On 2/1/23 11:02, enh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:29 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>> On 1/31/23 22:57, enh wrote:
>> > aye, but only if you're stuck with a compiler from the 1990s... even gcc
>> > has
>> > warned about that for years :-P
>> ...
>> > and the warning unless it has
Ah, missed that when I updated the FAQ.
On 2/1/23 14:25, Moritz C. Weber wrote:
> ---
> README | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index f39c9216..ba3041d2 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ toybox to run on the
On 2/1/23 11:13, enh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:11 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>> Replying to
>> https://github.com/landley/toybox/issues/408#issuecomment-1410711619
>> here instead of the list because design discussions in github issues comments
>> tend to get lost (or at least I can't
On 2/1/23 16:26, enh via Toybox wrote:
> i think there's a catch-22 there though --- the trouble is that until
> an editor meets the "good enough that i'm using it to develop itself"
> bar, it really struggles to make much forward progress.
In 1991, Linus Torvalds accidentally fried his minix
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:16 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/1/23 11:02, enh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:29 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/31/23 22:57, enh wrote:
> >> > aye, but only if you're stuck with a compiler from the 1990s... even gcc
> >> > has
> >> > warned about that
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:34 AM Rob Landley wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/1/23 11:13, enh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:11 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> >>
> >> Replying to
> >> https://github.com/landley/toybox/issues/408#issuecomment-1410711619
> >> here instead of the list because design discussions
