So many open old email windows...
On 6/19/20 7:23 PM, enh wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:46 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>> On 6/16/20 3:27 PM, enh wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:05 PM Rob Landley wrote:
On 6/15/20 1:42 PM, enh wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:05 AM Rob
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 6:31 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 6/19/20 7:36 PM, enh wrote:
> > as well as available via the web ui which is something that I don't
> > think you are seeing when you look the builds in my repository.
> >
> > do you know whether a random like me can sign up to get the
On 6/20/20 9:56 AM, Eric Molitor wrote:
> I disabled builds on pull requests in the example which should discourage use.
> By default only project members are notified but you can add non-project
> members
> to the notifications. Currently the MacOS and GCC Ubuntu builds and tests are
>
On 6/19/20 7:36 PM, enh wrote:
> as well as available via the web ui which is something that I don't
> think you are seeing when you look the builds in my repository.
>
> do you know whether a random like me can sign up to get the mails, or
> does that only work for project members?
I'm happy to
I disabled builds on pull requests in the example which should discourage
use. By default only project members are notified but you can add
non-project members to the notifications. Currently the MacOS and GCC
Ubuntu builds and tests are completing fine but there are issues with the
ASAN Clang
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 5:27 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 6/16/20 3:27 PM, enh wrote:
> >> Did you know that "lunch" without options does _not_ list sdk-eng? (Which
> >> sounds
> >> like it's building the sdk and not an aosp image to run under the
> >> emulator, but
> >> let's at least try what
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 3:36 PM Eric Molitor wrote:
>
> We are extremely busy at work so coming back to this thread later than I
> intended. I also have mixed feelings about MSFT and GithHub but in some ways
> why not take advantage of them and exploit what they are offering.
(sorry, couldn't
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:46 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 6/16/20 3:27 PM, enh wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:05 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/15/20 1:42 PM, enh wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:05 AM Rob Landley wrote:
> > i don't actually remember us ever having an
On 6/16/20 3:27 PM, enh wrote:
>> Did you know that "lunch" without options does _not_ list sdk-eng? (Which
>> sounds
>> like it's building the sdk and not an aosp image to run under the emulator,
>> but
>> let's at least try what it says first...)
>
> there are lots of options not listed in
We are extremely busy at work so coming back to this thread later than I
intended. I also have mixed feelings about MSFT and GithHub but in some
ways why not take advantage of them and exploit what they are offering. I
don't believe there is any significant coupling to MSFT and it's a
relatively
On 6/16/20 3:27 PM, enh wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:05 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>> On 6/15/20 1:42 PM, enh wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:05 AM Rob Landley wrote:
> i don't actually remember us ever having an aarch64-specific issue.
> (funnily enough, a 32-bit x86 build
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:26 AM dmccunney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:27 PM enh via Toybox
> wrote:
> > (i'm personally looking forward to the web editor they've talked about,
> > if it's anything close to Visual Studio Code --- which it ought to be, given
> > that that's just
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:27 PM enh via Toybox wrote:
> (i'm personally looking forward to the web editor they've talked about,
> if it's anything close to Visual Studio Code --- which it ought to be, given
> that that's just Javascript.)
You mean this? https://www.gitpod.io/
Looks like it
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:05 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 6/15/20 1:42 PM, enh wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:05 AM Rob Landley wrote:
> >>> i don't actually remember us ever having an aarch64-specific issue.
> >>> (funnily enough, a 32-bit x86 build would probably find more bugs,
> >>>
On 6/15/20 1:42 PM, enh wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:05 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>>> i don't actually remember us ever having an aarch64-specific issue.
>>> (funnily enough, a 32-bit x86 build would probably find more bugs,
>>> since i don't think anyone regularly tests any 32-bit arch
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:05 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 6/15/20 11:07 AM, enh via Toybox wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 12:30 AM Eric Molitor wrote:
> >>
> >> Would aarch64 builds on Ubuntu and Alpine be useful? That will be slightly
> >> more complex to setup but is possible.
> >
> > i
On 6/15/20 11:07 AM, enh via Toybox wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 12:30 AM Eric Molitor wrote:
>>
>> Would aarch64 builds on Ubuntu and Alpine be useful? That will be slightly
>> more complex to setup but is possible.
>
> i don't actually remember us ever having an aarch64-specific issue.
>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 12:30 AM Eric Molitor wrote:
>
> Would aarch64 builds on Ubuntu and Alpine be useful? That will be slightly
> more complex to setup but is possible.
i don't actually remember us ever having an aarch64-specific issue.
(funnily enough, a 32-bit x86 build would probably
Would aarch64 builds on Ubuntu and Alpine be useful? That will be slightly
more complex to setup but is possible.
> it seems like your setup is running on a cron-like timer? is there a way
> to say "on every push" instead?
>
> There are three build triggers in the configuration, cron, push on
that's pretty awesome!
it seems like your setup is running on a cron-like timer? is there a way to
say "on every push" instead?
i'm assuming a clang-based build with `export ASAN=1` would be doable too?
that would give us coverage of the other common compiler _and_ catch some
memory issues
20 matches
Mail list logo
