On 5/26/19 11:12 AM, enh wrote:
>>> Anyway, this is enough for me get started building AOSP with toybox find.
>>
>> Let's see, does it...
>>
>> find . -type f -printf '%.3s\n'
>>
>> Of course it does. And this is why I created next_printf().
>
> huh. i did think about that, and though i didn't
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 7:53 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 5/24/19 6:06 PM, enh via Toybox wrote:
> > This only implements the format specifiers that I've seen used in the
> > wild (which is actually a significant fraction of the total supported by
> > findutils' find). The most obvious gap is in
On 5/24/19 6:06 PM, enh via Toybox wrote:
> This only implements the format specifiers that I've seen used in the
> wild (which is actually a significant fraction of the total supported by
> findutils' find). The most obvious gap is in the time support. I'm happy
> to add more, but didn't want to
On 5/24/19 6:06 PM, enh via Toybox wrote:
> This only implements the format specifiers that I've seen used in the
> wild (which is actually a significant fraction of the total supported by
> findutils' find). The most obvious gap is in the time support. I'm happy
> to add more, but didn't want to
