[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
** Changed in: libxml2
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2:
Fix Released
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
This bug was fixed in the package libxml2 - 2.9.10+dfsg-5
---
libxml2 (2.9.10+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
[ Mattia Rizzolo ]
* d/rules:
+ Drop --disable-silent-rules, already passed by dh_auto_configure.
+ Drop --parallel, now default with debhelper compat > 10.
+ Use dh_installdocs and dh_installexamples to install docs and examples.
+ Use dh_missing --fail-missing (and add the relevant d/not-installed).
+ Minimize indep build to build only the docs.
* d/watch: fix an option to avoid a warning message.
* d/control:
+ Move most of the build-deps to Build-Depends-Arch.
+ Use ${python:Depends} also for python-libxml2-dbg.
* Add a lintian override for
debian-rules-uses-supported-python-versions-without-python-all-build-depends
[ Gunnar Hjalmarsson ]
* d/p/python3-unicode-errors.patch:
Fix segfault issue with itstool and py3. LP: #1869814
-- Mattia Rizzolo Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:53:23 +0200
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
sync'd. please close this bug once libxml2 has been accepted
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
** Changed in: libxml2
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues #64
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues/64
** Changed in: libxml2
Remote watch: bugzilla.gnome.org/ #789714 =>
gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues #64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2:
Unknown
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
** Also affects: libxml2 via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789714
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch removed: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues #64
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues/64
** Bug watch removed: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues #12
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/12
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2:
Unknown
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
** No longer affects: itstool (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxml2/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
To the sponsor:
libxml2 2.9.10+dfsg-5, including the patch, is now available in Debian
unstable. So please sync libxml2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
@Sebastien: Indeed, it's the very same thing. Then I spent several hours
on an issue that was already spotted and fixed. :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
@Gunnar, looks like the patch I backported earlier in the cycle
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxml2/2.9.4+dfsg1-8ubuntu3
But apparently doko synced from Debian overlooking we had a delta...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-docs - 20.04.1
---
ubuntu-docs (20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium
* scripts/update-translations.sh:
- Handle tarballs also from the package
* Bump version to 20.04 / focal
* debian/control.in, debian/control:
- Replace Vcs-Bzr with Vcs-Git
- Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0
* New languages: af, ckb
* Translations from Launchpad:
- Syntactically incorrect Chinese translations of two strings were
corrected before this translation update, which works around the
focal build failure as described in LP: #1869814.
-- Gunnar Hjalmarsson Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:11:00
+0200
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
** Tags added: ftbfs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Thanks Shaun! It's indeed that bug. Why am I not surprised when seeing
that you filed it? :)
I grabbed a Fedora patch and submitted a Debian merge request:
https://salsa.debian.org/xml-sgml-team/libxml2/-/merge_requests/3
It looks pretty spot on, don't you think? At least, with that patch
applied I can build ubuntu-docs 19.10.2 successfully again. A syntax
error in one of the Chinese translations is reported as warnings as
expected.
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
So in general, syntax errors in translations just cause a warning, and
the original text is used. itstool only errors on syntax if you pass
--strict, and yelp.m4 doesn't even give you a way to pass --strict.
There's a chance this is itstool's fault. You do still have to do memory
management with libxml2's Python bindings, so stuff like double frees in
application code is possible. But since this crash happens during error
reporting for a language with many-byte UTF-8 chars, and since it
weirdly only happens with Python 3, I suspect it's this libxml2 bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789714
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.gnome.org/ #789714
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789714
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Thanks Sebastien!
Or https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues/64 (which is not yet
closed).
@Boyuan: Well, it does scream loudly in the sense that the build fails.
I wouldn't blame the build system in this case. It has worked in a
sensible and robust way for many years. The segfault issue only happens
with python3-libxml2, not with python-libxml2. And I have the impression
(not yet confirmed) that the segfault only happens for XML syntax errors
in Chinese translations; for similar errors in non-Chinese translations
it only prints a warning and moves on (which is the desired behavior).
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues #64
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/issues/64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
@Gunnar It seems that the root cause has been found, thanks! It's well
known that translation could be fragile when the build system is not
well defined; all I can think of is to make the build system robust
enough and yell out loudly enough whenever an error (e.g., segfault)
happens.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
It's segfault in libxml code, their binding doesn't seem to handle
invalid files well, somewaht similar to
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/12
** Changed in: itstool (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues #12
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/12
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Uploaded a new version of ubuntu-docs, which builds on focal despite the
issue discussed in this bug report.
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)
** Tags added: focal regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
@Shaun: Have you possibly stumbled into anything similar when building
e.g. gnome-user-docs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Hmm.. I saw in the buildlog from the successful build that it skipped
the Chinese translation of a particular string. The reason proved to be
a missing '<' character, i.e. the translated string contains an instance
of '/em>' instead of ''. And that's the correct behavior; it should
check the Mallard syntax and skip translations with invalid syntax.
Anyway, I added the missing '<', and then ubuntu-docs built with the
itstool version in focal.
So the direct reason for the build failure is a syntactically incorrect
translation. OTOH, translators make mistakes, and a bad translation
*should not* make the whole package build to fail.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869814] Re: ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
@Boyuan: Do you have any thoughts on the above?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869814
Title:
ubuntu-docs build failure - possible solution
Status in itstool package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in ubuntu-docs package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
ubuntu-docs failed to build during the second Focal Fossa test
rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20200327-focal/+build/18982738
It was itstool which failed to generate the localized zh_CN pages. If
dropping zh_CN from ubuntu-help/Makefile.am, ubuntu-docs builds. But
excluding the Chinese pages is apparently not an acceptable solution.
The itstool package in focal {build-,}depends on python3. I built
itstool in a PPA with python2 instead, and in that PPA ubuntu-docs
built fine without modifications:
https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-docs/+packages
So the root cause seems to lie neither in ubuntu-docs nor itstool. I
would suspect that python3-libxml2 is buggy, but since itstool was
built against python2 in eoan, it's hard to tell if it's a regression.
Would building itstool against python2 be an acceptable workaround in
focal?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/itstool/+bug/1869814/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
