On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Isaac wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:15:14AM +0900, Ashwini Sharma wrote:
> > HI Rob & list,
> >
> > Attached is the patch for _route_ command. It does display, add and del
> > functions for routing tables.
> > Have a look at it.
> >
> > regards,
> > Ashwin
> > >// If lseek() doesn't work on this stream, return now.
> > > - if (pos<0) return 0;
> > > + if (pos == -1) return 0;
> >
> > And yet you compare it with a negative. Maybe the bit patterns work
> > out, but I'm uncomfortable with that. I can see a compiler optimizing
> > this out sim
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:15:14AM +0900, Ashwini Sharma wrote:
> HI Rob & list,
>
> Attached is the patch for _route_ command. It does display, add and del
> functions for routing tables.
> Have a look at it.
>
> regards,
> Ashwini Kumar
OK, I took a quick look through it.
First, thanks for d
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 03:00:50 AM, Ashwini Sharma wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Attached is the patch for _fsck_ toy.
>>
>> This will parse _/etc/fstab_ for devices and their properties and then
>> does
>> a _fork_ _exec_ for the
>> fsck. tool.
>>
>
> I'm
Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/31/2013 05:53:09 AM, Felix Janda wrote:
> > This should now hopefully fix the earlier segfaults.
> >
> > In the case that lseek doesn't work and we count from the end
> > the algorithms for tail -n and tail -c are now more separate.
> > (tail -c is now more efficient sin
On 09/03/2013 03:00:50 AM, Ashwini Sharma wrote:
Hi Rob,
Attached is the patch for _fsck_ toy.
This will parse _/etc/fstab_ for devices and their properties and
then does
a _fork_ _exec_ for the
fsck. tool.
I'm in the process of adding the /etc/fstab parsing code for umount
(for user mou
