[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2017-12-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Is the current situation good enough? In the procps package, the default is still "2". Image deployments change that as Scott described in comment #23 (but that was 3y ago, might have changed). I don't know how server installs using the text mode installer behave, it's been a while since I last

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2017-06-09 Thread Tore Anderson
Hi Christian. Some comments/corrections: 1) On servers privacy extensions are *not* always enabled. As I pointed out in comment #24, if NM is not in use, privacy extensions are only enabled for userspace-created interfaces such as "vlan123". It is *not* enabled by default for physical interfaces

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2017-06-08 Thread ChristianEhrhardt
Thanks Tore for checking so much Details and all the relations to NetworkManager it might have on a Desktop. On a server (no NM) I'd think it is always enabled i'd think. But if that is a bug or not is a"discussion". Just as much as users want it off (here) others want it on - see bug 176125 and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2016-04-24 Thread Tore Anderson
In case anyone's interested in knowing why setting net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr=2 no longer changes the value of pre- existing interfaces (thus ensuring privacy extensions are disabled by default for physical interfaces configured through /etc/network/interfaces), it's because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2016-04-23 Thread Tore Anderson
Correction to my previous comment: "disable_ipv6" should of course have read "use_tempaddr" throughout, except for the part about NM bouncing the disable_ipv6 sysctl. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2016-04-23 Thread Tore Anderson
The situation appears to have improved somewhat in Xenial. The net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6 sysctl appears to have become a no-op in recent kernels, so when 10-ipv6-privacy.conf gets applied during the bootup sequence (by systemd-sysctl.service) it does *not* change the effective per-device

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2015-12-25 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068756 Title: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default Status in cloud-init

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2014-10-10 Thread Scott Moser
ok. so some updates. Ben fixed this in the cloud image build process via [1] (commit [2]), and limited the change to utopic+. The fix was done by adding a file /etc/sysctl.d/99-cloudimg-ipv6.conf The problem with this change is described in bug 1352255 and bug 994931. If ipv6 addresses are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2014-10-09 Thread Scott Moser
interestingly enough, modifying the privacy settings via sysctl has some negative affects if addresses are already up. see diagnosis in bug 1377005 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2014-09-06 Thread Mr. Jester
Just to document additional support. I concur that on a Server install, PE should disabled by default. A server doesn't fall into the use case of needing to protect the privacy of the user. It is meant to be known, not obfuscated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1068756] Re: IPv6 Privacy Extensions enabled on Ubuntu Server by default

2014-08-27 Thread Scott Moser
marked this 'triaged' in cloud-init while still not really relevant. Ben Howard has disabled the privacy extensions in cloud images in 14.10, and the plan is to just do the same for 14.04. ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)