[Toybox] Screen vs. tmux (was: optional fatter cat(1))

2014-12-28 Thread Jason Spiro
Rob Landley rob@... wrote: I plan to implement vi over the next year, but it's one of the four realy big commands required by posix (sed, awk, sh, vi) and I've been debugging sed against real-world data for _weeks_ now. [...] There are some others (the kernel build requires bc now, if I'm

Re: [Toybox] Screen vs. tmux (was: optional fatter cat(1))

2014-12-28 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 03:12:03 + (UTC) Jason Spiro jasonspi...@gmail.com wrote: Rob Landley rob@... wrote: I plan to implement vi over the next year, but it's one of the four realy big commands required by posix (sed, awk, sh, vi) and I've been debugging sed against real-world data

Re: [Toybox] Screen vs. tmux (was: optional fatter cat(1))

2014-12-28 Thread Robert Thompson
Once upon a time, the serial issue would have kept me using screen. But, these days I use picoterm as the minimal pty--serial connector, and that works as well with tmux as screen's own serial handling worked with screen. It also works well without any multiplexer, just letting your (virtual)