On 07/30/2013 07:08:11 PM, Strake wrote:
On 30/07/2013, Felix Janda felix.ja...@posteo.de wrote:
You don't really need the index. Just loop over toys.optargs,
which are
conveniently null terminated.
To me, at least, it is clearer with the index, as it's a commoner
idiom.
I can't
Strake wrote:
On 28/07/2013, Felix Janda felix.ja...@posteo.de wrote:
Some comments below.
Thanks.
Thanks for your new patch.
[...]
+ for (ii = 0; ii toys.optc; ii++) {
You don't really need the index. Just loop over toys.optargs, which are
conveniently null terminated.
To me,
On 30/07/2013, Felix Janda felix.ja...@posteo.de wrote:
You don't really need the index. Just loop over toys.optargs, which are
conveniently null terminated.
To me, at least, it is clearer with the index, as it's a commoner idiom.
I can't really argue with that.
I'm not against your
From feeb53bf11e949e48f80752a642fe551c284d7a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Strake strake...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:30:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] add renice
---
toys/pending/renice.c | 48
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode
