bionic.debdiff ** Patch added: "lp1794478_bionic.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1733321] Re: network-manager ADT tests fail with on ppc64el with artful/linux 4.13.0.17.18

2020-04-20 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: [Impact] The killswitches-no-urfkill autopkgtest fails sometimes because nmcli reports the old state when it's called right after rfkill block/unblock. Adding a sleep before calling nmcli fixes the issue. ppc64el ADT log from failed testcase:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1733321] Re: network-manager ADT tests fail with on ppc64el with artful/linux 4.13.0.17.18

2020-04-03 Thread Seyeong Kim
Hello, I uploaded pkg to ppa https://launchpad.net/~xtrusia/+archive/ubuntu/lp1733321 and checked ppc64el build and testing. It worked fine without any issue. Could you please adjust Kleber's debdiff as well? Thanks a lot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1733321] Re: network-manager ADT tests fail with on ppc64el with artful/linux 4.13.0.17.18

2020-04-23 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Description changed: [Impact] The killswitches-no-urfkill autopkgtest fails sometimes because nmcli reports the old state when it's called right after rfkill block/unblock. Adding a sleep before calling nmcli fixes the issue. ppc64el ADT log from failed testcase:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-23 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch added: "lp1886300_groovy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1886300/+attachment/5395090/+files/lp1886300_groovy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-23 Thread Seyeong Kim
** Patch removed: "lp1886300_groovy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1886300/+attachment/5394575/+files/lp1886300_groovy.debdiff ** Patch removed: "lp1886300_focal.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886300] Re: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve (regression)

2020-07-23 Thread Seyeong Kim
@mfo Thanks for your advice, re-uploaded patches -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886300 Title: rename.ul refuses to rename links that don't resolve

  1   2   >