On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>
>
> On 05/04/2016 03:55 PM, enh wrote:
>> seems like a bug that if you use -o but don't include 'tid', -T becomes a
>> no-op?
>>
>> ps -A -T | wc -l
>> ps -A -T -o name | wc -l
>
> The way I implemented it,
>
> 1) If you
On 05/04/2016 03:55 PM, enh wrote:
> seems like a bug that if you use -o but don't include 'tid', -T becomes a
> no-op?
>
> ps -A -T | wc -l
> ps -A -T -o name | wc -l
The way I implemented it,
1) If you display tid, it fetches tid.
2) -T changes the default fields displayed.
I'm happy to