Re: [Toybox] Fwd: build help please with toybox

2019-11-24 Thread dmccunney
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 3:29 PM scsijon wrote: > > It'd be nice if a modern https://ellcc.org happened. :( > > this site is bringing alarms up in firefox, Potential Security Risk> > > Websites prove their identity via certificates, which are valid for a > set time period. The certificate for ellc

Re: [Toybox] Fwd: build help please with toybox

2019-11-24 Thread scsijon
On 25/11/19 00:47, Rob Landley wrote: On 11/23/19 9:03 PM, scsijon wrote: On 24/11/19 03:45, Rob Landley wrote: On 11/22/19 7:22 PM, scsijon wrote: On 23/11/19 09:56, scsijon wrote: thanks for the help On 23/11/19 09:18, Denys Nykula wrote: scripts/kconfig/lex.zconf.c:890:16: error: ‘EI

Re: [Toybox] Fwd: build help please with toybox

2019-11-24 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/23/19 9:03 PM, scsijon wrote: > On 24/11/19 03:45, Rob Landley wrote: >> On 11/22/19 7:22 PM, scsijon wrote: >>> On 23/11/19 09:56, scsijon wrote: thanks for the help On 23/11/19 09:18, Denys Nykula wrote: >> scripts/kconfig/lex.zconf.c:890:16: error: ‘EINTR’ undeclared (

Re: [Toybox] Fwd: build help please with toybox

2019-11-24 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/23/19 2:55 PM, scsijon wrote: >> You've seen scripts/mkroot.sh? >> > > I thought this was still in alpha, The script isn't, but bits of toybox it leans on are. The PENDING list in scripts/install.sh (part of make install_airlock) is the list of stuff it still needs in order to build itself

Re: [Toybox] Subject: [PATCH] Add getopt(1).

2019-11-24 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/23/19 10:18 AM, enh wrote: > The only real point of getopt(1) over the getopts built-in is long options. > That's all I've seen it used for in practice. It does seem like folks know > about > getopts, and they do use it when short options are all they want. The reason it was still on my tod

Re: [Toybox] [PATCH] du.test: skip on Mac.

2019-11-24 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/23/19 10:05 AM, enh wrote: > So the right thing to do (in the absence of a generic way to test > filesystem > capabilities) is to test for a recognized filesystem type that supports > them, I > guess? > > It's worse than that, though, because SELinux is an option orthogonal to