[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2017-01-30 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Tags added: atom -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580792 Title: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
The log seems to indicate that you're experiencing this Atom bug, so here is the right place... i915_program_error: Exceeded max ALU instructions (76 out of 64) Although the log also shows you're experiencing general Intel bug 1583949 too. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-18 Thread Guillaume F
Here is my unity8.log with INTEL_DEBUG=perf. It's quite obscure for me as I'm not a developer, but I did find the problems you mentioned it your comments. I'll let you check! ** Attachment added: "unity8.log"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-18 Thread Daniel van Vugt
The original bug description is a bit vague here. In comment #3 I was aiming to make this bug very definite. If you add INTEL_DEBUG=perf then you will see the errors I mentioned. I think this bug should be about those errors in comment #3 since the bug description is a bit too vague. Please add

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-18 Thread Guillaume F
Did a few tests, dialogs with a black/transparent backgrounds are definitely the worst (Terminal password prompt, shut down dialog, set a code or password in System Settings, connect to a hidden wifi network). The dialog can take up to 20s to fully open. Even then, they remain slow, for example

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-18 Thread Andrea Bernabei
well, if it is a dialog-specific problem it could be worth having a separate bug, that only tackles dialog. otherwise you end up fixing too many things as part of the same bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-18 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Please keep the discussion in this bug and don't log a new one. Just add an ubuntu-ui-toolkit task here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580792 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-18 Thread Andrea Bernabei
@Guillame: that is interesting, it might be useful to see if that happens for all dialogs like that (there should be a few in system settings app). If it does, it's probably worth reporting a bug against ubuntu-ui-toolkit to investigate that -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-10-18 Thread Guillaume F
Hi, I don't know if this is useful, but on my netbook the worst performance comes from black and transparent overlays, like when the Terminal asks for a password or when you want to turn off your computer. In those cases the frame time is more than 1s, sometimes 2s. I have to hard reboot every

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1580792] Re: Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do)

2016-09-27 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Summary changed: - Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly + Unity8 on Intel Atoms performs poorly (falls back to software rendering more than non-Atoms do) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity8 in Ubuntu.