[Touch-packages] [Bug 1120526] Re: dbus session file contains wrong DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS

2015-01-24 Thread flux242
almost 2 years later still have the problem: $ (env; cat ~/.dbus/session-bus/$(cat /var/lib/dbus/machine-id)-0 )|awk -F',' '/^DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS/ {print $1}' DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-jYz33365w2 DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-Xjd2ntrMtE two lines

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1407400] [NEW] WLAN interface throughput drops thanks to NetworkManager

2015-01-04 Thread flux242
Public bug reported: Here I have a pic of the wifi periodic drops http://i.imgur.com/JhRVP8F.png. Server is connected to the router per LAN. I'm connecting to the server through the router's WLAN. Bytes are transferred in one direction using nc. The graph at the top is the CPU load on the router,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522922]

2015-12-17 Thread flux242
(In reply to Mika Kahola from comment #54) > These patches apply to drm-intel-nightly kernel which is a development tree > for i915 driver. You can clone the git repository from > > https://01.org/linuxgraphics/documentation/development/source-code > > and apply these patches on top of it. I'm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522922]

2015-12-26 Thread flux242
patch https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/66697/ DOESN'T solve the flickering problem on my computer. What I did: 1. installed generic kernel and headers from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/drm-intel-nightly/2015-12-24-wily/ 2. get the sources from the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522922]

2016-01-08 Thread flux242
> think Mika is on the right track, having solved the initial problem > (persistent flickering) by modifying the eDP link training. The remaining > problem is that the flickering recurs when the display resumes from sleep. in my case flickering occur just after reboot (and this is not the same

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522922]

2016-01-08 Thread flux242
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/69394/ > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/69395/ > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/69396/ > > flux242 seems to have a clock recovery issue. This fix may provide a > solution for that as well. three patches above

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1650848] [NEW] Move evolution specific deps out of the bluez-obex

2016-12-17 Thread flux242
Public bug reported: I do not have eveolution installed so why do I have evolution-data- server-common and libedataserver-1.2-22 installed on my system? the package to fix is bluez-obexd I'm on Ubuntu 16.10 ** Affects: bluez (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1685193] [NEW] [17.04] systemd-udevd. Scripts started by a rule won't write to /var/log

2017-04-21 Thread flux242
Public bug reported: this is rather weird problem but after upgrading to the 17.04 the pm- powersave script I start by a udev rule stopped working. After debuggin a bit I found a place that causes the error. In the /usr/lib/pm-utils /pm-functions there's the init_logfile function that called exec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1685193] Re: [17.04] systemd-udevd. Scripts started by a rule won't write to /var/log

2017-05-05 Thread flux242
what are the intentions? systemd power management huh? Which of these problems has already been solved since 15.10 then: 1. System doesn't react on the power supply plugged/unplugged events 2. Lid close events are handled by the systemd by default and not by the xfce4-power-manager 3. System

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624317] Re: systemd-resolved breaks VPN with split-horizon DNS

2017-12-29 Thread flux242
I'm not sure if setting negative priority really solves the dns leaks problem because I'm on 17.10 and I do have dns leaks. If I'm connected to my ISP over a LTE network and the connection is unstable then it could happen that DNS queries will be sent over my ISP network and not over my VPN

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872286] Re: gio - cifs mount smb not possible "Location is not mountable"

2020-05-08 Thread flux242
I dream of a world where after next lts upgrade my samba shares are still mountable! This isn't the first time, you know -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905775] Re: Uninstalling python3-apporrt should not uninstall xorg packages

2020-12-01 Thread flux242
no, it is an issue because packages are marked for automatic removal: x11-apps x11-session-utils xinit xinput xserver-common xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-all xserver-xorg-input-libinput So you suggest to install all those packages extra afterwards instead of simply getting dependencies

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905775] Re: Uninstalling python3-apporrt should not uninstall xorg packages

2020-12-01 Thread flux242
i've just checked debian xorg package dependencies and no it doesn't depend on that problem reporting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905775 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905775] Re: Uninstalling python3-apporrt should not uninstall xorg packages

2020-12-01 Thread flux242
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1899971 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899971 well, based on the reply from Timo Aaltonen it seems like there's canonical politics involved so, i purged python3-apport and reinstalled only 2 packages: sudo apt install xserver-xorg-core

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905775] Re: Uninstalling python3-apporrt should not uninstall xorg packages

2020-12-01 Thread flux242
ah, it's the other way around with dependencies. So, apparently xorg should not depend on problem reporting. I think the only reason they put this dependency there is because otherwise they would have to add it to every -desktop task. And no, I want to purge all packages related to apport, not