Re: [Toybox] tests

2020-06-17 Thread Rob Landley
> i'm not sure i understand the intent behind this change: > > commit 7f062f2dcfa5511139476e1aef8db74f49566432 > Author: Rob Landley > Date: Tue Nov 20 17:50:05 2018 -0600 > > Skip tests that don't have the executable bit set unless $TEST_ALL set. I blogged about it when it went in:

[Toybox] tests

2020-06-16 Thread enh via Toybox
i'm not sure i understand the intent behind this change: commit 7f062f2dcfa5511139476e1aef8db74f49566432 Author: Rob Landley Date: Tue Nov 20 17:50:05 2018 -0600 Skip tests that don't have the executable bit set unless $TEST_ALL set. i assumed this was to avoid running tests for stuff

Re: [Toybox] tests/losetup.test

2017-12-04 Thread Rob Landley
On 12/04/2017 05:18 PM, enh wrote: > not sure what's meant to be going on in this file, but it looks wrong > in several ways. Sigh, that shouldn't have been checked in. (I need tests/pending.) The theory here is that I use a known qemu testing environment (ala mkroot) to run tests in an

[Toybox] tests/losetup.test

2017-12-04 Thread enh
not sure what's meant to be going on in this file, but it looks wrong in several ways. diff --git a/tests/losetup.test b/tests/losetup.test index 651c693..3e6aa18 100755 --- a/tests/losetup.test +++ b/tests/losetup.test @@ -9,16 +9,19 @@ then exit fi +# This file contains no tests, even if

[Toybox] Tests for find

2013-04-14 Thread Felix Janda
Hello, attached is a patch with a test script for find. It tests only the expression handling and uses only primaries which are currently implemented in the find toy. Felix # HG changeset patch # User Felix Janda felix.ja...@posteo.de # Date 1365936336 -7200 # Node ID

[Toybox] Tests for mkfifo

2012-12-27 Thread Felix Janda
Similar patches for mkfifo. mkfifo -m was actually already implemented although the comments in mkfifo.c said it still had to be done. The tests are very similar to the mkdir ones. Felix # HG changeset patch # User Felix Janda felix.ja...@posteo.de # Date 1356627134 -3600 # Node ID