This bug was fixed in the package glibc - 2.35-0ubuntu3.3
---
glibc (2.35-0ubuntu3.3) jammy; urgency=medium
* Drop SVE patches due to kernal-related performance regression
* Fix the armhf stripping exception for ld.so (LP: #1927192)
glibc (2.35-0ubuntu3.2) jammy; urgency=medium
This has been re-broken in the glibc package when upstream changed the
name of the actual ld.so binary, thus escaping the stripping exception.
I've fixed this in the git tree in preparation of the mantic upload.
There's currently a Jammy SRU in -proposed, I won't supersede it for
this fix since
Although this has been fixed for focal (20.04), it looks like the fix
wasn't applied to jammy (22.04). So we're still stripping symbols off of
ld.so for armhf.
Maybe I should open a new ticket to track this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Changed in: gdb
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
Status in
This bug was fixed in the package glibc - 2.31-0ubuntu9.9
---
glibc (2.31-0ubuntu9.9) focal; urgency=medium
* Disable testsuite on riscv64. It is failing maths tests intermittently in
ways that cannot be a glibc regression and is disabled in later series
anyway.
glibc
Verified:
root@146e5ef6a792:/# dpkg -l libc6
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Architecture Description
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.5
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
This bug was fixed in the package gdb - 9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
---
gdb (9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1) focal; urgency=medium
* Re-enable running the tests on armhf, build-depend / depend on libc6-dbg
on armhf. (LP: #1927192)
-- Brian Murray Tue, 07 Dec 2021 15:49:12 -0800
** Changed
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
The gdb autopkgtest test failures listed in comment #24 are actually not
regressions as the test result is "neutral" and they quit early due to
not having machine-level isolation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
The version of gdb in focal-proposed built fine with the tests enabled
and the timeouts in the buildlog were not an issue.
[ 3:25PM 11723 ] [ bdmurray@impulse:/tmp ]
$ cat buildlog_ubuntu-focal-armhf.gdb_9.2-0ubuntu1\~20.04.1_BUILDING.txt |
fgrep '(timeout)'|wc -l
The gdb upload looks fine; I presume it wants to be marked block-
proposed, though?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf,
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gdb into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: Opinion => Won't Fix
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: Opinion => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Sorry, I see this is explained in another changelog entry / bug.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
Why was dh_strip previously being called with an override of
DH_COMPAT=8, and why is this safe to drop in SRU as part of this change?
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Opinion => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
This bug was fixed in the package glibc - 2.33-0ubuntu9
---
glibc (2.33-0ubuntu9) impish; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/git-updates.diff: update from upstream stable branch
- CVE-2021-33574: The mq_notify function has a potential use-after-free
issue when using a
IMO the change should be reverted later in Impish as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
Status in
@doko Not stripping ld.so on Focal came with an increase of ld.so from
110K to 1.3M. I don't think this is an acceptable increase when pulling
in libc6-dbg also fixes the problem.
See the test package here: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
service/+archive/ubuntu/4570
** Description changed:
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * Gdb can't set some breakpoints in ld.so on armhf when libc6-dbg is not
+ installed.
+
+ [Test Plan]
+
+ * Check that ld.so is not stripped on armhf:
+
+ * Check that ld.so is stripped on amd64:
+
+ $ file /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.31.so
+
@doko since the problem is arm-specific I don't want to deviate from the
default stripping on architectures where it is not necessary. Not that
the 28k would be so huge, but for the sake of not changing what was
already good.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
On 5/31/21 8:03 PM, Balint Reczey wrote:
> @doko would it be enough keep ld-* unstripped on armhf and armel only?
sure, that would fix the immediate issue. but is there a reason why you don't
want to have this across all architectures, or is this meant just for the
backports?
--
You received
@doko would it be enough keep ld-* unstripped on armhf and armel only?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
Status in gdb:
Incomplete
Status in gdb package
No, you would need to provide symlinks for all variants, for the real
file and all the symlinks.
The unstripped ld.so is 220k, the stripped one 192k. So these 28k look
pretty marginal to add, and I wouldn't see this a regression in size.
Attaching the diff that already is in the glibc in impish.
@doko Would fixing the symlink as suggested in LP: #1918035 help instead
of not stripping ld-*?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on
see also
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-May/126011.html
so not stripping ld.so
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on
This bug was fixed in the package gdb - 10.2-0ubuntu4
---
gdb (10.2-0ubuntu4) impish; urgency=medium
* Build-depend / depend on libc6-dbg on armhf. LP: #1927192.
-- Matthias Klose Fri, 07 May 2021 15:39:43 +0200
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Fix Committed
** Tags removed: rls-ff-incoming rls-gg-incoming rls-hh-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
Status
It's ok to strip glibc/ld.so on armhf, but then gdb needs to be able to
find the debug symbols.
For impish,
- call dh_strip in glibc with current debhelper, not compat 8,
so that the build-id's are resolved by build file system
layout, not the original file names. That's already done in
** Changed in: gdb
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
Status in gdb:
** Also affects: gdb (Ubuntu Impish)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Tags removed: rls-ii-incoming
** Tags added: fr-1346
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
Launchpad has imported 2 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27826.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #27826
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27826
** Also affects: gdb via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27826
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
37 matches
Mail list logo
