Rob, this may also have an effect in toybox, ?maybe?
Forwarded Message
Subject: [t2] GCC 9 breaks compilation of glibc
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 10:37:59 +0200
From: Frits Letteboer
To: T2 developers mailing list
Source: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/merge_requests/626
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 10:57:23PM -0700, enh wrote:
> > I know not everything is a macro that can be tested; both myself and
> > folks from other implementations are interested in developing an
> > agreed-upon way to report availability of other extensions via macros,
> > so that configure-style
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 05:27:24PM +0300, makep...@firemail.cc wrote:
>
> > wouldn't it be better to have more stuff along the lines of clang's
> > __has_builtin/__has_feature/__has_include? they're already very useful
> > for getting rid of this kind of stuff, and a __has_function would
> >
> wouldn't it be better to have more stuff along the lines of clang's
> __has_builtin/__has_feature/__has_include? they're already very useful
> for getting rid of this kind of stuff, and a __has_function would
> cover most of what's missing.
Feature claims of clang and musl are giving us a
On 5/1/19 1:12 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 4/30/19 10:59 AM, enh via Toybox wrote:
>> there's a tar file checked in to AOSP that causes trouble for toybox
>> tar. you can find it (and the script that generates it) here:
>>
>>
