[Touch-packages] [Bug 1704422] Re: systemd-resolved keeps swapping DNS servers and breaking name resolution

2017-07-21 Thread Jordi Miralles
Found out it's related to some  occasional packet loss. Why this
happens, I'm not sure, but appears to be more related to the wireless
kernel mod than systemd in this case.

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1704422

Title:
  systemd-resolved keeps swapping DNS servers and breaking name
  resolution

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hi,

  I think the name is self explanatory, let me paste some logs of what
  does my syslog look like at any given time:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/25089356/

  
  Jul 14 16:49:23 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using system hostname 'Tuxedo'.
  Jul 14 16:49:52 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.8.8.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::8844.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.8.8.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using degraded feature set 
(UDP+EDNS0+DO) for DNS server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::.
  Jul 14 16:50:19 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::8844.

  (...)

  
  Jul 14 16:50:43 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using degraded feature set 
(UDP+EDNS0+DO) for DNS server 78.46.223.24.
  Jul 14 16:50:43 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:44 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:45 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:48 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:48 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:49 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:50 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:50 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.

  This happens both over the VPN and without (only than without the VPN
  I don't get the log messages, just a huge packet loss):

  tux@Tuxedo:~$ ping google.es
  ^T192PING google.es (216.58.201.131) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 
time=26.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 
time=19.5 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 
time=24.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 
time=22.3 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=14 ttl=55 
time=20.5 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=20 ttl=55 
time=20.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=22 ttl=55 
time=26.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=24 ttl=55 
time=29.2 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=25 ttl=55 
time=20.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=26 ttl=55 
time=22.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=27 ttl=55 
time=21.0 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=28 ttl=55 
time=30.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=29 ttl=55 
time=23.2 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=30 ttl=55 
time=29.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=37 ttl=55 
time=30.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=40 ttl=55 
time=24.8 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=43 ttl=55 
time=23.3 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=45 ttl=55 
time=22.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=46 ttl=55 
time=21.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=53 ttl=55 
time=23.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=61 ttl=55 
time=21.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=62 ttl=55 
time=19.3 ms
  ^C
  --- google.es ping 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1704422] Re: systemd-resolved keeps swapping DNS servers and breaking name resolution

2017-07-16 Thread Jordi Miralles
Hi,

The release is Ubuntu 17.10

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1704422

Title:
  systemd-resolved keeps swapping DNS servers and breaking name
  resolution

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,

  I think the name is self explanatory, let me paste some logs of what
  does my syslog look like at any given time:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/25089356/

  
  Jul 14 16:49:23 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using system hostname 'Tuxedo'.
  Jul 14 16:49:52 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.8.8.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::8844.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.8.8.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using degraded feature set 
(UDP+EDNS0+DO) for DNS server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::.
  Jul 14 16:50:19 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::8844.

  (...)

  
  Jul 14 16:50:43 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using degraded feature set 
(UDP+EDNS0+DO) for DNS server 78.46.223.24.
  Jul 14 16:50:43 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:44 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:45 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:48 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:48 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:49 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:50 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:50 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.

  This happens both over the VPN and without (only than without the VPN
  I don't get the log messages, just a huge packet loss):

  tux@Tuxedo:~$ ping google.es
  ^T192PING google.es (216.58.201.131) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 
time=26.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 
time=19.5 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 
time=24.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 
time=22.3 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=14 ttl=55 
time=20.5 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=20 ttl=55 
time=20.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=22 ttl=55 
time=26.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=24 ttl=55 
time=29.2 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=25 ttl=55 
time=20.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=26 ttl=55 
time=22.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=27 ttl=55 
time=21.0 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=28 ttl=55 
time=30.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=29 ttl=55 
time=23.2 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=30 ttl=55 
time=29.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=37 ttl=55 
time=30.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=40 ttl=55 
time=24.8 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=43 ttl=55 
time=23.3 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=45 ttl=55 
time=22.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=46 ttl=55 
time=21.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=53 ttl=55 
time=23.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=61 ttl=55 
time=21.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=62 ttl=55 
time=19.3 ms
  ^C
  --- google.es ping statistics ---
  62 packets transmitted, 22 received, 64% packet loss, time 61869ms
  rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.394/23.851/30.417/3.404 ms

  
  Let me know if I can provide any other details.

To manage 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1704422] Re: systemd-resolved keeps swapping DNS servers and breaking name resolution

2017-07-14 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: unknown-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1704422

Title:
  systemd-resolved keeps swapping DNS servers and breaking name
  resolution

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,

  I think the name is self explanatory, let me paste some logs of what
  does my syslog look like at any given time:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/25089356/

  
  Jul 14 16:49:23 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using system hostname 'Tuxedo'.
  Jul 14 16:49:52 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.8.8.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::.
  Jul 14 16:50:17 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::8844.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.8.8.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using degraded feature set 
(UDP+EDNS0+DO) for DNS server 8.8.4.4.
  Jul 14 16:50:18 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::.
  Jul 14 16:50:19 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to fallback DNS 
server 2001:4860:4860::8844.

  (...)

  
  Jul 14 16:50:43 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Using degraded feature set 
(UDP+EDNS0+DO) for DNS server 78.46.223.24.
  Jul 14 16:50:43 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:44 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:45 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:48 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:48 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:49 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:50 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
162.242.211.137 for interface tun0.
  Jul 14 16:50:50 Tuxedo systemd-resolved[1120]: Switching to DNS server 
78.46.223.24 for interface tun0.

  This happens both over the VPN and without (only than without the VPN
  I don't get the log messages, just a huge packet loss):

  tux@Tuxedo:~$ ping google.es
  ^T192PING google.es (216.58.201.131) 56(84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 
time=26.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 
time=19.5 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 
time=24.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 
time=22.3 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=14 ttl=55 
time=20.5 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=20 ttl=55 
time=20.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=22 ttl=55 
time=26.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=24 ttl=55 
time=29.2 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=25 ttl=55 
time=20.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=26 ttl=55 
time=22.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=27 ttl=55 
time=21.0 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=28 ttl=55 
time=30.4 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=29 ttl=55 
time=23.2 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=30 ttl=55 
time=29.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=37 ttl=55 
time=30.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=40 ttl=55 
time=24.8 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=43 ttl=55 
time=23.3 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=45 ttl=55 
time=22.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=46 ttl=55 
time=21.9 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=53 ttl=55 
time=23.7 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=61 ttl=55 
time=21.1 ms
  64 bytes from mad06s25-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.201.131): icmp_seq=62 ttl=55 
time=19.3 ms
  ^C
  --- google.es ping statistics ---
  62 packets transmitted, 22 received, 64% packet loss, time 61869ms
  rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.394/23.851/30.417/3.404 ms

  
  Let me know if I can provide any other details.

To manage