[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
This bug was fixed in the package flac - 1.4.2+ds-2ubuntu1 --- flac (1.4.2+ds-2ubuntu1) lunar; urgency=medium * Do not build and install manpages on i386. Build dep pandoc is not available in Ubuntu for i386. (LP: #1997533) - debian/control: + Exclude pandoc build dep on i386. + Add dh-exec build dep. - debian/flac.install + Make executable and add '#!/usr/bin/dh-exec'. + Exclude installing manpages on i386. -- Rik Mills Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:56:12 + ** Changed in: flac (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
** Changed in: flac (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rik Mills (rikmills) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
sponsored and unsubscribing sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
diff -Nru flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog --- flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog 2022-11-11 09:10:23.0 +0100 +++ flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/changelog 2022-11-24 19:56:12.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +flac (1.4.2+ds-2ubuntu1) lunar; urgency=medium + + * Do not build and install manpages on i386. Build dep pandoc is +not available in Ubuntu for i386. (LP: #1997533) +- debian/control: + + Exclude pandoc build dep on i386. + + Add dh-exec build dep. +- debian/flac.install + + Make executable and add '#!/usr/bin/dh-exec'. + + Exclude installing manpages on i386. + + -- Rik Mills Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:56:12 + + flac (1.4.2+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Fabian Greffrath ] diff -Nru flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/control flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/control --- flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/control2022-10-26 07:37:11.0 +0200 +++ flac-1.4.2+ds/debian/control2022-11-24 19:56:12.0 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ Source: flac Section: sound Priority: optional -Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers +Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers +XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Uploaders: Joshua Kwan , Fabian Greffrath , @@ -9,8 +10,9 @@ doxygen, Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), + dh-exec, libogg-dev, - pandoc, + pandoc [!i386], Standards-Version: 4.6.1 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/flac.git Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/flac this is the diff ** Changed in: flac (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
On 24/11/2022 08:36, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > It's not likely that we can build pandoc on i386, it would require > starting building the haskell stack there, someone probably needs to > patch flac to not build with pandoc on i386 In that case as possible solution would be: https://launchpad.net/~rikmills/+archive/ubuntu/bug1997533/+sourcepub/14167146/+listing-archive-extra Sorry for no debdiff, but that does not preserve making the install file executable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
** Changed in: flac (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: flac (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997533] Re: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep
It's not likely that we can build pandoc on i386, it would require starting building the haskell stack there, someone probably needs to patch flac to not build with pandoc on i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to flac in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997533 Title: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep Status in flac package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: flac 1.4.2+ds-2 in lunar proposed does not build on i386 - missing pandoc build dep which is not built in Ubuntu for i386 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/1.4.2+ds-2/+build/24644410 Change made in flac (1.4.1-1) "Replace docbook-to-man with pandoc as B-D" This prevents migration of flac (if/once tests succeed), and will block migration of packages that now build in proposed and depend on the bumped libs in flac 1.4 (libflac++10 and libflac12) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#flac e.g.amongst several others so far https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/update_excuses.html#kwave To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flac/+bug/1997533/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
