Re: [Toybox] Regarding toybox 'top' command options support

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > I've cc'd my reply to the toybox mailing list, but removed the > identifying info from the submitter rather than do the "can I post this" > round trip. (They can reply publicly if they like.) > > On 09/22/2017 07:26 AM, XXX

Re: [Toybox] Release prep and testcmd in tests/*.test

say what you like about all the perl (https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/mksh/+/master/src/check.pl), there's a lot to be said for the style it lets mksh tests be written in (https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/mksh/+/master/src/check.t). it's inherently

[Toybox] [PATCH] Basic Mach-O support in file(1).

The Nexus Player build was subtly broken in that it assumed that the host was using ELF. No-one noticed until a Mac user tried to flash their build, which contained a Mach-O x86 binary instead of an ELF x86 binary. Hilarity ensued. (On the same day, file(1) was able to explain a mixup with an ELF

Re: [Toybox] [landley/toybox] xargs: exec ... Argument list too long (#40)

i did find some time (no pun intended) to look at the equivalent bug in find on friday, but spent it all on a couple of ratholes i discovered trying to set up a test :-( On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > On 09/21/2017 10:40 AM, enh wrote: >> i should

Re: [Toybox] Regarding toybox 'top' command options support

I've cc'd my reply to the toybox mailing list, but removed the identifying info from the submitter rather than do the "can I post this" round trip. (They can reply publicly if they like.) On 09/22/2017 07:26 AM, XXX wrote: > Dear Rob Landley > > I have gone through toybox code developed by you.