Re: [Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-15 Thread Denys Nykula
> >> You may want to publish a DNS record > > It's dreamhost handling all that automatically. Most warnings are about your domain settings, manual configuration: https://help.dreamhost.com/hc/en-us/articles/215414867-How-do-I-add-custom-DNS-records- > If I had any control over it I'd > have

Re: [Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-14 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/14/19 6:58 PM, Denys Nykula wrote: >> The strange thing is that the binutils, gcc & musl lists don't seem to >> cause gmail to barf nearly as much as the toybox list does. Dreamhost _also_ sucks. It's the interaction of gmail and dreamhost that becomes truly pathological. > Mail-tester

Re: [Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-14 Thread Denys Nykula
> The strange thing is that the binutils, gcc & musl lists don't seem to > cause gmail to barf nearly as much as the toybox list does. Mail-tester complains this way about this list server, rating its likeliness of reaching destination as 32%: > Listed in SORBS (last 28 days)

Re: [Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-14 Thread Patrick Oppenlander
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:17 AM Rob Landley wrote: > > On 11/13/19 9:25 AM, Jarno Mäkipää wrote: > > It seems that gmail stopped receiving emails from list again. I got > > kicked out of list for excessive bounces yesterday... Somehow gmail > > worked for month or two after I complained about it

Re: [Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-13 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/13/19 9:25 AM, Jarno Mäkipää wrote: > It seems that gmail stopped receiving emails from list again. I got > kicked out of list for excessive bounces yesterday... Somehow gmail > worked for month or two after I complained about it last time. > > -Jarno Oh I still get unsubscribed by gmail

Re: [Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-13 Thread Rob Landley
On 11/13/19 9:00 AM, Andrew Ilijic wrote: > Hi Rob, > > I saw this email and thought this patch might help make > `relative_path()` better. Ok, let's see... > https://www.mail-archive.com/toybox@lists.landley.net/msg06136.html > On 08 Nov 2019 18:27:44 -0800, Rob via Toybox wrote: >> In theory

[Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-13 Thread Jarno Mäkipää
It seems that gmail stopped receiving emails from list again. I got kicked out of list for excessive bounces yesterday... Somehow gmail worked for month or two after I complained about it last time. -Jarno > Hi Rob, > I saw this email and thought this patch might help make > `relative_path()`

Re: [Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-13 Thread Andrew Ilijic
Hi Rob, I saw this email and thought this patch might help make `relative_path()` better. Commit Message: While trying to add features to `readlink` and `realpath` I saw that adding a "/" to the end of the `from` variable, made it possible for me to get `realpath --relative-to=DIR` to work. The

[Toybox] Did I mention why I didn't implement out of tree build?

2019-11-08 Thread Rob Landley
Because cp -s exists and works. git clone https://github.com/landley/toybox cp -sr $PWD/toybox walrus cd walrus make distclean defconfig toybox In theory if you're using toybox cp you can use a relative path, which was part of why I did relative_path but darn it it's STILL broken: cd